Genetic Algorithm inversion of geomagnetic vector data using a 2.5-dimensional magnetic structure model

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 217-227

  Yamamoto, Michiko ^a   Seama, Nobukazu ^b  

^a GEOMAR HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR OCEAN RESEARCH KIEL   (Germany)

^b KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

2.5 D magnetic structure; Genetic Algorithm; Geomagnetic vector data; Near bottom survey

Indexed keywords

GEOMAGNETIC FIELD;

EID: 20644452897     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/BF03353404     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Blakely, R. J., Magnetic models, in Potential Theory in Gravity and Magnetic Applications, pp. 195-213, Cambridge Univ. Press., US, 1995.
2. Carbotte, S. M., J. C. Mutter, and L. Xu, Contribution of volcanism and tectonism to axial and flank morphology of the southern East Pacific Rise, 17°10′-17°40′S, from a study of layer 2A geometry, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 10165-10184, 1997.
3. Goldberg, D. E., Genetic Algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning, Addison-Wesley, US, 1989.
4. Hussenoeder, S. A., M. A. Tivey, and H. Shouten, Direct inversion of potential field from an uneven track with application to the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 3131-3134, 1995.
5. Isezaki, N., A new shipboard three-component magntometer, Geophysics, 51, 1992-1998, 1986.
6. Macdonald, K. C., S. P. Miller, S. P. Huestis, and F. N. Spiess, Three-dimensional modeling of a magnetic reversal boundary from inversion of deep-tow measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 3670-3680, 1980.
7. Mcdonald, K. C., S. P. Miller, B. P. Luyendyk, and T. M. Atwater, Investigation of a Vine-Mattews magnetic lineation from a submersible: the source and character of marine magnetic anomalies, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3403-3418, 1983.
8. Morley, L. W. and A. Larochelle, Paleomagnetism as a means of dating geological events, in Geochronology in Canada, pp. 39-51, Univ. of Toronto Press., Toronto, 1964.
9. Parker, R. L., The rapid calculation of potential anomalies, J. Astron. Soc., 31, 447-455, 1972.
10. Parker, R. L. and S. P. Huestis, The inversion of magnetic anomalies in the presence of topography, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 1587-1593, 1974.
11. Schouten, H., M. A. Tivey, D. J. Fornari, and J. R. Cochran, Central anomaly magnetization high: constraints on the volcanic construction and architecture of seismic layer 2A at a fast-spreading mid-ocean ridge, the EPR at 9°30′-50′N, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 169, 37-50, 1999.
12. Seama, N., Y. Nogi, and N. Isezaki, A new method for precise determination of the position and strike of magnetic boundaries using vector data of the geomagnetic anomaly field, Geophys. J. Int., 113, 115-164, 1993.
13. Seama, N., M. Yamamoto, and N. Isezaki, A newly developed deep-tow three component magnetometer, Eos Trans., AGU, 78(46) Fall Mett., Suppl. 192, 1997.
14. Vacquier, V., The physics of geomagnetism, in Geomagnetism in Marine Geology, pp. 1-9, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1972.
15. Vine, F. J. and D. H. Matthews, Magnetic anomalies over ocean ridges, Nature, 199, 947-949, 1963.
16. Yamamoto, M., N. Seama, and N. Isezaki, Deep-tow vector geomagnetic survey at East Pacific Rise, 18°S, Eos Trans., AGU, 80(46), Fall Mett., Suppl. 1075, 1998.