Optimal check size and reversal rate to elicit pattern-reversal MEG responses

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 218-224

  Chen, Wei Ta ^a,b   Ko, Yu Chieh ^a   Liao, Kwong Kum ^a   Hsieh, Jen Chuen ^a   Yeh, Tzu Chen ^a   Wu, Zin An ^a   Ho, Low Tone ^a   Lin, Yung Yang ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b TAIPEI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c TAIPEI VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CELL ACTIVATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED VISUAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAGNETIC FIELD; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTORY PERIOD; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 20544469455     PISSN: 03171671     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0317167100004005     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Török B, Meyer M, Wildberger H. The influence of pattern size on amplitude, latency and wave form of retinal and cortical potentials elicited by checkerboard pattern reversal and stimulus onset-offset. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 13-19.
2. Plant GT, Hess RF. Temporal frequency discrimination in optic neuritis and multiple sclerosis. Brain 1985; 108: 647-676.
3. Novak GP, Wiznitzer M, Kurtzberg D, Giesser BS, Vaughan HG Jr. The utility of visual evoked potentials using hemifield stimulation and several check sizes in the evaluation of suspected multiple sclerosis. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1988; 71: 1-9.
4. Merigan WH, Maunsell JHR. How parallel are the primate visual pathways? Ann Rev Neurosci 1993; 16: 369-402.
5. Oelkers R, Grosser K, Lang E, et al. Visual evoked potentials in migraine patients: alterations depend on pattern spatial frequency. Brain 1999; 122: 1147-1155.
6. Kergoat H, Kergoat M-J, Justino L, et al. Visual retinocortical function in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Gerontology 2002; 48: 197-203.
7. Kurita-Tashima S, Tobimatsu S, Nakayama-Hiromatsu M, Kato M. Effect of check size on the pattern reversal visual evoked potential. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80: 161-166.
8. Hämäläinen M, Hari R, Ilmoniemi RJ, Knuutila J, Lounasmaa OV. Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain. Rev Mod Phys 1993; 65: 413-497.
9. Barrett G, Blumhardt L, Halliday AM, Halliday E, Kriss A. A paradox in the lateralisation of the visual evoked response. Nature 1976; 261: 253-255.
10. Nakamura A, Kakigi R, Hoshiyama M, et al. Visual evoked cortical magnetic fields to pattern reversal stimulation. Cogn Brain Res 1997; 6: 9-22.
11. Brecelj J, Kakigi R, Koyama S, Hoshiyama M. Visual evoked magnetic responses to central and peripheral stimulation: simultaneous VEP recordings. Brain Topogr 1998; 10: 227-237.
12. Ahlfors SP, Ilmoniemi RJ, Hämäläinen MS. Estimates of visually evoked cortical currents. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 82: 225-236.
13. Nakamura M, Kakigi R, Okusa T, Hoshiyama M, Watanabe K. Effects of check size on pattern reversal visual evoked magnetic field and potential. Brain Res 2000; 872: 77-86.
14. Hashimoto T, Kashii S, Kikuchi M, et al. Temporal profile of visual evoked responses to pattern-reversal stimulation analyzed with a whole-head magnetometer. Exp Brain Res 1999; 125: 375-382.
15. Chiappa KH, Gill EM, Lentz KE. Effect of check size on P100 latency. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1985; 61: 29P-30P.
16. Silveira LC, Perry VH. The topography of magnocellular projecting ganglion cells (M-ganglion cells) in the primate retina. Neuroscience 1991; 40: 217-237.
17. Anderson SJ, Burr DC. Receptive field size of human motion detection units. Vision Res 1987; 27: 621-635.
18. Fylan F, Holliday IE, Singh KD, Anderson SJ, Harding GFA. Magnetoencephalographic investigation of human cortical area V1 using color stimuli. Neuroimage 1997; 6: 47-57.
19. Trick GL, Wintermeyer DH. Spatial and temporal frequency tuning of pattern-reversal retinal potentials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1982; 23: 774-779.
20. Bodis-Wollner I, Brannan JR, Nicoll J, Frkovic S, Mylin LH. A short latency cortical component of the foveal VEP is revealed by hemifield stimulation. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1992; 84: 201-208.
21. Onofrj M, Fulgente T, Thomas A, et al. Visual evoked potentials generator model derived from different spatial frequency stimuli of visual field regions and magnetic resonance imaging coordinates of V1, V2, V3 areas in man. Int J Neurosci 1995; 83: 213-239.
22. Allison T, Hume AL, Wood CC, Goff WR. Developmental and aging changes in somatosensory, auditory and visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1984; 58: 14-24
23. Previc FH. The neurophysiological significance of the N1 and P1 components of the visual evoked potential. Clin Vision Sci 1988; 3: 195-202.
24. Stockard JJ, Hughes JF, Sharbrough FW. Visually evoked potentials to electronic pattern reversal: latency variations with gender, age, and technical factors. Am J EEG Technol 1979; 19: 171-204.
25. Celesia GG, Bodis-Wollner I, Chatrian GE, et al. Recommended standards for electroretinograms and visual evoked potentials. Report of an IFCN Committee. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 87: 421-436.
26. Uusitalo MA, Jousmäki V, Hari R. Activation trace lifetime of human cortical responses evoked by apparent visual motion. Neurosci Lett 1997; 224: 45-48.
27. Tzelepi A, Ioannides AA, Poghosyan V. Early (N70m) neuromagnetic signal topography and striate and extrastriate generators following pattern onset quadrant stimulation. Neuroimage 2001; 13: 702-718.
28. Strucl M, Prevec TS, Zidar I. Dependence of visual evoked potentials on change of stimulated retinal area associated with different pattern displacements. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol 1982; 53: 634-642.
29. Maier J, Dagnelie G, Spekreijse H, van Dijk BW. Principal components analysis for source localization of VEPs in man. Vision Res 1987; 27: 165-177.
30. Hoshiyama M, Kakigi R. Effects of attention on pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials: foveal field stimulation versus peripheral field stimulation. Brain Topogr 2001; 13: 293-298.
31. Vleugels L, Charlier M, van Nunen A, et al. Temporal resolution deficits in the visual fields of MS patients. Vision Res 1999; 39: 2429-2438.