Dose-time-response modeling of longitudinal measurements for neurotoxicity risk assessment

Environmetrics

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 603-617

  Zhu, Yiliang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmark dose; Dose time response; Functional observational battery; Longitudinal data; Random effects; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY;

EID: 20444445590     PISSN: 11804009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/env.725     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anger WK. 1986. Workplace exposures. In Neurobehavioral Toxicology, Annau ZA (ed.). Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore; 331-347.
2. Breslow NE, Clayton DG. 1993. Approximate inference in generalized linear mixed models. Journal of American Statistical Association 88: 9-25.
3. Crump KS. 1984. A new method for determining allowable daily intakes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology 4: 854-871.
4. Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm (with Discussion). Journal of Royal Statistical Society Series B 39: 1-38.
5. Gaylor DW, Ryan L, Krewski D, Zhu Y. 1998. Procedures for calculating bench-mark doses for health risk assessment. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 28: 150-164.
6. Lindstrom M, Bates D. 1988. Newton-Raphson and EM algorithms for linear mixed-effects models for repeated-measures data. Journal of American Statistical Association 4: 1014-1022.
7. Lindstrom MJ, Bates DM. 1990. Nonlinear mixed effects models for repeated measures data. Biometrics 46: 673-687.
8. McDaniel KL, Moser VC. 1993. Utility of a neurobehavioral screening battery for differentiating the effects of two pyrethroids, permethrin and cypermethrin. Neurotoxicological Teratology 15: 71-83.
9. Moser VC, Cheek BM, MacPhail RC. 1995. A multidisciplinary approach to toxicological screening III: neurobehavioral toxicity. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health 45: 173-210.
10. Moser VC, Tilson HA, MacPhail RC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, Frantik E, Kulig B, Winneke G. 1997a. The IPCS collaborative study on neurobehavioral screening methods: II - protocol design and testing procedures. Neurotoxicology 18: 929-938.
11. Moser VC, Becking GC, Cuomo V, Frantik E, Kulig B, MacPhail RC, Tilson HA, Winneke G, Brightwell WS, DeSalvia MA, Gill MW, Haggerty GC, Hornychova M, Lammers J, Larsson J, McDaniel KL, Nelson BK, Ostergaard G. 1997b. The IPCS collaborative study on neurobehavioral screening methods: results of chemical testing. Neurotoxicology 18: 969-1056.
12. Myers LE, Sexton NH, Southerland LI, Wolff TJ. 1981. Regression analysis of Ames test data. Environmental Mutagenesis 3: 575-586.
13. Office of Technology Assessment (OTA). 1990. Neurotoxicity: Identifying and Controlling Poisons of the Nervous System. U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (OTA-BA-436). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
14. Pinheiro JC, Bates DM. 2000. Mixed-effects Models in S and S-plus. Springer-Verlag: New York.
15. Raubertas RF, Lee CIC, Nordheim EV. 1986. Hypothesis tests for normal means constrained by linear inequalities. Communication in Statistics-Theory and Methods 15: 2809-2833.
16. Raudenbush SW, Yang M, Yosef M. 2000. Maximum likelihood for generalized linear models with nested random effects via high-order, multivariate Laplace approximation. Journal of Computational and Graphic Statistics 9: 141-157.
17. Shargel L, Yu BC. 1993. Applied Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics. Appleton & Lange: Norwalk, Connecticut.
18. Sitter RR. 1992. Robust designs for binary data. Biometrics 48: 1145-1156.
19. Stram DO, Lee JW. 1994. Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects models. Biometrics 50: 1171-1177.
20. Stram DO, Lee JW. 1995. Correction to 'Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects models'. Biometrics 51: 1196.
21. Sutradhar BC. 2003. An overview on regression models for discrete longitudinal responses. Statistical Science 18: 377-393.
22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1998. Guidelines for neurotoxicity risk assessment. Federal Register 63: 26926-26954.
23. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. 2003. The use of score tests for inference on variance components. Biometrics 59: 254-261.
24. Vonesh EF, Wang H, Nie L, Majumdar D. 2002. Conditional second-order generalized estimating equations for generalized linear and nonlinear mixed-effects models. Journal of American Statistical Association 97: 271-283.
25. Watanabe I. 1980. Organotins (Triethyltin). In Experimental and Clinical Neurotoxicology, Spencer PS, Schaumburg HH (eds). Williams & Wilkins: Baltimore; 454-557.
26. West RW, Kodell RL. 1993. Statistical methods of risk assessment for continuous variables. Communications Statistics - Theory and Methods 22: 3363-3376.
27. Wolfinger R. 1993. Laplace's approximation for nonlinear mixed models. Biometrika 80: 791-795.
28. Woodruff SW. 2001. The use of mixed-effects dose-response models for neurotoxicity risk assessment. Master of Science in Public Health Thesis, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Florida.
29. Zhu Y. 2001. Neurobehavioral Toxicity Risk Assessment: Dose-Time-Response Modeling and Benchmark Dose Estimation. National Center for Environmental Assessment: US EPA.
30. Zhu Y. 2003. Technical Guidance Document for Dose-Response Modeling and Benchmark Dose Estimation of Neurobehavioral Toxicity Screening Data. National Center for Environmental Assessment: US EPA.