Behavior of various orbital implants under axial compression

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 225-229

  Jordan, David R ^a,c   Ahuja, Nina ^a   Gilberg, Steven ^a   Bouchard, Real ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^b ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

^c NONE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLYETHYLENE; POLYLACTIC ACID; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID;

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPRESSION; FORCE; MATERIAL STATE; ORBIT IMPLANT; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNIQUE; WEIGHT BEARING;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DURAPATITE; LACTIC ACID; ORBITAL IMPLANTS; POLYETHYLENES; POLYMERS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 20544473672     PISSN: 07409303     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.IOP.0000162959.30970.0D     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Perry AC. Advances in enucleation. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1991;4:173-82.
2. Byrd WA. Coralline hydroxyapatite orbital implant. Ophthal Practice 1991;9:6262-5.
3. Dutton JJ. Coralline hydroxyapatite as an ocular implant. Ophthalmology 1991;98:370-7.
4. Hornblass A, Biesman BS, Eviator JA. Current techniques of enucleation: a survey of 5,439 intraorbital implants and a review of the literature. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;11:77-88.
5. Jordan DR. Anophthalmic orbital implants. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2000;587-608.
6. Jordan DR, Munro SM, Brownstein S, et al. A synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: the so-called counterfeit implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1992;14:244-9.
7. Karesh JW, Dresner SC. High density porous polyethylene (Medpor) as a successful anophthalmic socket implant. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1688-96.
8. Goldberg RA, Dresner SC, Braslow RA, et al. Animal model of porous polyethylene orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1995;10:104-9.
9. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn L, et al. The synthetic hydroxyapatite implant: a report on 65 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:250-5.
10. Rubin PAD, Popham J, Rumeldts S, et al. Enhancement of the cosmetic and functional outcome of enucleation with the conical orbital implant. Ophthalmology 1998;5:919-25.
11. Dei Cas R, Maus M, Bilyk J, et al. Gore-Tex as an orbital implant material. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;14:425-31.
12. Jordan DR, Pelletier C, Gilberg S, et al. The Chinese implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;15:420-4.
13. Hicks CR, Clayton AB, Vijayasekaran S, et al. Development of a poly 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate orbital implant allowing direct muscle attachment and tissue ingrowth. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;15:326-32.
14. Jordan DR, Mawn L, Brownstein S, et al. The bioceramic implant: a new generation of porous orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;16:347-55.
15. Jordan DR, Hwang I, Gilberg S, et al. The Brazilian implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16:363-9.
16. Jordan DR, Hwang I, Gilberg S, et al. The Molteno® M-Sphere. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2000;16:356-62.
17. 3). Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;17: 184-90.
18. Anderson RL, Yen MT, Lucci LM, et al. The quasi-integrated porous polyethylene orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;18:50-5.
19. Perry JD, Goldberg RA, McCann JD, et al. Bovine hydroxyapatite orbital implant: a preliminary report. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002;18:268-74.
20. Jordan DR, Brownstein S, Gilberg S, et al. Investigation of a bioresorbable orbital implant. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 18:342-8.
21. Jordan DR, Gilberg S, Mawn LA. The bioceramic orbital implant: experience with 107 patients. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 19:128-35.
22. Jordan DR, Chan S, Mawn L, et al. Complications associated with pegging hydroxyapatite orbital implants. Ophthalmology 1999; 106:505-12.
23. Jordan DR. Repairing the hole in hydroxyapatite orbital implants following peg removal. Ophthal Surg Lasers 2000;31: 438-40.
24. Jordan DR. Problems after evisceration surgery with porous orbital implants. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;20:374-80.