Routine surveillance care after cancer treatment with curative intent

Medical Care

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 592-599

  Lafata, Jennifer Elston ^a   Simpkins, Jan ^a   Schultz, Lonni ^a   Chase, Gary A ^b   Johnson, Christine Cole ^a   Yood, Marianne Ulcickas ^a,c   Lamerato, Lois ^a   Nathanson, David ^a   Cooper, Greg ^d  

^a HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b PENN STATE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cancer care; Cancer survivors; Utilization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CANCER THERAPY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENDOMETRIUM CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; LUNG CANCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL RECORD; METASTASIS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROSTATE CANCER; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM; PATIENT CARE; REGISTER; STATISTICS; SURVIVOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; DIAGNOSTIC TESTS, ROUTINE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; NEOPLASM METASTASIS; NEOPLASMS; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; REGISTRIES; SURVIVORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 20544474655     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000163656.62562.c4     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Endometrial Cancer. Practice Guidelines in Oncology, v. 1. 2001, ENDO-10. 05/01/02. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed March 25, 2005.
2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Small Cell Lung Cancer. Practice Guidelines in Oncology - v. 1. 2002, SCL-5. 09/04/01. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed March 25, 2005.
3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Prostate Cancer. Practice Guidelines in Oncology - v. 1. 2002, Pros-1. 01/07/02. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed March 25, 2005.
4. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Colon Cancer. Practice Guidelines in Oncology - v. 1. 2002, COL-3/REC-2. 04/12/02 & 09/10/01. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed March 25, 2005.
5. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Breast Cancer. Practice Guidelines in Oncology - v. 2. 2002, BNON-1/ BNON-4. 03/15/02. Available at: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp#site. Accessed March 25, 2005.
6. Desch CE, Benson AB III, Smith TJ, et al. Recommended colorectal cancer surveillance guidelines by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. ASCO Special Article. 0732-183X/99/1704-1312. 2-2-1999. Alexandria, VA: American Society of Clinical Oncology.
7. Smith TJ, Davidson NE, Schapira DV, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology 1998 update of recommended breast cancer surveillance guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1080-1082.
8. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997;112:594-642.
9. The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center. Clinical & Scientific Resources. Guidelines by Disease Site. 2001. Available at: http://www.mdanderson.org/Cancer_Pro/CS_Resources. Accessed March 25, 2005.
10. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:1035-1041.
11. The Steering Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Care and Treatment of Breast Cancer. Follow-up after treatment for breast cancer. CMAJ. 1998;158(Suppl 3):S65-S70.
12. Vine MF, Degnan D, Hanchette C. Geographic information systems: their use in environmental epidemiologic research. Environ Health Perspect. 1997;105:598-605.
13. Makela J, Laitinen S, Kairaluoma MI. Early results of follow-up after radical resection for colorectal cancer. Preliminary results of a prospective randomized trial. Surg Oncol. 1992;1:157-161.
14. Kjeldsen BJ, Kronborg O, Fenger C, et al. A prospective randomized study of follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1996;84:666-669.
15. Ohlsson B, Breland U, Ekberg H, et al. Follow-up after curative surgery for colorectal carcinoma: Randomized comparison with no follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:619-626.
16. Shoemaker D, Black R, Giles L, et al. Yearly colonoscopy, liver CT, and chest radiography do not influence 5-year survival of colorectal cancer patients. Gastroenterology. 1998;114:7-14.
17. Makela JT, Laitinen SO, Kairaluoma MI. Five-year follow-up after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 1995;130:1062-1067.
18. Scanlon EF, Ovieda MA, Cunningham MP, et al. Preoperative and follow-up procedures on patients with breast cancer. Cancer. 1980;46:977-979.
19. Interdisciplinary Group for Cancer Care Evaluation (GIVIO Investigators). Impact of follow-up testing on survival and health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients. A multicenter randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1994;271:1587-1592.
20. Broyn T, Froyen J. Evaluation of routine follow-up after surgery for breast carcinoma. Acta Chir Scand. 1982;148:401-404.
21. Kjeldsen BJ, Thorsen H, Whalley D, et al. Influence of follow-up on health related quality of life after radical surgery for colorectal cancer. Scan J Gastroenterol. 1999;5:509-515.
22. Stiggelbout AM, de Haes JCJM, Vree R, et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer patients: quality of life and attitudes towards follow-up. Br J Cancer. 1997;75:914-920.
23. Rosen M, Chan L, Beart RW Jr. , et al. Follow-up of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:1116-1126.
24. Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP, et al. Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. BMJ. 2002;324:813.
25. Elston Lafata J, Johnson CC, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Sociodemographic differences in the receipt of colorectal cancer surveillance following treatment with curative intent. Med Care. 2001;39:361-372.
26. Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Chak A, et al. Geographic and patient variation among Medicare beneficiaries in the use of follow-up testing after surgery for nonmetastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer. 1999;85:2124-2131.
27. Ellison GL, Warren JL, Knopf KB, et al. Racial differences in the receipt of bowel surveillance following potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Health Serv Res. 2003;38:1885-1903.
28. Schapira MM, McAuliffe TL, Nattinger AB. Underutilization of mammography in older breast cancer survivors. Med Care. 2000;38:281-289.
29. Andersen MR, Urban N. The use of mammography by survivors of breast cancer. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1713-1714.