Recognizing faces defined by texture gradients

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 158-167

  Liu, Chang Hong ^a   Collin, Charles A ^b   Farivar, Reza ^c   Chaudhuri, Avi ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744459266     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03195019     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. BASSILI, J. N. (1978). Facial motion in the perception of faces and of emotional expression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 4, 373-379.
2. BASSILI, J. N. (1979). Emotion recognition: The role of facial movement and the relative importance of upper and lower areas of the face. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 37, 2049-2058.
3. BRAUNSTEIN, M. L., & PAYNE, J. W. (1969). Perspective and form ratio as determinants of relative slant judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 584-590.
4. BRUCE, V., BURTON, M., & DOYLE, T. (1992). Faces as surfaces. In V. Bruce & M. Burton (Eds.), Processing images of faces (pp. 232-252). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
5. BRUCE, V., HANNA, E., DENCH, N., HEALEY, P., & BURTON, M. (1992). The importance of "mass" in line drawings of faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 619-628.
6. BRUCE, V., HEALEY, P., BURTON, M., DOYLE, T., COOMBES, A., & LINNEY, A. (1991). Recognizing facial surfaces. Perception, 20, 755-769.
7. BRUCE, V., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1994). Recognizing objects and faces. In V. Bruce & G. W. Humphreys (Eds.), Object and face recognition (pp. 141-180). Hove, U.K.: Erlbaum.
8. BRUCE, V., & LANGTON, S. (1994). The use of pigmentation and shading information in recognising the sex and identities of faces. Perception, 23, 803-822.
9. BRUCE, V., & VALENTINE, T. (1988). When a nod's as good as a wink: The role of dynamic information in facial recognition. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 169-174). London: Wiley.
10. BRUCE, V., VALENTINE, T., & BADDELEY, A. D. (1987). The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 109-120.
11. CAVANAGH, P. (1987). Reconstructing the third dimension: Interactions between color, texture, motion, binocular disparity, and shape. Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, 37, 171-195.
12. CHRISTOU, C., KOENDERINK, J. J., & VAN DOORN, A. J. (1996). Surface gradients, contours, and the perception of surface attitude in images of complex scenes. Perception, 25, 701-713.
13. COSTEN, N. P., PARKER, D. M., & CRAW, I. (1994). Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition. Perception, 23, 129-146.
14. COSTEN, N. P., PARKER, D. M., & CRAW, I. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 602-612.
15. DAVIES, G., ELLIS, H. D., & SHEPHERD, J. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180-187.
16. GALPER, R. E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19, 207-208.
17. GALPER, R. E., & HOCHBERG, J. (1971). Recognition memory for photographs of faces. American Journal of Psychology, 84, 351-354.
18. GIBSON, J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19. HARMON, L. D. (1973, November). The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 229, 71-82.
20. HAYES, A. (1988). Identification of two-tone images; some implications for high- and low-spatial-frequency processes in human vision. Perception, 17, 429-436.
21. HILL, H., & BRUCE, V. (1996). The effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 986-1004.
22. HILL, H., JINNO, Y., & JOHNSTON, A. (2003). Comparing solid-body with point-light animations. Perception, 32, 563-566.
23. HILL, H., SCHYNS, P. G., & AKAMATSU, S. (1997). Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition, 62, 201-222.
24. JOHANSSON, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 201-211.
25. JOHNSTON, A., HILL, H., & CARMAN, N. (1992). Recognizing faces: Effects of lighting direction, inversion, and brightness reversal. Perception, 21, 365-375.
26. KEMP, R., PIKE, G., WHITE, P., & MUSSELMAN, A. (1996). Perception and recognition of normal and negative faces: The role of shape from shading and pigmentation cues. Perception, 25, 37-52.
27. KNILL, D. C. (1998). Surface orientation from texture: Ideal observers, generic observers, and the information content of texture cues. Vision Research, 38, 1655-1682.
28. LEDER, H. (1996). Line drawings of faces reduce configural processing. Perception, 25, 355-366.
29. LI, A., & ZAIDI, Q. (2003). Observer strategies in perception of 3-D shape from isotropic textures: Developable surfaces. Vision Research, 43, 2741-2758.
30. LIU, C. H., & CHAUDHURI, A. (1998). Are there qualitative differences in face recognition between positive and negative? Perception, 27, 1107-1122.
31. LIU, C. H., COLLIN, C. A., BURTON, A. M., & CHAUDHURI, A. (1999). Lighting direction affects recognition of untextured faces in photographic positive and negative. Vision Research, 39, 4003-4009.
32. LIU, C. H., COLLIN, C. A., RAINVILLE, S. J. M., & CHAUDHURI, A. (2000). The effects of spatial frequency overlap on face recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 956-979.
33. LIU, C. H., SEETZEN, H., BURTON, A. M., & CHAUDHURI, A. (2003). Recognition is robust with incongruent image resolution: Relationship to security video images. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 9, 33-41.
34. Moss, J. P., LINNEY, A. D., GRINDROD, S. R., ARRIDGE, S. R., & CLIFTON, J. S. (1987). Three-dimensional visualization of the face and skull using computerized tomography and laser scanning techniques. European Journal of Orthodontics, 9, 247-253.
35. PELI, E., LEE, E., TREMPE, C. L., & BUZNEY, S. (1994). Image enhancement for the visually impaired: The effects of enhancement on face recognition. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 11, 1929-1939.
36. PHILLIPS, R. J. (1972). Why are faces hard to recognize in photographic negative? Perception & Psychophysics, 12, 425-426.
37. RHODES, G., BRENNAN, S., & CAREY, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representation of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473-497.
38. ROSENHOLTZ, R., & MALIK, J. (1997). Surface orientation from texture: Isotropy or homogeneity (or both)? Vision Research, 37, 2283-2293.
39. TARR, M. J., KERSTEN, D., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1998). Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination. Vision Research, 38, 2259-2275.
40. TODD, J. T., & AKERSTROM, R. A. (1987). Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 13, 242-255.
41. TODD, J. T., & OOMES, A. H. J. (2002). Generic and non-generic conditions for the perception of surface shape from texture. Vision Research, 42, 837-850.
42. TROJE, N. F., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
43. TULVING, E., & THOMSON, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352-373.
44. Woo, M., NEIDER, J., & DAVIS, T. (1997). OpenGL programming guide. New York: Addison-Wesley.
45. ZAIDI, Q., & Li, A. (2002). Limitations on shape information provided by texture cues. Vision Research, 42, 815-835.