Three key questions on fractal conductance fluctuations: Dynamics, quantization, and coherence

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 70, Issue 8, 2004, Pages

  Micolich, A P ^a,b   Taylor, R P ^b   Martin, T P ^b   Newbury, R ^a   Fromhold, T M ^c   Davies, A G ^d   Linke, H ^b   Tribe, W R ^d   Macks, L D ^a   Smith, C G ^d   Linfield, E H ^d   Ritchie, D A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; DEVICE; DYNAMICS; ELECTRON; MEASUREMENT; QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 20844459810     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.70.085302     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. R. A. Jalabert, H. U. Baranger, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2442 (1990); C. M. Marcus, A. J. Rimberg, R. M. Westervelt, P. F. Hopkins, and A. C. Gossard, ibid. 69, 506 (1992).
2. R. A. Jalabert, H. U. Baranger, and A. D. Stone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 2442 (1990); C. M. Marcus, A. J. Rimberg, R. M. Westervelt, P. F. Hopkins, and A. C. Gossard, ibid. 69, 506 (1992).
3. J. P. Bird, R. Akis, D. K. Ferry, A. P.S. de Moura, Y.-C. Lai, and K. M. Indlekofer, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 583 (2003).
4. R. P. Taylor, Nanotechnology 5, 183 (1994).
5. T. M. Fromhold, C. R. Tench, R. P. Taylor, A. P. Micolich, and R. Newbury, Physica B 249-251, 334 (1998).
6. R. Ketzmerick, Phys. Rev. B 54, 10841 (1996).
7. J.-F. Gouyet, Physics and Fractal Structures (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1996).
8. A. P. Micolich, R. P. Taylor, R. Newbury, J. P. Bird, R. Wirtz, C. P. Dettmann, Y. Aoyagi, and T. Sugano, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 10, 1339 (1998).
9. A. S. Sachrajda, R. Ketzmerick, C. Gould, Y. Feng, P. J. Kelly, A. Delage, and Z. Wasilewski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1948 (1998).
10. A. Budiyono and K. Nakamura, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 17, 89 (2003).
11. G. Benenti, G. Casati, I. Guarneri, and M. Terraneo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 014101 (2001).
12. I. Guarneri and M. Terraneo, Phys. Rev. E 65, 015203 (2001).
13. E. Louis and J. A. Vergés, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13014 (2000).
14. R. Crook, C. G. Smith, A. C. Graham, I. Farrer, H. E. Beere, and D. A. Ritchie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 246803 (2003).
15. A. P. Micolich, R. P. Taylor, A. G. Davies, J. P. Bird, R. Newbury, T. M. Fromtiold, A. Ehlert, H. Linke, L. D. Macks, W. R. Tribe, E. H. Linfield, D. A. Ritchie, J. Cooper, Y. Aoyagi, and P. B. Wilkinson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 036802 (2001).
16. Gate design includes a small gap (top center), which is pinched off for the range of applied gate biases discussed here.
17. A. P. Micolich, Ph.D. thesis, UNSW (2000), cond-mat/0209509.
18. B. Dubuc, J. F. Quiniou, C. Roques-Carmes, C. Tricot, and S. W. Zucker, Phys. Rev. A 39, 1500 (1989).
19. FFTs for the two sets of FCF data show significant differences particularly for high ΔB, demonstrating the finger gate is active.
20. A. P. Micolich, R. P. Taylor, A. G. Davies, T. M. Fromhold, H. Linke, L. D. Macks, R. Newbury, A. Ehlert, W. R. Tribe, E. H. Linfield, and D. A. Ritchie, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4381 (2002).