Survival after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis: Does left ventricular mass regression have a clinical correlate?

European Heart Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 51-57

  Gaudino, Mario ^a   Alessandrini, Francesco ^a   Glieca, Franco ^a   Luciani, Nicola ^a   Cellini, Carlo ^a   Pragliola, Claudio ^a   Morelli, Mauro ^a   Canosa, Carlo ^a   Nasso, Giuseppe ^a   Possati, Gianfederico ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

Aorta; Hypertrophy; Surgery; Survival

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FATALITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEART FUNCTION; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE ENDDIASTOLIC VOLUME; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; LUNG ARTERY PRESSURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; HYPERTROPHY, LEFT VENTRICULAR; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 20844451883     PISSN: 0195668X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi012     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Lund O, Chandrasekaran V, Grocott-Mason R et al. Primary aortic valve replacement with allografts over twenty-five years: valve-related and procedure-related determinants of outcome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:77-91.
2. Sahn DJ, Demaria A, Kisslo J et al. Recommendation regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1978;58:1072-1081.
3. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1986;57:450-458.
4. Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Taylor PC et al. Primary isolated aortic valve replacement. Early and late results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1989;97:675-694.
5. Lund O. Preoperative risk evaluation and stratification of long-term survival after valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Reasons for earlier operative intervention. Circulation 1990;82:124-139.
6. Lund O, Pilegaard H, Nielsen TT et al. Thirty-day mortality after valve replacement for aortic stenosis over the last 22 years. A multivariate risk stratification. Eur Heart J 1991;12:322-331.
7. Mehta RH, Bruckman D, Das S et al. Implication of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:919-928.
8. Garcia Fuster R, Montera Arguto JA, Gil Albarova O et al. Left ventricular mass index in aortic valve surgery: a new index for early valve replacement? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:696-702.
9. Panidis IP, Kotler MN, Ren JF et al. Development and regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1984;3:1309-1320.
10. Jin XY, Zhang ZM, Gibson DG et al. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:683-690.
11. De Paulis R, Sommariva L, Colagrande L et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis with different valve substitutes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998; 116:590-598.
12. Bech-Hanssen O, Caidahl K, Wall B et al. Influence of aortic valve replacement, prosthesis type, and size on functional outcome and ventricular mass in patients with aortic stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:57-65.
13. Walther T, Falk V, Langebartels G et al. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves. Impact on early regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1999;100(Suppl. II):6-10.
14. Levy D, Garrison RJ, Savage DD et al. Prognostic implication of echocardiographically determined left entricular mass in the Framingham heart study. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1561-1566.
15. Koren MJ, Devereux RB, Casale PN et al. Relation of left ventricular mass and geometry to morbidity and mortality in uncompleted essential hypertension. Ann Intern Med 1991;114:345-352.
16. Krayenbuehl HP, Hess OM, Monrad ES et al. Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease early, intermediate, and late after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 1989;79:744-755.
17. Villari B, Chiriello M. Interstitial changes and ventricular hypertrophy in man. Cardiologia 1994;39(Suppl. 1):375-379.
18. Messerli FH, Soria F. Ventricular dysrhythmias, left ventricular hypertrophy, and sudden death. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther 1994;8:557-563.
19. Hamasaki S, Al Suwaidi J, Higano ST et al. Attenuated coronary flow reserve and vascular remodeling in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35: 1654-1660.
20. Lessick J, Mutlak D, Markiewicz W et al. Failure of left ventricular hypertrophy to regress after surgery for aortic valve stenosis. Echocardiography 2002;19:359-366.
21. Eichinger WB, Botzenhardt F, Gunzinger R et al. Left ventricluar mass regression after aortic valve replacement with the mosaic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:529-536.
22. Gonzales-Juanatey JR, Vega FM, Gude F et al. Influence of prosthesis size and left ventricular mass on left ventricular diastolic reserve in patients with aortic valve prostheses. J Heart Valve Dis 2001; 10:611-618.
23. Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Camici PG et al. Functional changes in coronary microcirculation after valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 2003;107:3170-3175.
24. Lund O, Emmertsen K, Dorup I et al. Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile. Eur Heart J 2003;24:1437-1446.
25. Blackstone EH, Cosgrove DM, Jamieson WRE et al. Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:783-796.
26. De Carlo M, Milano AD, Mardi C et al. Serial doppler echocardiographic evaluation of small-sized Sorin Bicarbon prostheses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:337-343.