Inguinal hernia repair: Results using an open preperitoneal approach

Hernia

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 160-161

  Fenoglio, M E ^a   Bermas, H R ^a   Haun, W E ^a   Moore, J T ^a  

^a Surgical Consultants PC   (United States)

Author keywords

Costanalysis; Inguinal hernia; Kugel hernia repair; Preperitoneal repair; Recurrence

Indexed keywords

HYDROCODONE BITARTRATE PLUS PARACETAMOL; NARCOTIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY HOSPITAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVALESCENCE; EXPERIENCE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE COST; HERNIOPLASTY; HUMAN; INGUINAL HERNIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECURRENT DISEASE; SKILL; SURGEON; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HERNIA, INGUINAL; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECURRENCE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SURGICAL MESH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 20444470123     PISSN: 12654906     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-004-0313-7     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Grant AM (2002) Open mesh versus non-mesh repair of groin hernia meta-analysis of randomized trials leased on individual patient data. Hernia 6:130-136 10.1007/s10029-002-0073-1
2. Juul R, Christensen K (1999) Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair. Brit J Surg 86:316-319 10.1046/ j.1365-2168.1999.01053.x
3. Papachristou EA, Mitselou MF, Finokaliotis ND (2002) Surgical outcome and hospital cost analysis of laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair. Hernia 6:68-72 10.1007/s10029-002-0062-4
4. Johansson B, Hallerback B, Glise H, Anesten B, Smedberg S, Roman J (1999) Laparoscopic mesh versus open preperitoneal mesh versus conventional technique for inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 230(2):225-231 10.1097/00000658-199908000-00013
5. Chung RS, Rowland DY (1999) Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional inguinal hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 13:689-694 1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzhs1equg%3D%3D
6. Savarise MT, Simpson JP, Moore JM, Leis VM (2001) Improved functional outcome and more rapid return to normal activity following laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 15:574-578 10.1007/s004640080039
7. Medical Research Council Laparoscopic Groin Hernia Trial Group (2001) Cost-utility analysis of open versus laparoscopic groin hernia repair: results from a multicentre randomized clinical trial. Brit J Surg 88:653-661 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2001.01768.x
8. Kugel R (1999) Minimally invasive, nonlaparoscopic, preperitoneal, and sutureless, inguinal herniorrhaphy. Am J Surg 178:298-302
9. Amid PK (2004) Exploiting vs avoiding the preperitoneal space in inguinal hernia repair. Arch Surg 139:130 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.130
10. Schroder DM, Lloyd LR, Boccaccio JE, Wesen CA (2004) Inguinal hernia recurrence following preperitoneal Kugel patch repair. Am Surgeon 70(2):132-6