Diamagnetic Orbital Response of Mesoscopic Silver Rings

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 20, 2002, Pages

  Deblock, R ^a   Bel, R ^a   Reulet, B ^a   Bouchiat, H ^a   Mailly, D ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIV PARIS SUD   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BOUNDARY CONDITIONS; FOURIER TRANSFORMS; JOSEPHSON JUNCTION DEVICES; MAGNETIC FLUX; MAGNETIC HYSTERESIS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER; OSCILLATIONS; RESONATORS; SILVER;

SPIN-ORBIT SCATTERING;

MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

EID: 20744432625     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.206803     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. See, e.g., Mesoscopic Phenomena in Solids, edited by B.L. Altshuler, P.A. Lee, and R.A. Webb (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1991);
2. Y. Imry, Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 1997).
3. M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, and R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. 96A, 365 (1983).
4. H. Cheung, E. Riedel, and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.587 62, 587 (1989).
5. G. Montambaux, H. Bouchiat, D. Sigeti, and R. Friesner, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.42.7647 42, 7647 (1990).
6. V. Ambegaokar and U. Eckern, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.381 65, 381 (1990);
7. V. AmbegaokarU. EckernEurophys. Lett. 13, 733–738 (1990);
8. U. Eckern, Z. Phys. B 82, 393 (1991).
9. A. Schmid, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.80 66, 80 (1991).
10. F. Von Oppen and E. Riedel, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.84 66, 84 (1991).
11. B.L. Altshuler, Y. Gefen, and Y. Imry, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.88 66, 88 (1991).
12. V.E. Kravtsov and B.L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.3394 84, 3394 (2000).
13. V. Chandrasekhar et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3578 67, 3578 (1991).
14. D. Mailly, C. Chapelier, and A. Benoit, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2020 70, 2020 (1993).
15. E.M.Q. Jariwala, P. Mohanty, M.B. Ketchen, and R.A. Webb, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1594 86, 1594 (2001).
16. W. Rabaud et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3124 86, 3124 (2001).
17. L.P. Lévy, G. Dolan, J. Dunsmuir, and H. Bouchiat, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2074 64, 2074 (1990);
18. L.P. Lévy, Physica (Amsterdam)PHYBE3 169B, 245 (1991).
19. B. Reulet, M. Ramin, H. Bouchiat, and D. Mailly, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.124 75, 124 (1995).
20. R. Deblock, Y. Noat, H. Bouchiat, B. Reulet, and D.Mailly, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.65.075301 65, 075301 (2002). This present work reports measurements where magnetic and electric responses of the GaAs rings are well separated which was not the case in the previous experiment
21. For a review see, e.g., U. Eckern and P. Schwab, Adv. Phys. 44, 387 (1995);
22. U. EckernP. SchwabJ. Low Temp. Phys.10.1023/A:1013891902631 126, 1291 (2002).
23. P. Mohanty, Ann. Phys. (Leipzig)ANPYA210.1002/(SICI)1521-3889(199911)8:7/9<549::AID-ANDP549>3.0.CO;2-B 8, 549 (1999).
24. A. Gougam, F. Pierre, H. Pothier, D. Esteve, and N. Birge, J. Low Temp. Phys.10.1023/A:1004658404535 118, 447 (2000).
25. A. Kamenev and Y. Gefen, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14474 49, 14?474 (1994).
26. M. Schechter, Y. Oreg, Y. Imry, and Y. Levinson, cond-mat/0205390.
27. B. Altshuler, A. Aronov, and B. Spivak, Pis’ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 33, 101 (1981)
28. B. AltshulerA. AronovB. Spivak[JETP Lett.JTPLA2 33, 94 (1981)].
29. A.G. Aronov and Yu.V. Sharvin, Rev. Mod. Phys.10.1103/RevModPhys.59.755 59, 755 (1987).
30. J. Pieper, J. Price, and J. Martinis, Phys. Rev. B10.1103/PhysRevB.45.3857 45, 3857 (1992).
31. K.B. Efetov, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.2794 66, 2794 (1991).