Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on porous TiO 2/glass composites - Part 2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine;Anwendung eines bandscheibenersatzimplantats aus einer neuartigen porösen TiO2/glas-keramik - Teil 2: Biomechanische untersuchungen nach implantation in die schafs-halswirbelsäule

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 50, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 111-118

  Korinth, Marcus C ^a,b   Hero, T ^a   Pandorf, T ^a   Zell, D ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Animal model; Biomechanical evaluation; Bone cement; Cervical spine; Sheep

Indexed keywords

BONE CEMENT; GLASS; HISTOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATES; RADIOLOGY; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL MODEL; BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION; CERVICAL SPINE; SHEEP;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

BIOMATERIAL; GLASS; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TITANIUM;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL SPINE; IMPLANT; IMPLANTATION; KYPHOSIS; NONHUMAN; POROSITY; SHEEP; SPINE FUSION; SPINE MOBILITY; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; STIMULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; GLASS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; POROSITY; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SHEEP; SPINAL FUSION; TITANIUM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 20844442112     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/bmt.2005.016     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cahill, D. W.; Martin, G. J.; Hajjar, M.V.; Sonstein, W.; Gaham, L.B.; Engelman, R.W.: Suitability of bioresorbable cages for anterior cervical fusion. J. Neurosurg. (Spine) 98 (2003), 195-201.
2. Cunningham, B.W.; Kanayama, M.; Parker, L.M.: Osteogenic protein versus autologous interbody arthrodesis in the sheep thoracic spine. A endoscopic study using the Bagby and Kuslich interbody fusion device. Spine 24 (1999), 509-518.
3. Gleizes, V.; Viguier, E.; Feron, J.M.; Canivet, S.; Lavaste, F.: Effects of freezing on the biomechanics of the intervertebral disc. Surg. Radiol. Anat. 20 (1998), 403-407.
4. Kanayama, M.; Cunningham, B.W.; Haggerty, C.J.; Abumi, K.; Kaneda, K.; McAfee, P.C.: In vitro biomechanical investigation of the stability and stress-shielding effect of lumbar interbody fusion devices. J. Neurosurg. (Spine) 93 (2000), 259-265.
5. Kandziora, F.; Pflugmacher, R.; Schäfer, J.; Born, C.; Duda, G.; Haas, N.P.; Mittlmeier, T.: Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages. Spine 26 (2001), 1850-1857.
6. Kandziora, F.; Pflugmacher, R.; Scholz, M.; Schnake, K.; Lücke, M.; Schröder, R.;. Mittlmeier, T: Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study. Spine 26 (2001), 1028-1037.
7. Kandziora, F.; Pflugmacher, R.; Scholz, M.; Schäfer, J.; Schollmeier, G.; Schnake, K.J.; Bail, H.; Duda, G.; Haas, N.P.: Experimentelle Spondylodese der Schafshalswirbelsäule. Teil 1: Der Effekt des cage-Designs auf die intervertebrale Fusion. Chirurg 73 (2002), 909-917.
8. Kettler, A.; Wilke, H.J.; Claes, L.: Effects of neck movements on stability and subsidence in cervical interbody fusion: an in vitro study. J. Neurosurg. 94 (2001), 97-107.
9. Korinth, M.C.; Moersch, S.; Ragoß, C.; Schopphoff, E.: Biomechanische Untersuchungen eines Bandscheibenersatzimplantats aus einer neuartigen porösen TiO2/Glas-Keramik an der humanen Halswirbelsäule. Biomedizinische Technik 48 (2003), 349-355.
10. Lee, E.J.; Hung, Y.C.; Lee, M.Y.; Yan, J. J.; Lee, Y. T.; Chang, J. H.; Chang, G. L.; Chung, K. C.: Kinematics of cervical spine discectomy with and without bone grafting: quantitative evaluation of late fusion in a sheep model. Neurosurgery 44 (1999), 139-146.
11. Panjabi, M. M.; Krag, M.; Summers, D.; Videman, T.: Biomechanical time-tolerance of fresh cadaveric human spine specimens. J. Orthop. Res. 3 (1985), 292-300.
12. Sandhu, H.S.; Turner, S.; Kabo, J.M.; Kanim, L.E.; D. Liu; Nourpavar, A.; Delamarter, R.B.; Dawson, E.G.: Distractive properties of a threaded interbody fusion device. Spine 21 (1996), 1201-1210.
13. Schopphoff, E.; Phoa, T.; Birnbaum, K.: Versuchsaufbau zur Belastungssimulation von multisegmentalen Wirbelsäulenabschnitten. Biomedizinische Technik 48 (2003), 213-216.
14. Steffen, T.; Tsantrizos, A.; Fruth, I.; Aebi, M.: Cages: designs and concepts. Eur. Spine J. 9 Suppl 1 (2000), S89-S94.
15. Toth J. M.; An, H.S.; Lim, T.H.; Ran, Y.; Weiss, N.G.; Lundberg, W. R.; Xu, R.M.; Lynch, K.L.: Evaluation of porous biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics for anterior cervical interbody fusion in a caprine model. Spine 20 (1995), 2203-2210.
16. van Limbeck, J.; Jacobs, W.C.; Anderson, P.G.; Pavlov, P.W.: A systematic literature review to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervical interbody fusion. Eur. Spine J. 9 (2000), 129-136.
17. Weiner, B.K.; Fraser, R.D.: Spine update lumbar interbody fusion cages. Spine 23 (1998), 634-640.
18. Wilke, H.J.; Kettler, A.; Claes, L.E.: Are sheep a valid biomechanical model for human spines? Spine 22 (1997), 2365-2374.
19. Wilke, H. J.; Wenger, K.; Claes, L.: Testing criteria for spinal implants: recommendations for the standardization of in vitro stability testing of spinal implants. Eur. Spine J. 7 (1998), 148-154.
20. Zdeblick, T. A.; Ghanayem, A. J.; Rapoff, A.J.: Cervical interbody fusion cages. An animal model with and without bone morphogenetic protein. Spine 23 (1998), 758-765.