What do planners need to know? Identifying needed competencies, methods, and skills

Journal of Architectural and Planning Research

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 91-106

  Alexander, Ernest R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING METHOD; PLANNING PRACTICE;

EID: 20444458626     PISSN: 07380895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ACSP (2001) ACSP symposium on the state of the planning academy: Art, science and education (Special issue). Journal of Planning Education and Research 20(4):397-447.
2. Alexander ER (1987) Planning as development control: Is that all urban planning is for? Town Planning Review 58(4):453-467.
3. Alexander ER (1988) Informal settlement in Latin America and its policy implications. In CV Patton (Ed.), Spontaneous shelter: International perspectives and prospects. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, pp. 125-146.
4. Alexander ER (1989) Is planning a word or a concept: A response to Lincoln Allison's "Reply." Town Planning Review 60(4):459-460.
5. Alexander ER (1992) Approaches to planning: Introducing planning theories, concepts and issues, 2nd edition. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach.
6. Alexander ER (1994) Commentary: The non-Euclidean mode of planning: What is it to be? Journal of the American Planning Association 60(3):372-376.
7. Alexander ER (1998) Doing the impossible: Notes for a general theory of planning. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25(5):667-680.
8. Alexander ER (2000) Forbidden fruit: Knowledge in planning. Paper presented at XI Association of European Schools of Planning Congress, Brno, Czech Republic (July 18-23).
9. Alexander ER (2001) Comment: What do planners need to know? Journal of Planning Education and Research 20(2):377-381.
10. Alexander ER (2002) Metropolitan regional planning in Amsterdam: A case study. Town Planning Review 73(1):17-40.
11. Allison L (1986) What is planning for? Town Planning Review 51(1):5-16.
12. Allison L (1988) Is planning a word or a concept? A reply to ER Alexander. Town Planning Review 59(1):105-109.
13. Allmendinger P, Tedwr-Jones M (1997) Mind the gap: Planning theory-practice and the translation of knowledge into action - A comment on Alexander (1997). Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24(6):802-806.
14. Beatley T (1994) Ethical land use: Principles of policy and planning. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.
15. Beauregard RA (1998) Writing the planner. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18(2):93-101.
16. Contant CK, Forkenbrook DJ (1986) Planning methods: What can and what should we teach? Journal of Planning Education and Research 6(1):10-21.
17. Crosta PL (1996) Connecting knowledge with action in the interactive process of planning: What knowledge is relevant and with whose actions should we be concerned? Planning Theory 16:104-122.
18. Davidoff P, Reiner TA (1962) A choice theory of planning. Journal of the American Institute of Planners 28(3):103-115.
19. Faludi A (1987) A decision-centered view of environmental planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
20. Faludi A, van de Valk A (1994) Rule and order: Dutch planning doctrine in the twentieth century. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21. Flyvbjerg B (2001) Making social science matter. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Friedmann J (1973) Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
23. Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: From knowledge to action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24. Friedmann J (1993) Toward a non-Euclidean mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 59(4):482-485.
25. Friedmann J (1994) Counterpoint: The utility of non-Euclidean planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 60(3):377-379.
26. Gerckens LC (1988) Historical development of American city planning. In F So and J Getzels (Eds.), The practice of local government planning. Washington, D.C.: ICMA, pp. 20-59.
27. Harris B (1996) Planning technologies and planning theories. In SJ Mandelbaum, L Mazza, and RW Burchell (Eds.), Explorations in planning theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers State University, pp. 483-496.
28. Healey P (1996) The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 23(2):217-234.
29. Hillier J (1995) The unwritten law of planning theory: Common sense. Journal of Planning Education and Research 14(4):292-296.
30. Kaufman S, Simons R (1995) Quantitative and research methods in planning: Are schools teaching what practitioners practice? Journal of Planning Education and Research 15(1):17-34.
31. Laumann EO, Knoke D (1987) The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
32. Mazza L (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Planning Theory 1(1):11-26.
33. McDonald GT (1996) Planning as sustainable development. Journal of Planning Education and Research 15(3):225-236.
34. Ozawa CP, Selzer EP (1999) Taking our bearings: Mapping a relationship between planning practice, theory, and education. Journal of Planning Education and Research 18(3):257-266.
35. Vickers G (1968) Value systems and social process. New York: Basic Books.
36. Voogd H, Woltjer J (1999) The communicative ideology in spatial planning: Some critical reflections based on the Dutch experience. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26(6):835-854.
37. Wildavsky AB (1973) If planning is everything, maybe it's nothing. Policy Sciences 4(2):127-153.