Evaluation of intervention strategies for idiopathic diarrhea in commercial turkey brooding houses

Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 345-348

  Higgins, S E ^a   Torres Rodriguez, A ^a   Vicente, J L ^a   Sartor, C D ^a   Pixley, C M ^a   Nava, G M ^a   Tellez, G ^a   Barton, J T ^a   Hargis, B M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Antibiotic; Brooding; Performance; Poult; Probiotic; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AVES; BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; SALMONELLA;

EID: 20444411933     PISSN: 10566171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/japr/14.2.345     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Histostat-50, Alpharma, Fort Lee, NJ.
2. Each bacterial isolate was grown individually in MRS broth and combined for administration in the drinking water. They were administered with 0.1% skim milk as a stabilizer.
3. Perform-Max, Wynco LLC, Lowell, AR.
4. Amprolium 128, administered at 0.012% in the drinking water, manufactured by Merial Limited, Duluth, GA, distributed by Phibro Animal Health, Fairfield, NJ.
5. Neo-Sol 50, 71.5 g of neomycin sulfate per 128 gal of drinking water, Alpharma, Fort Lee, NJ.
6. The importance of the use of a water acidifier in these trials is not known. Anecdotal evidence with a commercially available probiotic suggested that treatment of commercial water lines with an acidifier may increase the efficacy perhaps because the acidifiers reduce biofilm capture of the microorganisms or for other unknown reasons. At the time these experiments were initiated, we had limited unpublished data in commercial houses using automated water lines that this was indeed true. However, during the course of the present studies, we observed in our laboratory trials that pretreatment with a water acidifier in our individual drinkers did not affect the ability of these cultures to reduce Salmonella infection, possibly supporting the idea that biofilms within commercial water lines may interfere with delivery of selected microflora. As we were using individual pen waterers in this study, we elected to forego the water acidification in the third experiment. As we do not have a final conclusion on the value of water line acidification, we would prefer to not complicate the manuscript with these speculations.
7. R-Pen, 500 million units of Penicillin G Potassium per 128 gal of drinking water, Alpharma, Fort Lee, NJ.
8. 3-Nitro W, 28.3 g of roxarsone per 256 gal of drinking water, Alpharma, Fort Lee, NJ.
9. SAS Institute. 1991. SAS User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.