Comparison of three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labour

European Journal of Anaesthesiology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 30-34

  Siddik Sayyid, S M ^a   Aouad, M T ^a   Jalbout, M I ^a   Zalaket, M I ^a   Mouallem, M R A ^a   Massouh, F M ^a   Rizk, L B ^a   Maarouf, H H ^a   Baraka, Anis S ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

Author keywords

Anaesthesia, obstetrical; Anaesthetics, local, bupivacaine; Analgesia, obstetrical, patient controlled, epidural; Analgesics, opioid, fentanyl

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE; FENTANYL; EPHEDRINE; LOCAL ANESTHETIC AGENT; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG SELF ADMINISTRATION; EPIDURAL ANESTHESIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKING; OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; APGAR SCORE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CESAREAN SECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; DRUG EFFECT; HEART RATE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN; PATIENT CONTROLLED ANALGESIA; PREGNANCY;

ADULT; ANALGESIA, EPIDURAL; ANALGESIA, OBSTETRICAL; ANALGESIA, PATIENT-CONTROLLED; ANESTHETICS, LOCAL; APGAR SCORE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BUPIVACAINE; CESAREAN SECTION; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EPHEDRINE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREGNANCY; VASOCONSTRICTOR AGENTS;

EID: 20644470752     PISSN: 02650215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0265021505000074     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Gambling DR, Yu P, Cole C, McMorland GH, Palmer L. A comparative study of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) and continuous infusion epidural analgesia (CIEA) during labor. Can J Anaesth 1988; 35: 249-254.
2. Peach MJ. Patient controlled epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Int J Obstet Anesthesia 1996; 5: 115-125.
3. Gambling DR, McMorland GH, Yu P, Laszlo C. Comparison of patient controlled epidural analgesia and intermittent top-up injections during labour. Anesth Analg 1990; 70: 256-261.
4. Purdie G, Reid G, Thorburn G, Asbury AJ. Continuous extradural analgesia: comparison of midwife top-ups, continuous infusions and patient-controlled administration. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 580-584.
5. Birnbach DJ. Combined spinal epidural (CSE) and other new techniques for labor analgesia. 51st ASA Annual Refresher Course Lectures and Clinical Update Program. Am Soc Anesthesiol 2000; 114: 1-7.
6. Stienstra R. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia or continuous infusion: advantages and disadvantages of different modes of delivering epidural analgesia for labour. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2000; 13: 253-256.
7. Bernard J-M, Le Roux D, Vizquel L, et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval. Anesth Analg 2000; 90: 328-332.
8. Gambling DR, Huber CJ, Berkowitz J, et al. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40: 211-217.
9. Bromage PR, Camporesi EM, Durant PR, Nielson CH. Influence of epinephrine as an adjunct to epidural morphine. Anesthesiology 1983; 58: 257-262.
10. Ferrante FM, Rosinia FA, Gordon C, Datta S. The role of continuous background infusions in patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor and delivery. Anesth Analg 1994; 79: 80-84.
11. Ferrante FM, Lu L, Jamison SB, Datta S. Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: demand dosing. Anesth Analg 1991; 73: 547-552.
12. Capogna G, Celleno D, Lyons G, Columb M, Fusco P. Minimum local analgesic concentration of extradural bupivacaine increases with progression of labour. Br J Anaesth 1998; 80: 11-13.