Vikings and virtues: A decade of CO2 taxation

Climate Policy

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 13-24

  Andersen, Mikael Skou ^a  

^a NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Climate policy; CO2; Energy; Environmental taxes; Ex post evaluation; Implementation

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; POLLUTION TAX;

EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; WORLD;

EID: 20644454154     PISSN: 14693062     EISSN: 17527457     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2004.9685507     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen, M. S., Dengsøe, N., and Pedersen, A. B., 2001. An Evaluation of the Impact of Green Taxes in the Nordic Countries. Nordic Council of Ministers:TemaNord 2001, 566.
2. Barker, T., 1996. Space Time Economics. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge Econometrics.
3. 2 Taxation and Agreements on Energy Savings, ACEEE Summer Study 1999, Saratoga Springs. New York:American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.
4. Bjørner, T. B., Togeby, M., and Christensen, J., 1998. Industrial Energy Demand:A Micro Panel Data Analysis. Copenhagen, Denmark:AKF Forlaget.
5. Carlsson, A., and Hammar, H., 1996. Energiskatters påverkan på industrins koldioxid- och svavelutsläpp. Vänersborg, Sweden:Länsstyrelsen i Älvsborgs län, Miljö- och planenheten.
6. Clasen, G., 1998. A Framework for Innovation:Corporate Responses to Applied Energy/CO Taxes in Denmark. Rotterdam, The Netherlands:Erasmus Studiecentrum voor Milieukunde.
7. CEU. 1998. Database on Environmental Taxes in EU Can be accessed at http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/index.htm
8. 2-avgift på olje- og gassutvinning i Norge. Delrapport 4 Oslo, Norway::Sammendrag og hovedkonklusjoner. ECON.
9. 2-utslipp på norsk sokkel. Oslo, Norway:ECON.
10. Ekins, P., and Speck, S., 1999. Competitiveness and exemptions from environmental taxes in Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 13:369–396.
11. Energy Agency. 1999a. The Danish Agreements on Energy Efficiency. Copenhagen, Denmark:Energistyrelsen.
12. Energy Agency. 1999b. Opfølgning på Energi 21. Status for energiplanlægning. Copenhagen, Denmark:Energistyrelsen.
13. 2 Pollution:Austria, Denmark and the Netherlands. The Netherlands:Environmental Sociology Publication, Agricultural University Wageningen.
14. Enevoldsen, M., 2000. “ Industrial energy efficiency. ”. In The Voluntary Approach to Environmental Policy:Joint Environmental Policy-making in Europe. Edited by:Mol, A. P., Lauber, V., and Liefferink, J. D., Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
15. Jespersen, J., Mortensen, J. B., and Rummel, R., 1999. Bæredygtig energianvendelse og økonomisk vækst. Hvad skal der til? Hvad koster det? Nogle konsekvensberegningergennemført ved hjælp af Makro- og miljømodellerne Adam og Emma. Research Paper no. 1/99. Roskilde, Denmark:Institut for Samfundsvidenskab og Erhvervsøkonomi, Roskilde Universitetscenter.
16. 2 1987–1994. Environmental and Resource Economics, 9:275–290.
17. Larsen, H., 1999. Energy taxes:the Danish model. In:OECD, Environmental Taxes:Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries. 259–301. Paris:OECD.
18. Lijphart, A., 1975. The comparable cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies, 5:158–177.
19. 2-avgiften virker i petroleumssektoren.
20. Malaska, P., Luukkanen, J., Vehmas, J., and Kaivo-oja, J., 1997. Environment-Based Energy Taxation in the Nordic Countries:Comparisons by Energy Source and a Review of the Finnish Discussion. Helsinki, Finland:Ministry of the Environment.
21. Ministry of Finance. 1999. Evaluering af grønne afgifter og erhvervene. Copenhagen, Denmark:Schultz Information.
22. Naturvårdsverket. 1995. Utvärdering av koldioxidskatten:har utsläppen av koldioxid minskat? Naturvårdsverkets Förlag Stockholm, Sweden
23. Nordic Council of Ministers. 1999. The Use of Economic Instruments in Nordic Environmental Policy 1997–1998 (TemaNord 1999–524) Copenhagen, Denmark:Nordisk Ministerråd. Can be accessed at http://www.norden.org/Pub/miljo/miljo/sk/TN99_524.asp
24. North, D. C., 1993. What do we mean by rationality?. Public Choice, 77:159–162.
25. NUTEK. 1994. Utvärdering av styrmedel och stöd för begränsning av koldioxidutsläpp i Sverige. Stockholm, Sweden:NUTEK.
26. NUTEK. 1997. Styrmedlens inverkan på koldioxidutsläppen. Beräkningar med MARKAL-MACRO modellen. Stockholm, Sweden:NUTEK.
27. OECD. 1997. Evaluating Economic Instruments for Environmental Policy. Paris:OECD.
28. Porter, M., and van der Linde, C., 1995. Towards a new conception of the environment:competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4):97–118.
29. Shopley, J., and Brasseur, D., 1996. Conference on Environmental Economic Policies:Competitiveness and Employment. Summary Report on Two Micro-Economic Case Studies in the Field of Business and the Environment. Arthur D. Brussels, Belgium:Little.
30. Sterner, T., and Löwgren, M., 1994. “ Environmental taxes:a cautious start in Sweden. ”. In Economic Policies for Sustainable Development. Edited by:Sterner, T., 46–67. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
31. Teir, G., 1999. (Environmental) energy taxes:the experience of Finland. In:OECD, Environmental Taxes:Recent Developments in China and OECD Countries. 303–308. Paris:OECD.
32. Vedung, E., 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA:Transaction Publishers.
33. Yin, R. K., 1984. Case Study Research. London:Sage Publications.