Correlating sensory effects with irritation

Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-52

  Farage, Miranda A ^a   Santana, Marie Vee ^a   Henley, Elizabeth ^a  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Behind the knee test; Cutaneous effects and exploratory procedures; Descriptive analysis panel; Erythema; Feminine hygiene pads; Sensory effects; Skin irritation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERYTHEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYGIENE; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; SAFETY; SKIN BURNING SENSATION; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN TEST; TAMPON; TEXTILE;

EID: 20544478308     PISSN: 07313829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/CUS-200046189     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Simion FA, Rhein LD, Morrison BM, Scala DD, Salko, DM, Kligman AM. Self-perceived sensory responses to soap and synthetic detergent bars correlate with clinical signs of irritation. J Am Acad Dermatol 1995; 32:205-211.
2. Bannan EA, Griffith JF, Nusair TL, Sauers LJ. Skin testing of laundered fabrics in the dermal safety assessment of enzyme-containing detergents. J Toxicol Cutan Ocular Toxicol 1992; 11:327-339.
3. Barel AO, Lambrecht R, Clarys P, Morrison BM, Paye M. A comparative study of the effects on the skin of a classical bar soap and a syndet cleansing bar in normal use conditions and in the soap chamber test. Skin Research and Technology 2001; 7:98-104.
4. Christensen M, Kligman AM. An improved procedure for conducting lactic acid stinging tests on facial skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1996; 4:1-11.
5. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977; 28:197-209.
6. Farage MA, Gilpin DA, Enane NA, Baldwin S. Development of a new test for mechanical irritation: behind the knee as a test site. Skin Research and Technology 2001; 7:193-203.
7. Farage MA, Meyer S, Walter D. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin. Skin Research and Technology 2004; 10:85-95.