Effectiveness of stream restoration following highway reconstruction projects on two freshwater streams in Kentucky

Ecological Engineering

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 73-84

  Price, David J ^a   Birge, Wesley J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fish index of biotic integrity; Habitat assessment; Rapid bioassessment protocols; Stream remediation

Indexed keywords

FISHERIES; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OCEAN HABITATS; REMEDIATION; STREAM FLOW;

BANK STABILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION; HABITAT RESTORATION; STREAM RESTORATION;

PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

HABITAT RESTORATION; INDEX OF BIOTIC INTEGRITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; ROAD CONSTRUCTION;

CEDAR CREEK; HOLTS CREEK; KENTUCKY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 20544454123     PISSN: 09258574     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.03.002     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. P.L. Angermeier, and J.R. Karr Applying an index of biotic integrity based on stream-fish communities: considerations in sampling and interpretation N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 6 1986 418 429
2. APHA-American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association and Water Pollution Control Federation Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 19th ed. 1995 American Public Health Association Washington, DC
3. H.E. Berkman, C.F. Rabeni, and T.P. Boyle Biomonitors of stream quality in agricultural areas: fish versus invertebrates Environ. Manage. 10 3 1986 413 419
4. Boschung Jr., H.T., Williams, J.D., Gotshall, D.W., Caldwell, D.K., Caldwell, M.C., 1988. The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Fishes, Whales & Dolphins. A.A. Knopf Inc./Chanticleer Press Inc., New York, NY.
5. W.M. Clay A Field Manual of Kentucky Fishes 1962 Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Frankfort, KY
6. Dupont, B., Palle, S., 2003. Assessment and modeling of stream mitigation procedures. Research Report KTC-03-14/SPR193-98-1F. Kentucky Transportation Center, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
7. S. Eddy, and J.C. Underhill How to Know the Freshwater Fishes third ed. 1978 Wm. C. Brown Company Publishers/McGraw Hill Boston, MA
8. D.E. Fletcher, S.D. Wilkins, J.V. McArthur, and G.K. Meffe Influence of riparian alteration on canopy coverage and macrophyte abundance in Southeastern USA blackwater streams Ecol. Eng. 15 1999 S67 S78
9. D.B. Jester, A.A. Echelle, W.J. Matthews, J. Pigg, C.M. Scott, and K.D. Collins The fishes of Oklahoma, their gross habitats, and their tolerance of degradation in water quality and habitat Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 72 1992 7 19
10. J.R. Karr, K.D. Fausch, P.L. Angermeier, P.R. Yant, and I.J. Schlosser Assessing Biological Integrity in Running Waters, A Method and Its Rationale September 1986 Illinois Natural History Survey Champaign, IL (Special Publication 5)
11. T.G. Kovacs, P.H. Martel, and R.H. Voss Assessing the biological status of fish in a river receiving pulp and paper mill effluents Environ. Pollut. 118 2002 123 140
12. R.A. Kuehne, and R.W. Barbour The American Darters 1983 The University Press of Kentucky Lexington, KY
13. J. Lyons, L. Wang, and T.D. Simonson Development and validation of an Index of Biotic Integrity for coldwater streams in Wisconsin N. Am. J. Fish. Manage. 16 2 1996 241 256
14. Meade, B., Dupont, B., Palle, S., Hopwood II T., 1999. Assessment and Modeling of Stream Mitigation Procedures. Research Report KTC-99-52. Kentucky Transportation Center, College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
15. K. Moore, M. Furniss, S. Firor, and M. Love Fish Passage Through Culverts an Annotated Bibliography 1999 USDA Forest Service, Six Rivers National Forest Watershed Interactions Team Eureka, CA http://www.stream.fs.fed.us/fishxing/ biblio.html
16. K. Morita, and A. Yokota Population viability of stream-resident salmonids after habitat fragmentation: a case study with white-spotted charr (Salvelinus leucomaenis) by an individual based model Ecol. Model. 155 2002 85 94
17. Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Cabinet, 1997. Reference reach fish community report. Division of Water, Water Quality Branch, Ecological Support Section. Technical Report No. 52, September 24. Frankfort, KY, 248-256.
18. J.S. Nelson, E.J. Crossman, H. Espinosa-Perez, L.T. Findley, C.R. Gilbert, R.N. Lea, and J.D. Williams Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States, Canada, and Mexico 2004 American Fisheries Society Bethesda, MD (Special Publication 29)
19. L.M. Page, and B.M. Burr Peterson field guides Freshwater Fishes 1991 Houghton Mifflin Company Boston, MA
20. M.H. Paller, M.J.M. Reichert, J.M. Dean, and J.C. Seigle Use of fish community data to evaluate restoration success of a riparian stream Ecol. Eng. 15 2000 171 187
21. M.H. Paller Effectiveness of multiplate invertebrate samplers, periphytometers, and electrofishing for biomonitoring in streams Water Res. 30 9 1996 2095 2101
22. S. Siligato, and J. Bohmer Evaluation of biological integrity of a small urban stream system by investigation longitudinal variability of the fish assemblage Chemosphere 47 2002 777 788
23. A.K. Smith, P.A. Ajani, and D.E. Roberts Spatial and temporal variation in fish assemblages exposed to sewage and implications for management Mar. Environ. Res. 47 3 1999 241 260
24. U.S. EPA J.L. Plafkin M.T. Barbour K.D. Porter S.K. Gross R.M. Hughes Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Streams and Rivers: Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish 1989 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC EPA 440/4-89/001
25. U.S. EPA M.T. Barbour J. Gerritsen B.D. Snyder J.B. Stribling Rapid Bioassessment Protocols For Use in Wadeable Streams and Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic, Macroinvertebrates and Fish second ed. 1999 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC EPA 841-B-99-002