Generalization of mere exposure to faces viewed from different horizontal angles

Social Cognition

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 125-136

  Kramer, Robin S S ^a   Parkinson, Brian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444485822     PISSN: 0278016X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1521/soco.23.2.125.65625     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Bornstein, R.F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 265-289.
2. Cedrus (1999). SuperLab Experimental Lab Software (Version 2.01). San Pedro: Cedrus.
3. Corel (1997). Photo House Software (Version 1.1). Corel Corporation: Ottawa, Canada.
4. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 07-117.
5. Farah, M.J. (1991). Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 1-19.
6. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M.J. (1997). Becoming a "Greeble" expert: Exploring the face recognition mechanism. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682.
7. Gordon, P.C., & Holyoak, K.J. (1983). Implicit learning and generalization of the "mere exposure" effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 492-500.
8. Harrison, A.A. (1969). Exposure and popularity. Journal of Personality, 37, 359-377.
9. Harrison, A.A., & Fiscaro, S.A. (1974). Stimulus familiarity and alley illumination as determinants of approach response latencies of house crickets. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 39, 147-152.
10. Haxby, J.V., Ungerleider, L.G., Clark, V.P., Schouten, J.L., Hoffman, E.A., & Martin, A. (1999). The effect of face inversion on activity in human neural systems for face and object perception. Neuron, 22, 189-199.
11. Kunst-Wilson, W.R., & Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science, 207, 557-558.
12. O'Toole, A.J., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Memory and Cognition, 22, 208-224.
13. Rajecki, D.W. (1974). Effects of prenatal exposure to auditory or visual stimulation on postnatal distress vocalizations in chicks. Behavioral Biology, 11, 525-536.
14. Rhodes, G., Halberstadt, J., & Brajkovich, G. (2001). Generalization of mere exposure effects to averaged composite faces. Social Cognition, 19, 57-70.
15. Shepard, R.N. (1980). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317-1323.
16. Stang, D.J., & O'Connell, E.J. (1974). The computer as experimenter in social psychology research. Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation, 6, 223-231.
17. Walker, P. M., & Tanaka, J. W. (2003). A perceptual encoding advantage for own-versus other-race faces. Perception, 32, 1117-1125.
18. Yarmey, A. D., & Jones, H. P. T. (1983). Accuracy of memory of male and female eyewitnesses to a criminal assault and rape. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 21, 88-92.
19. Yin, R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 41-145.
20. Zajonc, R.B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1-27.