Editorial: Theorizing normal drug use

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 201-203

  Hammersley, Richard ^a  

^a GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

3,4 METHYLENEDIOXYMETHAMPHETAMINE; ALCOHOL; AMPHETAMINE; CANNABIS; COCAINE; DIAMORPHINE; NICOTINE; OPIATE;

COMPREHENSION; CONSUMER; DRUG DEPENDENCE; DRUG EFFECT; DRUG USE; EDITORIAL; EUPHORIA; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NAUSEA; PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 20444462367     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16066350500053471     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Behavioural Pharmacology (2002). 13, 5. Issue on new advances in the understanding and treatment of addiction.
2. Dalgarno, P., & Shewan, D. (2005). Reducing the risks of drug use: The case for set and setting. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(3), 259-265.
3. Drugs Strategy Directorate (2002). Updated drugs strategy, 2002. London: Home Office.
4. Hammersley, R., Jenkins, R., & Reid, M. (2001). Cannabis use and social identity. Addiction Research and Theory, 9, 133-150.
5. Jones, B. T., Corbin, W., & Fromme, K. (2001). A review of expectancy theory and alcohol consumption. Addiction, 96, 55-70.
6. Levy, J. A., & Anderson, T. (2005). The drug career of the older injector. Addiction Research and Theory, 13(3), 245-258.
7. Zinberg, N. (1984). Drug, set, and setting. Yale: New Haven.