Cross-cultural similarities and differences in dynamic stereotypes: A comparison between germany and the united states

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 188-196

  Wilde, Annett ^a   Diekman, Amanda B ^b  

^a University of Koblenz   (Germany)

^b MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744448962     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00181.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Bianchi, S. M. (2000). Maternal employment and time with children: Dramatic change or surprising continuity? Demography, 37, 401-414.
3. Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender-stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 413-423.
4. Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171-1188.
5. Diekman, A. B., Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Ferreira, M. C. (2005). Dynamic stereotypes about women and men in Latin America and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 209-226.
6. Diekman, A. B., & Goodfriend, W. (2004). Evaluation in context: A role congruity perspective on injunctive gender norms. Unpublished manuscript, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
7. Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Evans, C. (2004). Is social change in the eye of the beholder? Exploring individual differences in perceptions and evaluations of dynamic and static stereotypes. Unpublished manuscript, Miami University, Oxford, OH.
8. Diekman, A. B., Goodfriend, W., & Goodwin, S. (2004). Dynamic stereotypes of power: Perceptions of change and stability in gender hierarchies. Sex Roles, 50, 201-215.
9. Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: A current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123-174). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. England, P. (2003). Toward gender equality: Progress and bottlenecks. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.northwestern.edu/ipr/publications/papers/2003/WP-03-13.pdf
11. Fulbrook, M. (2002). History of Germany 1918-2000: The divided nation. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12. Haygne, H. (1986). Rise in mothers' labor force activity includes those with infants. Monthly Labor Review, 189, 43-45.
13. Jarausch, K. H., & Geyer, M. (2003). Shattered past: Reconstructing German histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
14. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1; pp. 233-265). New York: McGraw-Hill.
15. Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
16. Kuenzler, J., Walter, W., Reichart, E., & Pfister, G. (2001). Gender division of labour in unified Germany. Retrieved October 10, 2003, from http://www.uni-wuerzburg.de/soziologie/na_rep.pdf
17. Kuhn, A. (1989). Power and powerlessness: Women after 1945, or the continuity of the ideology of femininity. German History, 7, 35-46.
18. Preacher, K. J., & Leonardelli, G. L. (2003). Calculation for the Sobel Test. An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved September 15, 2003 from http://www.unc.edu/~preacher/sobel/sobel.htm
19. Reichle, B. (1996). Der Traditionalisierungseffekt beim Übergang zur Elternschaft. Zeitschrift für Frauenforschung, 14, 70-89.
20. Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women's inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
21. Rosnow, R. L., & Rosenthal, R. (1988). Focused tests of significance and effect size estimation in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 35, 203-208.
22. Schneewind, K. A. (1998). Kinderwunsch und Konsequenzen der Elternschaft: eine fünfjährige Längsschnittstudie. In K. Hahlweg (Ed.), Prävention von Trennung und Scheidung-Internationale Ansätze zur Prädiktion und Prävention von Beziehungsstörungen (pp. 105-132). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
23. Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.
24. Twenge, J. M. (2001). Changes in women's assertiveness in response to status and roles: A cross-temporal meta-analysis, 1931-1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 133-145.
25. United Nations Statistics Division. (2004). Common statistics database. Retrieved January 15, 2004, from http://unstats.un.org/cgi-bin/uncdb.exe/cdb_as_infotype
26. Vaskovics, L. A., & Rost, H. (1999). Väter und Erziehungsurlaub. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
27. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes. A multination study. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28. Williams, J. E., Satterwhite, R. C., & Best, D. L. (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited: The five factor model. Sex Roles, 40, 513-525.