Calibrated imputation in surveys under a quasi-model-assisted approach

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B: Statistical Methodology

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 445-458

  Beaumont, Jean François ^a  

^a STATISTICS CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Editing; Estimating function; Imputation model; Non response model; Taylor linearization; Two phase sampling

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744450941     PISSN: 13697412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00511.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Beaumont, J.-F. (2000) On regression imputation in the presence of nonignorable nonresponse. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 580-585.
2. Beaumont, J.-F. and Alavi, A. (2004) Robust generalized regression estimation. Surv. Methodol., 30, 195-208.
3. Beaumont, J.-F. and Mitchell, C. (2002) The System for Estimation of Variance due to Nonresponse and Imputation (SEVANI). In Proc. Statistics Canada Symp. Modeling Survey Data for Social and Economic Research. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
4. Binder, D. A. (1983) On the variances of asymptotically normal estimators from complex surveys. Int. Statist. Rev., 51, 219-292.
5. Deville, J.-C. (2002) Imputation par prediction ou imputation avec aléa? In Recueil des Journées de Méthodologie Statistique. Paris: Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
6. Deville, J.-C. and Särndal, C.-E. (1992) Calibration estimators in survey sampling. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 87, 376-382.
7. Ekholm, A. and Laaksonen, S. (1991) Weighting via response modeling in the Finnish Household Budget Survey. J. Off. Statist., 7, 325-337.
8. Favre, A.-C., Matei, A. and Tillé, Y. (2005) Calibrated random imputation for qualitative data. J. Statist. Planng Inf., 128, 411-425.
9. Haziza, D. and Rao, J. N. K. (2005) A nonresponse model approach to inference under imputation for missing survey data. Submitted to Surv. Methodol.
10. Liu, T.-P. and Rancourt, E. (2001) Constrained categorical imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Working Paper HSMD-2001-012E. Methodology Branch, Statistics Canada, Ottawa.
11. Mantel, H., Nadon, S. and Yeo, D. (2000) Effect of nonresponse adjustments on variance estimates for the National Population Health Survey. Proc. Surv. Res. Meth. Sect. Am. Statist. Ass., 221-226.
12. Mantel, H. J., Singh, A. C. and Yu, M. (1995) Mass imputation for two phase sampling: use of small area estimation and calibration techniques. Proc. Surv. Meth. Sect. Statist. Soc. Can., 57-62.
13. Meng, X. L. (1994) Multiple imputation with uncongenial sources of input (with discussion). Statist. Sci., 9, 538-574.
14. Oh, H. L. and Scheuren, F. J. (1983) Weighting adjustment for unit nonresponse. In Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, vol. 2 (eds W. G. Madow, I. Olkin and D. B. Rubin), pp. 143-184. New York: Academic Press.
15. Rao, J. N. K. and Sitter, R. R. (1995) Variance estimation under two-phase sampling with application to imputation for missing data. Biometrika, 82, 453-460.
16. Ren, R. and Chambers, R. L. (2002) Outlier robust imputation of survey data via reverse calibration. Methodology Working Paper M03/19. Southampton Statistical Sciences Research Institute, University of Southampton, Southampton.
17. Rubin, D. B. (1987) Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. New York: Wiley.
18. Rubin, D. B. (1996) Multiple imputation after 18+ years. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 91, 473-489.
19. Särndal, C.-E. (1992) Methods for estimating the precision of survey estimates when imputation has been used. Surv. Methodol., 18, 241-252.
20. Särndal, C.-E. and Swensson, B. (1987) A general view of estimation for two-phases of selection with applications to two-phase sampling and nonresponse. Int. Statist. Rev., 55, 279-294.
21. Särndal, C.-E., Swensson, B. and Wretman, J. H. (1992) Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.
22. Särndal, C.-E. and Wright, R. L. (1984) Cosmetic form of estimators in survey sampling. Scand. J. Statist., 11, 146-156.
23. Shao, J. and Steel, P. (1999) Variance estimation for survey data with composite imputation and nonnegligible sampling fractions. J. Am. Statist. Ass., 94, 254-265.