Does regular cervical screening protect women from microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix? A retrospective case-control study

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 112, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 807-809

  Sykes, Peter H ^a,b   Reddy, Jessamine ^a,c   Peddie, David J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

^b CHRISTCHURCH WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

^c WELLINGTON HOSPITAL   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER STAGING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

ADULT; AGED; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 20744453530     PISSN: 14700328     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00537.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Simcock B, Sykes P, Laney M. The impact of the National Cervical Screening Programme on the presentation of cancer of the cervix in Canterbury. NZ Med J 2001;114:378-380.
2. Sigurdsson K. The Icelandic and Nordic cervical screening programs: trends in incidence and mortality rates through 1995. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1999;78:478-485.
3. Independent Monitoring Group of the National Cervical Screening Programme. Quarterly Report 2 National Cervical Screening Programme January-March 2001. Dunedin: University of Otago, 2001:19-27.
4. Paraskevaidis E, Kitchener HC, Miller ID, Mann E, Jandial L, Fisher PM. A population-based study of microinvasive disease of the cervix-a colposcopic and cytologic analysis. Gynecol Oncol 1993;45:9-12.
5. Sasieni P, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficiency of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-1005.
6. Sasieni P, Adams J, Cuzick J. Benefit of cervical screening at different ages: evidence from the UK audit of screening histories. Br J Cancer 2003;89:88-93.
7. Burghardt E. Pathology of early invasive squamous and glandular carcinoma of the cervix. In: Coppleson M, editor. Gynecologic Oncology. London: Churchill Livingstone, 1992:609-629.
8. Tidbury P, Singer A, Jenkins D. CIN3; the role of lesion size in invasion. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:583-586.
9. Miller GM, Sung HY, Sawaya GF, Kearney KA, Kinney W, Hiatt RA. Screening interval and risk of invasive squamous cell cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:29-37.