Modeling the concentration-response function of the herbicide dinoseb on Daphnia magna (survival time, reproduction) and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (growth rate)

Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 17-25

  Chèvre, Nathalie ^a   Brazzale, Alessandra R ^b   Becker Van Slooten, Kristin ^c   Behra, Renata ^a   Tarradellas, Joseph ^c   Guettinger, Herbert ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Daphnia magna survival and reproduction; Dinoseb; Modeling concentration response function; Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata growth

Indexed keywords

DINOSEB;

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; ECOTOXICOLOGY; HERBICIDE; MODELING; TOXICITY TEST;

ALGA; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAPHNIA; ECOTOXICOLOGY; GROWTH CURVE; GROWTH INHIBITION; HERBICIDAL ACTIVITY; LETHALITY; LIFE CYCLE; MOLECULAR MODEL; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTIVE EFFORT; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

2,4-DINITROPHENOL; ALGAE, GREEN; ANIMALS; DAPHNIA; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; HERBICIDES; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NO-OBSERVED-ADVERSE-EFFECT LEVEL; REPRODUCTION; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

ALGAE; DAPHNIA MAGNA; SELENASTRUM CAPRICORNUTUM;

EID: 20644439993     PISSN: 01476513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Y. Allen, P. Calow, and D.J. Baird Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 14 1995 1625 1630
2. R. Altenburger, T. Backhaus, W. Boedecker, M. Faust, M. Scholze, and L.H. Grimme Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 2000 2341 2347
3. T. Backhaus, R. Altenburger, W. Boedeker, M. Faust, M. Scholze, and L.H. Grimme Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 2000 2348 2356
4. C. Barata, D. Baird, A. Miñarro, and A.M.V.M. Soares Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19 2000 2314 2322
5. R. Bellio, J.E. Jensen, and P. Seiden Biometrics 56 2000 1204 1212
6. G. Casella, and R.L. Berger Statistical Inference 1990 Wadsworth Belmont, CA, USA
7. Chèvre, N., 2000. Etude et modélisation des effets écotoxiques d'un micropolluant organique sur Daphnia magna et Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Ph.D. Thesis 2117, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne.
8. N. Chèvre, K. Becker-van Slooten, J. Tarradellas, A.R. Brazzale, R. Behra, and H. Guettinger Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 21 2002 828 833
9. E.R. Christensen, and N. Nyholm Environ. Sci. Technol. 18 1984 713 718
10. R.D. Cook, and S. Weisberg Residuals and Influence in Regression 1982 Chapman & Hall New York
11. B.P. Elendt, and W.R. Brias Water Res. 24 1990 1157 1167
12. G.E. Foog, and B. Thake Algal Cultures and Phytoplankton Ecology 1987 University of Wisconsin Press Madison
13. V.E. Forbes, and T.L. Forbes Ecotoxicology in Theory and Practice 1994 Chapman & Hall London
14. G.P. Genoni, R. Behra, C.L. Montague, H. Güttinger, and R. Ternay-Aegerter Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 48 2001 235 240
15. L. Guilhermino, O. Sobral, C. Chastinet, R. Ribeiro, F. Gonçalves, C.M. Silva, and A.M.V.M. Soares Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 42 1999 67 74
16. K. Hawxby, B. Tubea, J. Ownby, and E. Basler Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 7 1977 203 209
17. W.J. Hayes, and E.R.J. Laws Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology 1991 Academic Press San Diego
18. P. Isnard, P. Flammarion, G. Roman, M. Babut, Ph. Bastien, S. Bintein, L. Esserméant, J.F. Férard, S. Gallotti-Schmitt, E. Saouter, M. Saroli, H. Thiébaud, R. Tomassone, and E. Vindimian Chemosphere 45 2001 659 669
19. J.D. Kalbleisch, and R.L. Prentice The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data 1980 Wiley New York
20. D.D. Kaufman Phenols P.C. Kearney D.D. Kaufman Herbicides Chemistry, Degradation and Mode of Action second ed 1975 Dekker New York
21. S.A.L.M. Kooijman Dynamic Energy Budgets in Biological Systems 1993 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK
22. P. Kudsk, and J.C. Streibig Formulations and adjuvants J.C. Streibig P. Kudsk Herbicide Bioassays 1993 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL 99 117
23. Miller, W.E., Greene, J.C., Shiroyama, T., 1978. The Selenastrum capricornutum Printz Algal Assay Bottle Test: Experimental Design, Application and Data Interpretation Protocol. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, OR.
24. D.R.J. Moore, and P.-Y. Caux Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16 1997 794 801
25. M.C. Newman, and M.A. Unger Fundamentals of Ecotoxicology second ed 2003 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL
26. OECD, 1998a. OECD Series on Testing Assessment Number 10: Report of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development Workshop on Statistical Analysis of Aquatic Toxicity Data, ENV/MC/CHEM(98). Environmental Health & Safety Publication, Paris.
27. OECD, 1998b. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Guidelines for Testing Chemicals: Proposal for Updating Guideline 202, Part II: Daphnia magna Reproduction Test. Environmental Health & Safety Publication, Paris.
28. N. Perrin, M.C. Bradley, and P. Calow OKOS 59 1990 70 74
29. G. Persoone, and C.R. Janssen Field validation of predictions based on laboratory toxicity tests I.R. Hill F. Heimbach P. Leeuwangh P. Matthiessen Freshwater Field Tests for Hazard Assessment of Chemicals 1994 Lewis Boca Raton, FL 379 397
30. J.L. Sebaugh, J.D. Wilson, M.W. Tucker, and W.J. Adams Risk Anal. 11 1991 633 640
31. M.G.D. Smit, A.J. Hendricks, J.H.M. Schobben, C.C. Karman, and P.M. Schobben Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 48 2001 43 50
32. C.E. Stephan, and J.W. Rogers Advantages of using regression analysis to calculate results of chronic toxicity tests R.C. Bahner D.J. Hansen Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment Eighth Symposium, STP 891 1985 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia 328 338
33. B.E. Taylor Arch. Hydrobiol. Beiheft Ergebnisse Limnol. 21 1985 285 296
34. N.M. Van Straalen Environmetrics 8 1997 249 253