Teaching Software Engineering in a Compiler Project Course

ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 3-

  Griswold, William G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Compiler course; Experimentation; Human Factors; software engineering

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444476648     PISSN: 15314278     EISSN: 15314278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/949257.949260     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Beck, K. 1999. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
2. Boehm, B. W. 1988. A spiral model of software development and enhancement. Computer 21, 5 (May), 61-72.
3. Brooks, F. P. 1975. The Mythical Man Month: Essays on Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
4. Dijkstra, E. W. 1968. The structure of the “THE”-multiprogramming system. Commun. ACM 11, 5 (May), 341-346.
5. Gibbs, W. W. 1994. Software's chronic crisis. Sci. Am. 271, 3 (Sept.), 72-81.
6. Jackson, M. A. 1975. Principles of Program Design. Academic Press.
7. Jackson, M. A. 1976. Constructive methods of program design. In Proceedings of the 1st Conference of European Cooperation in Informatics. Springer-Verlag, 236-262.
8. Johnson, S. C. 1978. A portable compiler: Theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. 97-104.
9. Leveson, N. G. and Turner, C. S. 1993. An investigation of the Therac-25 accidents. IEEE Computer 26, 7, 18-41.
10. Liu, H. 1993. Software engineering practice in an undergraduate compiler course. IEEE Trans. Edu. 36, 1 (Feb.), 104-107.
11. Parnas, D. L. and Weiss, D. M. 1985. Active design reviews: Principles and practices. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Software Engineering. 132-136.
12. Petroski, H. 1994. Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.