|
|
Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 155-205
|
|
The bane of surrogate decision-making: Defining the best interests of never-competent persons
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
CAREGIVER;
CUSTODY;
DISABLED PERSON;
FAMILY;
HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL;
HUMAN;
JURISPRUDENCE;
JUSTICE;
LAW;
LIVING WILL;
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING;
MENTAL CAPACITY;
ORGAN DONOR;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PATIENT CARE;
POLICY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
REVIEW;
TERMINAL CARE;
TERMINALLY ILL PATIENT;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNCONSCIOUSNESS;
WELLBEING;
ANALYTICAL APPROACH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
DECISION MAKING;
HUMANS;
LEGAL GUARDIANS;
MENTAL COMPETENCY;
MENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS;
PARENT-CHILD RELATIONS;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
TERMINAL CARE;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
|
|
EID: 20844457479
PISSN: 01947648
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/01947640590949922 Document Type: Review |
|
Times cited : (21)
|
|
References (0)
|
