Comparative genomic hybridization analysis for pancreatic cancer specimens obtained by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration

Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 511-517

  Kitoh, Hideaki ^a   Ryozawa, Shomei ^a   Harada, Tomohiko ^a   Kondoh, Satoshi ^a   Furuya, Tomoko ^a   Kawauchi, Shigeto ^a   Oga, Atsunori ^a   Okita, Kiwamu ^a   Sasaki, Kohsuke ^a  

^a YAMAGUCHI UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Comparative genomic hybridization; DOP PCR; EUS FNA; Pancreatic cancer

Indexed keywords

ACINAR CELL CARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CHROMOSOME 11P; CHROMOSOME 11Q; CHROMOSOME 12P; CHROMOSOME 14Q; CHROMOSOME 17P; CHROMOSOME 17Q; CHROMOSOME 18Q; CHROMOSOME 19P; CHROMOSOME 1P; CHROMOSOME 1Q; CHROMOSOME 20Q; CHROMOSOME 2Q; CHROMOSOME 5P; CHROMOSOME 7P; CHROMOSOME 8P; CHROMOSOME 8Q; CHROMOSOME 9P; CHROMOSOME 9Q; CHROMOSOME LOSS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; DNA EXTRACTION; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC GAIN; GENOME ANALYSIS; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN TISSUE; JAPAN; MALE; MICRODISSECTION; PANCREAS CANCER; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TUMOR CELL;

ADENOCARCINOMA; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BASE SEQUENCE; BIOPSY, FINE-NEEDLE; COHORT STUDIES; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENOME; HUMANS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; NUCLEIC ACID HYBRIDIZATION; PANCREATECTOMY; PANCREATIC NEOPLASMS; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 20444479503     PISSN: 09441174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-005-1577-0     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Parker SL, Tong T, Bolden S, Wingo PA. Cancer statistics, 1997. CA Cancer J Clin 1997;47:5-27.
2. Gudjonsson B. Cancer of the pancreas. Fifty years of surgery. Cancer 1987;60:2284-303.
3. Sperti C, Pasquali C, Piccoli A, Pedrazzoli S. Recurrence after resection for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. World J Surg 1997;21:195-200.
4. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, Rutovitz D, Gray JW, Waldman FM, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 1992;258:818-21.
5. Kallioniemi OP, Kallioniemi A, Piper J, Isola J, Waldman FM, Gray JW, et al. Optimizing comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA sequence copy number changes in solid tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1994;10:231-43.
6. Harada T, Okita K, Shiraishi K, Kusano N, Furuya T, Oga A, et al. Detection of genetic alterations in pancreatic cancers by comparative genomic hybridization coupled with tissue microdissection and degenerate oligonucleotide primed polymerase chain reaction. Oncology 2002;62:251-8.
7. Solinas-Toldo S, Wallrapp C, Muller-Pillasch F, Bentz M, Gress T, Lichter P. Mapping of chromosomal imbalances in pancreatic carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res 1996;56:3803-7.
8. Fukushige S, Waldman FM, Kimura M, Abe T, Furukawa T, Sunamura M, et al. Frequent gain of copy number on the long arm of chromosome 20 in human pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997;19:161-9.
9. Mahlamaki EH, Hoglund M, Gorunova L, Karhu R, Dawiskiba S, Andren-Sandberg A, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization reveals frequent gains of 20q, 8q, 11q, 12p, and 17q and losses of 18q, 9p, and 15q in pancreatic cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997;20:383-91.
10. Schleger C, Arens N, Zentgraf H, Bleyl U, Verbeke C. Identification of frequent chromosomal aberrations in ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas by comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). J Pathol 2000;191:27-32.
11. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:1386-91.
12. Gines A, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Soria MT, Clain JE, Wiersema MJ. Usefulness of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUSFNA) in the diagnosis of functioning neuroendocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:291-6.
13. Fusaroli P, Caletti G. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy 2003;35:127-35.
14. Fritscher-Ravens A, Izbicki JR, Sriram PV, Krause C, Knoefel WT, Topalidis T, et al. Endosonography-guided, fine-needle aspiration cytology extending the indication for organ-preserving pancreatic surgery. Am J Gastroenterol 2000;95:2255-60.
15. Protiva P, Sahai AV, Agarwal B. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic neoplasms. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2001;30:33-45.
16. Hernandez LV, Mishra G, Forsmark C, Draganov PV, Petersen JM, Hochwald SN, et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis and treatment of cystic lesions of the pancreas. Pancreas 2002;25:222-8.
17. Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel T, Bobrowski C, Topalidis T, Thonke F, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatits. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:2768-75.
18. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. A cost analysis of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:2651-6.
19. Harewood GC, Wiersema LM, Halling AC, Keeney GL, Salamao DR, Wiersema MJ. Influence of EUS training and pathology interpretation on accuracy of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:669-73.
20. Fritscher-Ravens A, Sriram PV, Krause C, Atay Z, Jaeckle S, Thonke F, et al. Detection of pancreatic metastases by EUS-guided fine needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc 2001;53:65-70.
21. Harada T, Okita K, Shiraishi K, Kusano N, Kondoh S, Sasaki K. Interglandular cytogenetic heterogeneity detected by comparative genomic hybridization in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 2002; 62:835-9.
22. Harada T, Shiraishi K, Kusano N, Umayahara K, Kondoh S, Okita K, et al. Evaluation of the reliability of chromosomal imbalances detected by combined use of universal DNA amplification and comparative genomic hybridization. Jpn J Cancer Res 2000; 91:1119-25.
23. Kuukasjarvi T, Tanner M, Pennanen S, Karhu R, Visakorpi T, Isola J. Optimizing DOP-PCR for universal amplification of small DNA samples in comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997;18:94-101.
24. Suehiro Y, Umayahara K, Ogata H, Numa F, Yamashita Y, Oga A, et al. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization predict outcome in patients with endometrioid carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2000;29:75-82.
25. Shiraishi K, Kusano N, Okita S, Oga A, Okita K, Sasaki K. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in biliary tract cancers. Oncology 1999;57:42-9.
26. Suehiro Y, Sakamoto M, Umayahara K, Iwabuchi H, Sakamoto H, Tanaka N, et al. Genetic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization in ovarian clear cell adenocarcinomas. Oncology 2000;59:50-6.
27. Tada K, Oka M, Hayashi H, Tangoku A, Oga A, Sasaki K. Cytogenetic analysis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cell lines by comparative genomic hybridization: Relationship of cytogenetic aberrations to in vitro cell growth. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2000;117:108-12.
28. Nagel H, Schulten HJ, Gunawan B, Brinck U, Fuzesi L. The potential value of comparative genomic hybridization analysis in effusion- and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Mod Pathol 2002; 15:818-25.