Big infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 192, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1948-1953

  Gillean, Julia R ^a   Coonrod, Dean V ^a   Russ, Robert ^a   Bay, R Curtis ^a   Goodwin, Thomas Murphy ^b   Parer, Julian ^b   Schwartz, Martin ^b   Caughey, Aaron ^b   Tomsen, Tina ^b  

^a Maricopa Integrated Health System   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Macrosomia; Mode of delivery; Neonatal intensive care; Neonatal outcome

Indexed keywords

APGAR SCORE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY HEIGHT; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS DISTRESS; FORCEPS DELIVERY; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTAL DELIVERY; LABOR COMPLICATION; LABOR INDUCTION; LENGTH OF STAY; MACROSOMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATERNAL DIABETES MELLITUS; NEWBORN; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; POPULATION RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 20444496164     PISSN: 00029378     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.032     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. K.D. Gregory O.A. Henry E. Ramicone L.S. Chan L.D. Platt Maternal and infant complications in high and normal weight infants by method of delivery Obstet Gynecol 92 1998 507 513
2. K. Wollschlaeger J. Nieder I. Koppe K. Hartlein A study of fetal macrosomia Arch Gynecol Obstet 263 1999 51 55
3. B.M. Casey M.J. Lucas D.D. McIntire K.J. Leveno Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes compared with the general obstetric population Obstet Gynecol 90 1997 869 873
4. P. Garner N. Okun E. Keely G. Wells S. Perkins J. Sylvain A randomized controlled trial of strict glycemic control and tertiary level obstetric care versus routine obstetric care in the management of gestational diabetes: a pilot study Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 1997 190 195
5. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fetal macrosomia 2000 The College Washington (DC) ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 22
6. G.R. Alexander M. Kotelchuck Quantifying the adequacy of prenatal care: a comparison of indices Public Health Rep 111 1996 408 418 discussion 419
7. N.E. Breslow N.E. Day The design and analysis of cohort studies. Statistical Methods in Cancer Research 1987 IARC Scientific Publications Lyon Vol II
8. V. Mulik T.S. Usha Kiran J. Bethal P.S. Bhal The outcome of macrosomic fetuses in a low risk primigravid population Int J Gynaecol Obstet 80 2003 15 22
9. S.L. Boulet G.R. Alexander H.M. Salihu M. Pass Macrosomic births in the United States: determinants, outcomes, and proposed grades of risk Am J Obstet Gynecol 188 2003 1372 1378
10. A.H. Nassar I.M. Usta A.M. Khalil Z.I. Melhem T.I. Nakad A.A. Abu Musa Fetal macrosomia (≥4500 g): perinatal outcome of 231 cases according to the mode of delivery J Perinatol 23 2003 136 141
11. T.J. Garite G.A. Dildy H. McNamara M.P. Nageotte F.H. Boehm E.H. Dellinger A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns Am J Obstet Gynecol 183 2000 1049 1058