The identification of mandible fractures by helical computed tomography and panorex tomography

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 394-399

  Roth, Forrest S ^a,c,d   Kokoska, Mimi S ^a,b,e   Awwad, Eric E ^a,e   Martin, David S ^a,f   Olson, Garth T ^a,g   Hollier, Larry H ^a,c   Hollenbeak, Christopher S ^a,h  

^a Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery ^*

^b Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^d BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f Belleville Memorial Hospital   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

^h PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Mandible fractures; Panorex

Indexed keywords

EDRECOLOMAB;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MANDIBLE FRACTURE; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 20744449141     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000171964.01616.a8     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chayra GA, et al. Comparison of panoramic and standard radiographs for the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:677
2. Markowitz BL, et al. Prospective comparison of axial computed tomography and standard and panoramic radiographs in the diagnosis of mandibular fractures. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:163
3. Wilson IF, et al. Prospective comparison of panoramic tomography (zonography) and helical computed tomography in the diagnosis and operative management of mandibular fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1369
4. Kokoska MS, Citardi MJ. Computer-aided surgical reduction of facial fractures. Facial Plastic Surgery 2000;16(2):169-179
5. Novelline RA, et al. Helical CT in emergency radiology. Radiology 1999;213:321
6. Salvolini U. Traumatic injuries: imaging of facial injuries. Eur Radiol 2002;12:1253-1261
7. Rhea JT, et al. Helical CT and three-dimensional CT of facial and orbital injury. Radiol Clin North Am 1999;37:489
8. Silverman PM. Introduction to principles and clinical practice of helical (spiral) CT protocols. In: Silverman PM (ed). Helical (spiral) Computed Tomography. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998
9. Wilson IF, et al. Contribution of conventional axial computed tomography (non-helical) in conjunction with panoramic tomography (zonography) in evaluating mandibular fractures. Ann Plast Surg 2000;45:415
10. Creasman CN, et al. Computed tomography versus standard radiography in the assessment of fractures of the mandible. Ann Plast Surg 1992;29:109
11. Pretorius ES, Fishman EK. Spiral CT and three-dimensional CT of musculoskeletal pathology. Radiol Clin North Am 1999; 37:953
12. Noyek AM, et al. Sophisticated CT in complex maxillofacial trauma. Laryngoscope 1982;92:1
13. Brink JA. Technical aspects of helical (spiral) CT. Radiol Clin North Am 1995;33:825
14. Landis J, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174
15. Busuito MJ, Smith DJ Jr. Mandible fractures in an urban trauma center. J Trauma 1986;26:826-830
16. Krugger E, Schilli W. Oral and Maxillofacial Traumatology. Chicago: Quintessence Publisher, 1982
17. Guerrissi JO. Fractures of the mandible: is spontaneous healing possible? Why? J Craniofac Surg 2001;12(2):157-166
18. Thai KN, et al. The role of computed tomographic scanning in the management of facial trauma. J Trauma 1997;43:214
19. Shetty V, et al. Clinician variability in characterizing mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:254