Discrete choice modelling in airline network management

Journal of Applied Econometrics

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 467-486

  Grammig, Joachim ^a   Hujer, Reinhard ^b   Scheidler, Michael ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20744438762     PISSN: 08837252     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jae.799     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Andersen TG, Bollerslev T. 1997. Intraday periodicity and volatility persistence in financial markets. Journal of Empirical Finance 4: 115-158.
2. Ben-Akiva M, Bolduc D. 1996. Multinomial probit with a logit kernel and a general parametric specification of the covariance structure. Working Paper, Department of Civil Engineering, MIT.
3. Bhat CR. 1997. Covariance heterogeneity in nested logit models: econometric structure and application to intercity travel. Transportation Research B 31(1): 11-21.
4. Bolduc D. 1992. Generalized autoregressive errors in the multinomial probit model. Transportation Research B 26(2): 155-170.
5. Bolduc D, Ben-Akiva M. 1991. A multinomial formulation for large choice sets. In 6th International Conference on Travel Behavior; 224-258.
6. Börsch-Supan A, Hajivassiliou V. 1993. Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. Journal of Econometrics 58: 347-368.
7. Bunch DS. 1991. Estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transportation Research B 25(1): 1-12.
8. Hajivassiliou V, McFadden D. 1998. The method of simulated scores for the estimation of LDV models. Econometrica 66(4): 863-896.
9. Hajivassiliou V, McFadden D, Ruud D. 1996. Simulation of multivariate normal rectangle probabilities: methods and programs. Journal of Econometrics 72(1-2): 85-134.
10. Hausman JA, Wise DA. 1978. A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decision recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica 46(2): 403-426.
11. Horowitz JL. 1983. Statistical comparison of non-nested probabilistic discrete choice models. Transportation Science 17(3): 319-350.
12. Horowitz JL. 1991. Reconsidering the multinomial probit model. Transportation Research B 25(6): 433-438.
13. Ivaldi M, Viauroux C. 1999. A parsimonious approach to multidimensional choice models of urban transport. Working Paper, GREMAQ-EHESS.
14. McFadden D. 1978. Modelling the choice of residential location. In Spatial Interaction Theory and Residential Location, Korlquist A (ed.). North Holland: Amsterdam; 75-96.
15. McFadden D. 1989. A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica 57: 995-1026.
16. McFadden D, Train K. 2000. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. Journal of Applied Econometrics 15: 447-470.
17. Ortuzar JD. 1982. Fundamentals of discrete multinomial choice modelling. Transport Reviews 2(1): 47-78.
18. Train KA. 2002. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press: New York.
19. Williams HCW. 1977. On the formation of travel demand models and economic evaluation measures of user benefit. Environment and Planning A 9: 285-312.
20. Yai T, Iwakura S, Morichi S. 1997. Multinomial probit with structured covariance for route choice behavior. Transportation Research B 31(3): 195-207.