NAFTA and the changing pattern of state exports

Papers in Regional Science

Volumn 82, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 427-450

  Coughlin, Cletus C ^a   Wall, Howard J ^a  

^a FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

NAFTA; Regional integration; State exports

Indexed keywords

NAFTA; TRADE LIBERALIZATION;

CANADA; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES; WESTERN HEMISPHERE; WORLD;

EID: 20444505255     PISSN: 10568190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10110-003-0122-x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Baldwin RE, Magee CS (2000) Congressional trade votes: From NAFTA approval to fast-track defeat. Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC
2. Bayoumi T, Eichengreen B (1997) Is regionalism simply a diversion? Evidence from the evolution of the EC and EFTA. In: Ito T, Krueger AO (eds) Regionalism versus multilateral trade arrangements. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
3. Baier SL, Bergstrand JH (2001) The growth ofworld trade: Tariffs, transport costs and income similarity. Journal of International Economics 53: 1-27
4. Bergstrand JH (1985) The gravity equation in international trade: Some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. Review of Economics and Statistics 67: 474-481
5. Bergstrand JH (1989) The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition, and the factor-proportions theory of international trade. Review of Economics and Statistics 71: 143-153
6. Bolle MJ (2000) NAFTA: Estimated US job "gains" and "losses" by state over 5 1/2 years. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, February 2
7. Carlino GA, Voith R, Cody B (1994) The effects of exchange rate and relative productivity changes on US industrial output at the state level. Urban Studies 31: 219-232
8. Cheng I-H, Wall HJ (2001) Controlling for heterogeneity in gravity models of trade. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 99-010B
9. Coughlin CC, Cartwright PA (1987) An examination of state foreign exports and manufacturing employment. Economic Development Quarterly 1: 257-267
10. Coughlin CC, Fabel O (1988) State factor endowments and exports: An alternative to cross-industry studies. Review of Economics and Statistics 70: 696-701
11. Coughlin CC, Mandelbaum TB (1990) Accounting for changes in manufactured exports at the state level: 1976-1986. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 72: 3-14
12. Coughlin CC, Mandelbaum TB (1991) Measuring state exports: Is there a better way? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 73: 65-79
13. Coughlin CC, Pollard PS (2001) Comparing manufacturing export growth across states: What accounts for the differences? Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 83: 25-40
14. Cronovich R, Gazel RC (1998) Do exchange rates and foreign incomes matter for exports at the state level? Journal of Regional Science 38: 639-658
15. Cronovich R, Gazel RC (1999) How reliable are the MISER foreign trade data? Unpub. manuscript
16. Deardorff AV (1984) Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows. In: Jones RW, Kenen PB (eds) Handbook of international economics, vol. 1. North-Holland, New York
17. Deardorff AV (1998) Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
18. Eichengreen B, Irwin DA (1998) The role of history in bilateral trade flows. In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
19. Erickson RA (1989) Export performance and state industrial growth. Economic Geography 65: 280-292
20. Erickson RA, Hayward DJ (1991) The international flows of industrial exports from US regions. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 81: 371-390
21. Erickson RA, Hayward DJ (1992) Interstate differences in relative export performance: A test of factor endowments theory. Geographical Analysis 24: 223-239
22. Frankel JA (1998) Introduction. In: Frankel JA (ed) The regionalization of the world economy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
23. Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy: Cities, regions and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge
24. Gazel R, Schwer K (1998) Growth of international exports among the states: Can a modified shift-share analysis explain it? International Regional Science Review 21: 185-204
25. Gould D (1998) Has NAFT Achanged North American trade? Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Economic Review First Quarter: 12-23
26. Gunderson M (1998) Regional impacts of trade and investment on labour. Canadian Journal of Regional Science 21: 197-225
27. Hayward DJ (1995) International trade and regional economies: The impacts of European integration on the United States. Westview Press, Boulder
28. Hayward DJ, Erickson RA (1995) The North American trade of US states: Acomparati ve analysis of industrial shipments, 1983-1991. International Regional Science Review 18: 1-31
29. Hinojosa-Ojeda R, Runsten D, De Paolis F, Kamel N (2000) The US employment impacts of North American integration after NAFTA: A partial equilibrium approach. Manuscript produced at the North American Integration and Development Center, UCLA
30. Kahane LH (1996) Congressional voting patterns on NAFTA: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 55: 395-409
31. Karemera D, Ojah K (1998) An industrial analysis of trade creation and diversion effects of NAFTA. Journal of Economic Integration 13: 400-425
32. Kim S (1995) Expansion of markets and the geographic distribution of economic activities: The trends in US regional manufacturing structure, 1860-1987. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110: 881-908
33. Krueger AO (1999) Trade creation and trade diversion under NAFTA. National Bureau of Research Working Paper 7429
34. Krueger AO (2000) NAFTA's effects: A preliminary assessment. The World Economy 23: 761-775
35. Krugman P (1998) What's new about the new economic geography? Oxford Review of Economic Policy 14: 7-17
36. Krugman P, Livas ER (1996) Trade policy and the Third World metropolis. Journal of Development Economics 49: 137-150
37. Linnemann H (1966) An econometric study of international trade flows. North-Holland, Amsterdam
38. Manrique GG (1987) Foreign export orientation and regional growth in the United States. Growth and Change 18: 1-12
39. Markusen AR, Nopenen H, Driessen K (1991) International trade, productivity and US regional job growth: A shift-share interpretation. International Regional Science Review 14: 15-39
40. Mátyás L (1997) Proper econometric specification of the gravity model. The World Economy 20: 363-368
41. Paluzie E (2001) Trade policy and regional inequalities. Papers in Regional Science 80: 67-85
42. Pöyhönen P (1963) A tentative model for the volume of trade between countries. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 90: 93-100
43. Romalis J (2001) NAFTA's impact on North American trade. Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago, Working Paper
44. Rothstein J, Scott RE (1997) NAFTA and the states: Job destruction is widespread. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC
45. Scott RE (1999) NAFTA's pain deepens: Job destruction accelerates in 1999 with losses in every state. Economic Policy Institute, Washington, DC
46. Tinbergen J (1962) Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. The Twentieth Century Fund, New York
47. US International Trade Commission (1997a) The impact of the North American Free Trade Agreement on the US economy and industries: A three year review. Investigation No. 332-381
48. US International Trade Commission (1997b) The dynamic effects of trade liberalization: An empirical analysis. Investigation No. 332-375
49. US Trade Representative (1997) Study on the operation and effect of the North American Free Trade Agreement. Report to Congress per section 512 of the NAFTA Implementation Act
50. Wall HJ (2000) NAFTA and the geography of North American trade. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2000-017B
51. Wei S-J, Wu Y (2001) Globalization and inequality: Evidence from within China. National Bureau of Research Working Paper 8611
52. Wylie PJ (1995) Partial equilibrium estimates of manufacturing trade creation and diversion due to NAFTA. North American Journal of Economics and Finance 6: 65-84