Exact functional context matching for Web services

ICSOC '04: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Service Oriented Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 143-152

  Elgedawy, Islam ^a   Tari, Zahir ^a   Winikoff, Michael ^a  

^a RMIT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Context Matching; Functional Matching; Service Discovery; Service Matching; Web Services

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; DATA REDUCTION; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; SEMANTICS; TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

CONTEXT MATCHING; FUNCTIONAL MATCHING; SERVICE DISCOVERY; SERVICE MATCHING; WEB SERVICES;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 20444498706     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1035167.1035189     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. A. Aremski and J. Wing. Specification matching of software components. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 6(4):333-369, 1997.
2. I. Elgedawy. A conceptual framework for web services semantic discovery. In Proceedings of On The Move (OTM) to meaningful internet systems, pages 1004-1016, Italy, 2003. Springer Verlag.
3. I. Elgedawy, Z. Tari, and M. Winikoff. Functional context matching for web services. Technical Report TR-04-3, RMIT University, Australia, 2004.
4. D. Fensel and C. Bussler. The web service modeling framework WSMF. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 1(2):113-137, 2002.
5. P. Ganesan, H. Garcia Molina, and J. Widom. Exploiting hierarchical domain structure to compute similarity. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 21(1):64-93, January 2003.
6. V. Haarslev and R. Möller. RACER system description. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning, pages 701-706, 2001.
7. I. Horrocks. Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In Anthony G. Cohn, Lenhart Schubert, and Stuart C. Shapiro, editors, KR'98: Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pages 636-645. Morgan Kaufmann, USA, 1998.
8. V. Kashayp and A. Sheth. Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: A context-based approach. The VLDB journal, 5:276-304, 1996.
9. C. Lee and S. Helal. Context attributes: An approach to enable context-awareness for service discovery. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE/IPSJ Symposium on Applications and the Intrnet, USA, January 2003.
10. L. Li and I. Horrocks. A software framework for matchmaking based on semantic web technology. In Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on World Wide Web, pages 331-339, 2003.
11. M. Paolucci, T. Kawamura, T. Payne, and K. Sycara. Semantic matching of web services capabilities. In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Italy, 2002.
12. J. Pearson and P. Jeavons. A survey of tractable constraint satisfaction problems. Technical Report CSD-TR-97-15, Oxford University, Computing Laboratory, citeseer.nj.nec.com/pearson97survey.html, 1997.
13. P. Resnick. Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pages 448-453, 1995.
14. J. Roddick, K. Hornsby, and D. Vries. A unifying semantic distance model for determining the similarity of attribute values. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Australasian Computer Science Conference, 16:111-118, 2003.
15. K. Sycara, J. Lu, M. Klusch, and S. Widoff. Matchmaking among heterogeneous agents on the internet. In Proceedings AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Agents in Cyberspace, 1999.