The relationship between client advocacy and audit experience: An exploratory analysis

Auditing

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 102-104

  Haynes, Christine M ^a   Jenkins, J Gregory ^b   Nutt, Stacey R ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Vestek Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditor objectivity; Client advocacy; Client preferences

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444401619     PISSN: 02780380     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abdolmohammadi, M., and A. Wright. 1987. An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgments. The Accounting Review 62 (January): 1-13.
2. Applebaum, M. I., and E. M. Cramer. 1974. Some problems in the non-orthogonal analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin 81: 335-343.
3. Bazerman, M. H., K. P. Morgan, and G. F. Loewenstein. 1997. The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Management Review 38 (Summer): 89-94.
4. Bhamornsiri, S., and R. E. Guinn. 1991. The road to partnership in the "Big 6" firms: Implications for accounting education. Issues in Accounting Education 6 (Spring): 9-24.
5. Braun, K. W. 1997. The disposition of audit-detected misstatements: An examination of aggregation effects. Working paper, University of Georgia.
6. Buchman, T. A., P. E. Tetlock, and R. O. Reed. 1996. Accountability and auditors' judgments about contingent events. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 23: 379-398.
7. DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (December): 183-199.
8. Einhorn, H. J., and R. M. Hogarth. 1981. Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgment and choice. Annual Review of Psychology 32: 53-88.
9. Farmer, T. A., L. E. Rittenberg, and G. M. Trompeter. 1987. An investigation of the impact of economic and organizational factors on auditor independence. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 7 (Fall): 1-14.
10. Gaa, J. C. 1997. The moral syndromes of the public accounting profession. Working paper, University of Alberta.
11. Gramling, A. A. 1997. External auditors' reliance on internal auditors: The influence of client and partner preferences on audit managers' reliance decisions. Working paper, University of Illinois.
12. Green, P. E. 1978. Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
13. Hackenbrack, K., and M. W. Nelson. 1996. Auditors' incentives and their application of financial accounting standards. The Accounting Review 71 (January): 43-59.
14. Jiambalvo, J., and N. Wilner. 1985. Auditor evaluation of contingent claims. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 5 (Fall): 1-11.
15. Johnson, L. M. 1993. An empirical investigation of the effects of advocacy on preparers' evaluations of judicial evidence. The Journal of the American Taxation Association 15: 1-22.
16. Johnson, V. E., and S. E. Kaplan. 1991. Experimental evidence on the effects of accountability on auditor judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 10 (Supplement): 96-107.
17. Lochner, P. 1993. Accountants' legal liability: A crisis that must be addressed. Accounting Horizons 7 (June): 92-96.
18. Marden, R. E., G. L. Holstrum, and S. L. Schneider. 1997. Control environment condition and the interaction between control risk, account type and management's assertions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 16 (Spring): 51-68.
19. Moizer, P. 1985. Independence. In Current Issues in Auditing, edited by D. Kent, M. Sherer, and S. Turley. London, U.K.: Harper and Row.
20. Nichols, D., and K. Price. 1976. The auditor-firm conflict: An analysis using concepts of exchange theory. The Accounting Review 51 (April): 335-346.
21. Pedhazur, E. J. 1982. Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction. Second edition. New York, NY: CBS College Publishing.
22. Roberts, M. L., and B. R. Cargile. 1994. Impartiality versus advocacy: CPAs' responses to conflict in auditing and tax situations. Working paper, University of Alabama.
23. Salterio, S. 1996. The effects of precedents and client position on auditors' financial accounting policy judgment. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21: 467-486.
24. _, and L. Koonce. 1997. The persuasiveness of audit evidence: The case of accounting policy decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22: 573-587.
25. Schuetze, W. P. 1994. A mountain or a molehill? Accounting Horizons 8 (March): 69-75.
26. Shah, A. K. 1996. Creative compliance in financial reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21: 23-39.
27. Smith, T. 1992. Accounting for Growth: Stripping the Camouflage from Company Accounts. London, U.K.: Century Business Publications.
28. Sporkin, S. S. 1993. The time has come: A call to the accounting profession to join the fight against financial fraud. In The Emanuel Saxe Distinguished Lectures in Accounting: 1993-94. New York, NY: CUNY-Baruch College.
29. Sutton, M. H. 1997. Auditor independence: The challenge of fact and appearance. Accounting Horizons 11 (March): 86-91.
30. Tan, H. T., and R. Libby. 1997. Tacit managerial versus technical knowledge as determinants of audit expertise in the field. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (Spring): 97-113.
31. Trompeter, G. 1994. The effect of partner compensation schemes and generally accepted accounting principles on audit partner judgment. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 13 (Fall): 56-68.
32. Wright, A., and S. Wright. 1997. An examination of factors affecting the decision to waive audit adjustments. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 12 (Winter): 15-36.