Detection of diabetic retinopathy: A comparison between red-free digital images and colour transparencies

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology

Volumn 243, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 427-432

  von Wendt, Gunvor ^a   Summanen, Paula ^c   Hallnäs, Kerstin ^b   Algvere, Peep ^a   Heikkilä, Kauko ^d   Seregard, Stefan ^a  

^a ST ERIK S EYE HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b Ornskoldsviks Hospital   (Sweden)

^c HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MCNEMAR TEST; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SWEDEN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 20444459937     PISSN: 0721832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-004-1068-7     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. A Agresti 1990 Measuring agreement In: A Agresti (ed) Categorical data analysis Wiley New York 365-370
2. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1991) Fundus photographic risk factors for progression of diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 12. Ophthalmology 98(5) [Suppl]:823-833
3. Fransen SR, Leonard-Martin TC, Feuer WJ, Hildebrand PL, The Inoveon Health Research Group (2002) Clinical evaluation of patients with diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 109:595-601 10.1016/ S0161-6420(01)00990-3
4. George LD, Halliwell M, Hill R, Aldington SJ, Lusty J, Dunstan F, Owens DR (1998) A comparison of digital retinal images and 35 mm colour transparencies in detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 15:250-253 10.1002/ (SICI)1096-9136(199803)15:3<250::AID-DIA565>3.3.CO;2-7
5. Hellstedt T, Vesti E, Immonen I (1996) Identification of individual microaneurysms: A comparison between fluorescein angiograms and red-free and colour photographs. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234:13-17
6. Henricsson M, Karlsson C, Ekholm L, Kaikkonen P, Sellman A, Steffert E, Tyrberg M (2000) Colour slides or digital photography in diabetes screening - a comparison. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 78:164-168 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078002164.x
7. Klein R, Klein BEK (2002) Screening for diabetic retinopathy, revisited. Am J Ophthalmol 135:261-263 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01593-3
8. Landis JR, Koch GC (1977) The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174 1:STN:280:CSiC3srhvFI%3D
9. Liebetrau AM (1983) Measurements of association. In: Sage university paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, series no. 07- 032, 1st edn. Sage, Beverly Hills
10. Liesenfeld B, Kohner E, Piehlmeier W, Kluthe S, Aldington S, Porta M, Bek T, Obermeier M, Mayer H, Mann G, Holle R, Hepp K-D (2000) A telemedical approach to the screening of diabetic retinopathy: Digital fundus photography. Diabetes Care 23:345-348 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvntFyitQ%3D%3D
11. Lin DY, Blumenkranz MS, Brothers RJ, Brothers RJ, Grosvenor DM (2002) The sensitivity and specificity of single-field nonmydriatic monochromatic digital fundus photography with remote image interpretation for diabetic retinopathy screening: A comparison with ophthalmoscopy and standardized mydriatic colour photography. Am J Ophthalmol 134:204-213 10.1016/S0002-9394(02)01522-2
12. Olson JA, Strachan FM, Hipwell JH, Goatman KA, McHardy KC, Forrester JV, Sharp PF (2003) A comparative evaluation of digital imaging, retinal photography and optometrist examination in screening for diabetic retinopathy. Diabet Med 20:528-534 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3ps1Wqtw%3D%3D
13. Tennant MTS, Greve MDJ, Rudnisky CJ, Hillson TR, Hinz BJ (2001) Identification of diabetic retinopathy by stereoscopic digital imaging via teleophthalmology: A comparison to slide film. Can J Ophthalmol 36:187-196 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mznt1amsw%3D%3D
14. von Wendt GC, Heikkilä K, Summanen PA (1999) Assessment of diabetic retinopathy using two-field 60° fundus photography. A comparison between red-free, black-and-white prints and colour transparencies. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:638-648 10.1034/j.1600-0420.1999.770607.x
15. von Wendt GC, Rönnholm P, Heikkilä K, Summanen PA (2000) A comparison between one- and two-field fundus photography when screening for diabetic retinopathy. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 77:14-20 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078001014.x
16. von Wendt GC, Heikkilä K, Summanen PA (2002) Detection of retinal neovascularizations using 45° and 60° photographic fields with varying 45° fields simulated on a 60° photograph. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 80:372-378 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2002.800405.x