For-to complement clauses in english: A cognitive grammar analysis

Studia Linguistica

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 171-192

  Hamawand, Zeki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444463942     PISSN: 00393193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0039-3193.2003.00103.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. BRESNAN, J. B. 1970. On complementisers: Toward a syntactic theory of complement Types. Foundations of Language 6: 297-321.
2. BRESNAN, J. B. 1972. A theory of complementation in English syntax. MIT. Diss.
3. ERDMANN, P. 1997. The for... to construction in English. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
4. GIVÓN, T. 1990. Syntax: A functional-typological introduction. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. GIVÓN, T. 1993. English grammar: A function-based introduction, Vol. 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. HAIMAN, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language 59: 781-819.
7. HAMAWAND, Z. 2002. Atemporal complement clauses in English: A Cognitive Grammar analysis. München: Lincom Europa.
8. JESPERSEN, O. 1970. A modern English grammar on historical principles. Part V. London: George Allen & Unwin.
9. JØRGENSEN, E. 1975. Notes on the group for+(pro)nouns+to- infinitive. English Studies 56: 129-139.
10. KIRKPATRICK, B. (ed.) 1998. Roget's Thesaurus of English words and phrases. London: Penguin.
11. KIRKPATRICK, C. 1983. What do for-to complements mean? Chicago Linguistic Society 19: 214-223.
12. KIPARSKY, P. & KIPARSKY, C. 1970. Fact. Progress in Linguistics, eds. M. Bierwisch & K. E. Heidolph, 143-173. The Hague: Mouton.
13. LANGACKER, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. LANGACKER, R. W. 1991a. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. LANGACKER, R. W. 1991b. Concept, image and symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
16. LANGACKER, R. W. 1997. Consistency, dependency and conceptual grouping. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 1-32.
17. LANGACKER, R. W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualisation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
18. LEECH, G. N. 1971. Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.
19. LINDSTROMBERG, S. 1998. English prepositions explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. MAIR, C. 1987. For/to-infinitival clauses in contemporary British English. English Studies 68: 545-559.
21. MAIR, C. 1990. Infinitival complement clauses in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. ROSENBAUM, P. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. RUDANKO, J. 1988. On the grammar of for clauses in English. English Studies 69: 433-452.
24. SPEARS, A. K. 1973. Complements of significant-class predicates: A study in the semantics of complementation. Chicago Linguistic Society 9: 627-638.
25. STOCKWELL, R. et al. 1973. The major syntactic structures of English. New York: Holt.
26. URDANG, L. 1991. The Oxford Thesaurus: An A-Z dictionary of synonyms. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
27. WIERZBICKA, A. 1988. The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.