메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 127, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 3-12

Why size class methodology matters in analyses of net and gross job flows

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 20444456680     PISSN: 00981818     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (17)

References (7)
  • 1
    • 20444453947 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • One other issue that has been raised in the gross job flows literature is the definition of a small business. This article presents its statistics using BLS standard size class categories. Users can then aggregate categories in the manner they wish to for various definitions of the term small business.
  • 2
    • 0003678642 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1996, especially chapter 4
    • For more information on regression-to-the-mean bias, see Steven J. Davis, John C. Haltiwanger, and Scott Schuh, Job Creation and Destruction (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1996), especially chapter 4;
    • Job Creation and Destruction
    • Davis, S.J.1    Haltiwanger, J.C.2    Schuh, S.3
  • 3
    • 0001110217 scopus 로고
    • Do old fallacies ever die?
    • December
    • and Milton Friedman, "Do Old Fallacies Ever Die?" Journal of Economic Literature, December 1992, pp. 2129-32.
    • (1992) Journal of Economic Literature , pp. 2129-2132
    • Friedman, M.1
  • 4
    • 14044252767 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Business employment dynamics
    • April. The Business Employment Dynamics program website is
    • For more information about the Business Employment Dynamics program, see James R. Spletzer, R. Jason Faberman, Akbar Sadeghi, David M. Talan, and Richard L. Clayton, "Business Employment Dynamics," Monthly Labor Review, April 2004, pp. 29-42. The Business Employment Dynamics program website is www.bls.gov/bdm.
    • (2004) Monthly Labor Review , pp. 29-42
    • Spletzer, J.R.1    Faberman, R.J.2    Sadeghi, A.3    Talan, D.M.4    Clayton, R.L.5
  • 5
    • 20444452339 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • A technical point warrants mention. Establishment births in June 2000 are not in the database in March 2000, and establishment deaths are not in the database in June 2000. Thus, base-size employment is defined for openings as of June 2000, and end-size employment is defined for closings as of March 2000. To calculate the mean size of openings and closings, employment in the quarter in which the unit was not present was set to zero.
  • 6
    • 20444449141 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
    • This finding of monotonically declining (not seasonally adjusted) net employment growth rates does not hold for the other quarters in calendar-year 2000.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.