What counts is what works? New labour and rail franchising

Public Money and Management

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 142-144

  Jupe, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444487632     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2005.00465.x     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Boyne, G., Kirkpatrick, I. and Kitchener, M. (2001), Introduction to the symposium on New Labour and the modernization of public management. Public Administration, 79, 1, pp. 1-4.
2. Cabinet Office (1999), Modernizing Government, Cm 4310 (The Stationery Office, London).
3. Department for Transport (2004), The Future of Rail, Cm 6233 (The Stationery Office, London).
4. Gilligan, A. (2004), Why our only nationalized railway is banned from talking to the Standard because it's too good. Evening Standard (6 December), p. 21.
5. Guardian (2004), Head of GNER calls for track and train integration (25 November), p. 21.
6. Jupe, R. (2005), The future of rail? An evaluation of the 2004 railway industry white paper. Public Money & Management, 25, 3, pp. 187-194.
7. Labour Party (1997), New Labour: Because Britain Deserves Better (London).
8. Lee, S. and Woodward, R. (2002), Implementing the third way: The delivery of public services under the B lair government. Public Money & Management, 22, 4, pp. 49-56.
9. Milner, M. (2005), Union fury over plans to reprivatize railway. Guardian (18 January), p. 15.
10. SRA (2002), Franchising Policy Statement (London).
11. SRA (2004), Annual Report 2003/04 (London).
12. SRA (2005), National Rail Trends 2004/05, Quarter Two (London).
13. Wolmar, C. (2003), Disconnection of Connex brings 'British Rail Mk 2'. Rail, 465 (9 July-22 July), pp. 28-29.