The temporal flexibility of attentional selection in the visual cortex

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 183-187

  Hopf, Jens Max ^a   Schoenfeld, Mircea Ariel ^a   Heinze, Hans Jochen ^a  

^a OTTO VON GUERICKE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; TEMPORAL CORTEX; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION; WORKING MEMORY; ANIMAL; PHYSIOLOGY; TIME;

ANIMALS; ATTENTION; HUMANS; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 20544469965     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.008     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Desimone R, Duncan J: Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995, 18:193-222.
2. Duncan J, Humphreys GW, Ward RM: Competitive brain activity in visual attention. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1997, 7:255-261.
3. Reynolds JH, Chelazzi L, Desimone R: Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J Neurosci 1999, 19:1736-1753.
4. Kastner S, Ungerleider LG: The neural basis of biased competition in human visual cortex. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1263-1276.
5. Corbetta M, Shulman GL: Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002, 3:201-215.
6. O'Connor DH, Fukui MM, Pinsk MA, Kastner S: Attention modulates responses in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:1203-1209.
7. Tootell RBH, Hadjikhani N, Hall EK, Marrett S, Vanduffel W, Vaughan JT, Dale AM: The retinotopy of visual spatial attention. Neuron 1998, 21:1409-1422.
8. Gandhi SP, Heeger DJ, Boynton GM: Spatial attention affects brain activity in human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:3314-3319.
9. Martinez A, Anllo-Vento L, Sereno MI, Frank LR, Buxton RB, Dubowitz DJ, Wong EC, Hinrichs H, Heinze HJ, Hillyard SA: Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:364-369.
10. Ress D, Backus BT, Heeger DJ: Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:940-945.
11. Noesselt T, Hillyard S, Woldorff M, Schoenfeld A, Hagner T, Jancke L, Tempelmann C, Hinrichs H, Heinze H: Delayed striate cortical activation during spatial attention. Neuron 2002, 35:575-587.
12. Di Russo F, Martinez A, Hillyard SA: Source analysis of event-related cortical activity during visuo-spatial attention. Cereb Cortex 2003, 13:486-499. This was a combined ERP and fMRI study that used inverse dipole modeling to investigate the time course of visuospatial attention effects in the early visual cortex. Attention-related ERP modulations were modeled with current dipoles in several striate and extrastriate regions between 80 ms and 200 ms after stimulus onset. The earliest ERP response (onset = 50 ms) triggered by the stimulus was modeled with a dipole located in the primary visual cortex, and was not modulated by attention. By contrast, longer latency attentional modulations were observed to originate from the striate cortex. The data suggest that attention effects in the human primary visual cortex reflect delayed feedback activity from higher-order visual areas.
13. Corbetta M, Miezin FM, Dobmeyer S, Shulman GL, Petersen SE: Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. Science 1990, 248:1556-1559.
14. Heinze HJ, Mangun GR, Burchert W, Hinrichs H, Scholz M, Münte TF, Gös A, Scherg M, Johannes S, Hundeshagen H et al.: Combined spatial and temporal imaging of brain activity during visual selective attention in humans. Nature 1994, 372:543-546.
15. Chawla D, Rees G, Friston KJ: The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:671-676.
16. Hopfinger JB, Buonocore MH, Mangun GR: The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nat Neurosci 2000, 3:284-291.
17. Saenz M, Buracas GT, Boynton GM: Global effects of feature-based attention in human visual cortex. Nat Neurosci 2002, 5:631-632.
18. Kastner S, De Weerd P, Desimone R, Ungerleider LG: Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI. Science 1998, 282:108-111.
19. Pinsk MA, Doniger GM, Kastner S: Push-pull mechanism of selective attention in human extrastriate cortex. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92:622-629. In this study, observers viewed two sets of superimposed color images, with one set presented to the left and one to the right visual field. The task was to identify a target image among these blends. The attentional load was varied by changing the degree of cross-fading between images, which renders target discrimination more versus less difficult. fMRI data showed that enhancing attentional load is accompanied by an enhancement of the BOLD signal in midlevel visual areas (V4, TEO), corresponding with the target location. At the same time, enhanced attentional load caused a signal decrease in midlevel visual areas, corresponding with the unattended image location. In line with the biased competition model, the data suggest that attention modulates processing in the midlevel visual cortex via a load-dependent push-pull mechanism.
20. Serences JT, Yantis S, Culberson A, Awh E: Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J Neurophysiol 2004, 92:3538-3545. This fMRI study investigated whether location cueing operates in the visual cortex by preparatory enhancement of input at attended locations or by suppression of input at distractor locations, or both. Observers are asked to identify items at cued locations in stimulus arrays that either do or do not contain distractor items. Observers are also cued to the probability (80% versus 20%) of whether distractors will appear in the upcoming array. It is found that when distractor items are highly probable, an anticipatory signal enhancement appears in retinotopic regions, corresponding with the stimulus location. By contrast, no anticipatory signal change is observed when the occurrence of distractors is improbable, indicating that cue-evoked preparatory signal enhancement reflects input suppression in anticipation of upcoming distractor items.
21. Yantis S, Serences JT: Cortical mechanisms of space-based and object-based attentional control. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2003, 13:187-193.
22. Bundesen C: Visual selection of features and objects: is location special? A reinterpretation of Nissen's (1985) findings. Percept Psychophys 1991, 50:87-89.
23. Baylis GC, Driver J: Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1993, 19:451-470.
24. O'Craven KM, Downing PE, Kanwisher N: fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection. Nature 1999, 401:584-587.
25. Vecera SP, Farah MJ: Does visual attention select objects or locations? J Exp Psychol Gen 1994, 123:146-160.
26. Cave KR, Pashler H: Visual selection mediated by location: selecting successive visual objects. Percept Psychophys 1995, 57:421-432.
27. Blaser E, Pylyshyn ZW, Holcombe AO: Tracking an object through feature space. Nature 2000, 408:196-199.
28. Hillyard SA, Anllo-Vento L: Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:781-787.
29. Luck SJ, Woodman GF, Vogel EK: Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn Sci 2000, 4:432-440.
30. Hillyard SA, Münte TF: Selective attention to color and location: an analysis with event-related brain potentials. Percept Psychophys 1984, 36:185-198.
31. Mangun GR: Neural mechanisms of visual selective attention. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:4-18.
32. Wijers AA, Mulder G, Okita T, Mulder UM, Scheffers MK: Attention to color: an analysis of selection, controlled search, and motor activation, using event-related potentials. Psychophysiology 1989, 26:89-109.
33. Anllo-Vento L, Hillyard SA: Selective attention to the color and direction of moving stimuli: electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical feature selection. Percept Psychophys 1996, 58:191-206.
34. Eimer M: An event-related potential (ERP) study of transient and sustained visual attention to color and form. Biol Psychol 1997, 44:143-160.
35. Kenemans JL, Lijffijt M, Camfferman G, Verbaten MN: Split-second sequential selective activation in human secondary visual cortex. J Cogn Neurosci 2002, 14:48-61.
36. Mangun GR, Hillyard SA: Modulations of sensory-evoked potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1991, 17:1057-1074.
37. Vogel EK, Luck S: The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. Psychophysiology 2000, 37:190-203.
38. Hopf JM, Vogel E, Woodman G, Heinze HJ, Luck SJ: Localizing visual discrimination processes in time and space. J Neurophysiol 2002, 88:2088-2095.
39. Luck SJ, Hillyard SA: Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. Psychophysiology 1994, 31:291-308.
40. Girelli M, Luck SJ: Are the same attentional mechanisms used to detect visual search targets defined by color, orientation, and motion? J Cogn Neurosci 1997, 9:238-253.
41. Woodman GF, Luck SJ: Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search. Nature 1999, 400:867-869.
42. Woodman GF, Luck SJ: Serial deployment of attention during visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2003, 29:121-138.
43. Hopf J-M, Luck SJ, Girelli M, Hagner T, Mangun GR, Scheich H, Heinze H-J: Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. Cereb Cortex 2000, 10:1233-1241.
44. Tsal Y, Lavie N: Attending to color and shape: the special role of location in selective visual processing. Percept Psychophys 1988, 44:15-21.
45. Motter BC: Neural correlates of attentive selection for color or luminance in extrastriate area V4. J Neurosci 1994, 14:2178-2189.
46. Treue S, Martinez-Trujillo JC: Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex. Nature 1999, 399:575-579.
47. McAdams CJ, Maunsell JH: Attention to both space and feature modulates neuronal responses in macaque area V4. J Neurophysiol 2000, 83:1751-1755.
48. Treue S: Neural correlates of attention in primate visual cortex. Trends Neurosci 2001, 24:295-300.
49. Hopf JM, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld A, Luck SJ, Heinze H-J: Attention to features precedes attention to locations in visual search: evidence from electromagnetic brain responses in humans. J Neurosci 2004, 24:1822-1832.
50. Egeth HE, Virzi RA, Garbat H: Searching for conjunctively defined targets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1984, 10:32-39.
51. Luck SJ, Girelli M, McDermott MT, Ford MA: Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cognit Psychol 1997, 33:64-87.
52. Hopf JM, Boelmans K, Schoenfeld AM, Heinze H-J, Luck SJ: How does attention attenuate target-distractor interference in vision? Evidence from magnetoencephalographic recordings. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002, 15:17-29.
53. Chelazzi L, Miller EK, Duncan J, Desimone R: A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 1993, 363:345-347.
54. Chelazzi L, Miller EK, Duncan J, Desimone R: Responses of neurons in macaque area V4 during memory-guided visual search. Cereb Cortex 2001, 11:761-772.
55. Maunsell JHR, McAdams CJ: Effects of attention on the responsiveness and selectivity of individual neurons in visual cerebral cortex. In Visual Attention and Cortical Circuits. Edited by Braun J, Koch C, Davis JL. MIT Press; 2001:103-119.
56. Duncan J: Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J Exp Psychol Gen 1984, 113:501-517.
57. Duncan J, Nimmo-Smith I: Objects and attributes in divided attention: surface and boundary systems. Percept Psychophys 1996, 58:1076-1084.
58. Luck SJ, Vogel EK: The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390:279-281.
59. Driver J: Object segmentation and visual neglect. Behav Brain Res 1995, 71:135-146.
60. Driver J: Attention and segmentation. Psychologist 1996:119-123.
61. Roelfsema PR, Lamme VAF, Spekreijse H: Object-based attention in the primary visual cortex of the macaque monkey. Nature 1998, 395:376-381.
62. Valdes-Sosa M, Bobes MA, Rodriguez V, Pinilla T: Switching attention without shifting the spotlight object-based attentional modulation of brain potentials. J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:137-151.
63. Schoenfeld MA, Tempelmann C, Martinez A, Hopf JM, Sattler C, Heinze HJ, Hillyard SA: Dynamics of feature binding during object- selective attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:11806-11811.
64. Muller NG, Kleinschmidt A: Dynamic interaction of object- and space-based attention in retinotopic visual areas. J Neurosci 2003, 23:9812-9816. Symbolic cueing is used to direct observers' attention to a spatially defined part of an object. Consistent with an object-based mechanism, attention causes fMRI signal enhancements in retinotopic regions, corresponding with uncued parts of the attended object. In addition, activity is enhanced at cued locations, relative to uncued locations, within the attended object, suggesting that location- and object-based mechanisms operate in a parallel synergistic manner.
65. Serences JT, Schwarzbach J, Courtney SM, Golay X, Yantis S: Control of object-based attention in human cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004, 14:1346-1357. This study provides new evidence from event-related fMRI regarding cortical structures involved in the control of object-based attention. It was observed that shifting attention between superimposed objects (faces, houses) is reflected by transient signal enhancements in the posterior parietal and frontal cortex areas. Similar control areas have been identified previously for spatial shifts of attention [5], suggesting that these areas are part of a domain-general attentional control circuit.
66. Fink GR, Dolan RJ, Halligan PW, Marshall JC, Frith CD: Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. Brain 1997, 120:2013-2028.
67. Nakayama K, Shimojo S: Experiencing and perceiving visual surfaces. Science 1992, 257:1357-1363.