Incremental generation by incremental parsing: Tactical generation in dynamic syntax

Proceedings of the 9th European Workshop on Natural Language Generation at the 10th Conference of the European Chapter, ENLG@EACL 2003

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 79-86

  Purver, Matthew ^a   Otsuka, Masayuki ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SYNTACTICS;

DYNAMIC SYNTAXES; INCREMENTAL PARSING; PARSING PROCESS; PROLOG IMPLEMENTATIONS; SELF-MONITORING; SIMPLE++; TACTICALS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 20444494026     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Patrick Blackburn and Wilfried Meyer-Viol. 1994. Linguistics, logic and finite trees. Bulletin of the /GPL, 2:3-31.
2. Holly Branigan, Martin Pickering, and Alexandra Cleland. 2000. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue. Cognition, 75:13-25.
3. Koenrad de Smedt and Gerard Kempen. 1990. Incremental sentence production, self-correction and coordination. In G. Kempen, editor, Natural Language Generation, pages 365-376. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht.
4. Gregor Erbach. 1991. A bottom-up algorithm for parsing and generation. CLAUS report, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, February.
5. Lyn Frazier. 1982. Shared components of production and perception. In M. Arbib et al., editor, Neural Models of Language Processes, chapter 11, pages 225-236. Academic Press, New York.
6. Claire Gardent and Stefan Thater. 2001. Generating with a grammar based on tree descriptions: a constraint-based approach. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the ACL. Association for Computational Linguistics.
7. Merrill Garrett. 1982. Remarks on the relation between language production and language comprehension systems. In M. Arbib et al., editor, Neural Models of Language Processes, chapter 10, pages 209-224. Academic Press, New York.
8. Albert S. Hornby. 1974. Oxford Advanced Learner's Dictionary of Current English. Oxford University Press, third edition. With the assistance of Anthony P. Cowie and J. Windsor Lewis.
9. Ruth Kempson, Wilfried Meyer-Viol, and Dov Gabbay. 2001. Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Blackwell.
10. Günter Neumann and Gertjan van Noord. 1994. Reversibility and self-monitoring in natural language generation. In T. Strzalkowski, editor, Reversible Grammars in Natural Language Processing. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Günter Neumann. 1994. A Uniform Computational Model for Natural Language Parsing and Generation. Ph.D. thesis, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.
12. Martin Pickering and Simon Garrod. 2003. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, forthcoming.
13. Aarne Ranta. 1994. Type-Theoretical Grammar. Oxford University Press.
14. Ehud Reiter and Robert Dale. 1997. Building applied natural language generation systems. In K. van Deemter and M. Stone, editors, Formal Issues in Natural Language Generation. CORSO C05.
15. Stuart Shieber, Gertjan van Noord, Robert Moore, and Fernando Pereira. 1990. A semantic head-driven generation algorithm for unification-based formalisms. Computational Linguistics, 16(1).
16. Stuart Shieber. 1988. A uniform architecture for parsing and generation. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 614-619. COLING.
17. Matthew Stone and Christine Doran. 1997. Sentence planning as description using tree-adjoining grammar. In P. Cohen and W. Wahlster, editors, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL, pages 198-205. Association for Computational Linguistics.
18. Patrick Sturt and Matthew Crocker. 1996. Monotonic syntactic processing: a cross-linguistic study of attachment and reanalysis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11:448-494.