Repeatability of autorefraction and axial length measurements after laser in situ keratomileusis

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1025-1034

  Bailey, Melissa D ^a   Twa, Michael D ^a   Mitchell, G Lynn ^a   Dhaliwal, Deepinder K ^b   Jones, Lisa A ^a   McMahon, Timothy T ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE AXIS LENGTH; HUMAN; KERATOMILEUSIS; MEASUREMENT; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MYOPIA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RELIABILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; OPHTHALMOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 20544469276     PISSN: 08863350     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.040     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. M.A. Bullimore, L.A. Jones, and M.L. Moeschberger A retrospective study of myopia progression in adult contact lens wearers Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43 2002 2110 2113
2. J. Gwiazda, L. Hyman, and M. Hussein A randomized clinical trial of progressive addition lenses versus single vision lenses on the progression of myopia in children Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44 2003 1492 1500
3. J.J. Walline, D.O. Mutti, and L.A. Jones The Contact Lens and Myopia Progression (CLAMP) Study: design and baseline data Optom Vis Sci 78 2001 223 233
4. K. Zadnik, R.E. Manny, and J.A. Yu Ocular component data in school children as a function of age and gender Optom Vis Sci 80 2003 226 236
5. K. Zadnik, D.O. Mutti, and A.J. Adams The repeatability of measurement of the ocular components Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 33 1992 2325 2333
6. H. Sheng, C.A. Bottjer, and M.A. Bullimore Ocular component measurement using the Zeiss IOLMaster Optom Vis Sci 81 2004 27 34
7. D.S. Siganos, C. Popescu, N. Bessis, and G. Papastergiou Autorefractometry after laser in situ keratomileusis J Cataract Refract Surg 29 2003 133 137
8. D.J. Salchow, M.E. Zirm, C. Stieldorf, and A. Parisi Comparison of objective and subjective refraction before and after laser in situ keratomileusis J Cataract Refract Surg 25 1999 827 835
9. N. Rosa, A. Iura, and M. Romano Correlation between automated and subjective refraction before and after photorefractive keratectomy J Refract Surg 18 2002 449 453
10. K.D. Øyo-Szerenyi, L. Wienecke, U. Businger, and I. Schipper Autorefraction/autokeratometry and subjective refraction in untreated and photorefractive keratectomy-treated eyes Arch Ophthalmol 115 1997 157 164
11. G.E. Russell, J.P.G. Bergmanson, R. Barbeito, and W.D. Cross Differences between objective and subjective refractions after radial keratotomy Refract Corneal Surg 8 1992 290 295
12. L.N. Thibos, W. Wheeler, and D. Horner Power vectors: an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error Optom Vis Sci 74 1997 367 375
13. L.N. Thibos, and D. Horner Power vector analysis of the optical outcome of refractive surgery J Cataract Refract Surg 27 2001 80 85
14. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 1986 307 310
15. W.J. Benjamin, and I.M. Borish Borish's Clinical Refraction 1998 Saunders Philadelphia, PA 559-628
16. L.N. Davies, E.A.H. Mallen, J.S. Wolffsohn, and B. Gilmartin Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K autorefractor Optom Vis Sci 80 2003 320 324
17. R.A. Applegate, G. Hilmantel, and H.C. Howland Corneal first surface optical aberrations and visual performance J Refract Surg 16 2000 507 514
18. X. Hong, and L.N. Thibos Longitudinal evaluation of optical aberrations following laser in situ keratomileusis surgery J Refract Surg 16 2000 S647 S650