Selectivity tuning in an HPLC multicomponent separation

Journal of Liquid Chromatography and Related Technologies

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1453-1471

  Benická, Eva ^a   Krupcík, Jan ^a,d   Lehotay, Jozef ^a   Sandra, Pat ^b   Armstrong, Daniel W ^c  

^a SLOVAK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Slovakia)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d FCHFT   (Slovakia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CATALYST SELECTIVITY; DISTILLATION COLUMNS; FLOW CONTROL; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; OPTIMIZATION;

ANALYTES; COLUMN SYSTEM; MULTICOMPONENT SEPARATION; POLARITIES;

PHASE SEPARATION;

ARTICLE; COLUMN CHROMATOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FLOW RATE; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 20844462243     PISSN: 10826076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/JLC-200058326     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Schoenmakers, P.J. Optimization of Chromatographic Selectivity - A Guide to Method Development; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986.
2. Welsch, T.; Dornberger, U.; Lerche, D. Selectivity Tuning of Serially Coupled Columns in High Performance Liquid Chromatography. JHRC 1993, 16, 18-26.
3. Snyder, L.R.; Glajch, J.L.; Kirkland, J.J. Practical HPLC Method Development for High-Performance Liquid Chromatography, 2nd Ed.; Wiley/Interscience: New York, 1997.
4. Dolan, J.W.; Snyder, L.R.; Djordjevic, N.M.; Hill, D.W.; Saunders, D.L.; Van Heukelem, L.; Waeghe, T.J. Simultaneous variation of temperature and gradient steepness for reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography method development. I. Application to 14 different samples using computer simulation. J. Chromatogr. A 1998, 803, 1-31.
5. Jupille, T.H.; Dolan, J.W.; Snyder, L.R.; Molnar, I. Two-dimensional optimization using different pairs of variables for the reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separation of a mixture of acidic compounds. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 948, 35-41.
6. Dolan, J.W.; Snyder, L.R. Using computer-simulation to develop a gradient elution method for reversed phase HPLC. LC-GC-Mag. Sep. Sci. 1987, 5, 970-973.
7. Galushko, S.V.; Kamenchuk, A.A.; Pit, G.L. Software for method development in reversed-phase liquid-chromatography. Am. Lab. 1995, 27, G33-J33.
8. Snyder, L.R.; Dolan, J.W. HPLC computer-simulation-optimizing column conditions. Am. Lab. 1986, 18, 37-40.
9. Fekete, J.; Morovjan, G.; Csizmadia, F.; Darvas, F. Method development by an expert-system - advantages and limitations. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 660, 33-46.
10. Fekete, J.; Morovjan, G.; Csizmadia, F.; Darvas, F. Method development by an expert system advantages and limitations. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 660, 33-46.
11. Csokan, P.P.; Darvas, F.; Csizmadia, F.; Valko, K. HPLC method development through retention prediction using structural data. LC GC-Mag. Sep. Sci. 1994, 40-44.
12. Smith, T.P.I.R.; Guhan, S.; Taksen, K.; Vavra, M.; Myers, D.; Hearn, M.T.W. Demonstration of inferior phrenic arteries on spiral CT - case report. J. Chromatogr. A 2002, 972, 27-43.
13. Li, W.; Rasmussen, H.T. Strategy for developing and optimizing liquid chromatography methods in pharmaceutical development using computer-assisted screening and Plackett-Burman experimental design. J. Chromatogr. A 2003 16, 165-180.
14. Chester, T.L. Business-objective-directed, constraint-based multivariate optimization of high-performance liquid chromatography operational parameters. J. Chromatogr. A 2003, 1016, 181-193.
15. Dungelová, J.; Lehotay, J.; Krupcik, J.; Cizmárik, J.; Welsch, T.; Armstrong, D.W. Selectivity tuning of serially coupled (S,S) WHELK-O 1 and (R,R) WHELK-O 1 columns in HPLC. J. Chrom. Sci. 2004, 42, 135-139.
16. Massart, D.L.; Dijkstra, A.; Kaufman, L. Evaluation and Optimization of Laboratory Methods and Analytical Procedures; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978.
17. Altech, 35 Royal Road, Flemington, NJ 08822, USA.
18. Krupcík, J.; Grena, M.; Spánik, I.; Benická, E.; Hrouzek, J.; Skacáni, I.; Sandra, P. Computerized Optimization of Selectivity for Direct Capillary Gas Chromatographic Multicomponent Separations of Enantiomers. J. Chromatogr. A 1997, 779, 253-262.
19. Microcal™ Origin™ Version 4.10, Microcal Software, One Roundhouse Plaza, Northampton, MA, 01060 USA.
20. Dear, G.J.; Mallett, D.N.; Higton, D.M.; Roberts, A.D.; Bird, S.A.; Young, H.; Plumb, R.S.; Ismail, I.M. The potential of serially coupled alkyl-bonded silica monolithic columns for high resolution separations of pharmaceutical compounds in biological fluids. Chromatographia 2002, 55, 177-184.
21. Benicka, E. (under preparation).