Distributed collaborative design teams: Media effects on design processes

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 145-165

  Hammond, Janeen M ^a   Harvey, Craig M ^b,e   Koubek, Richard J ^c   Compton, W Dale ^d   Darisipudi, Ashok ^b  

^a Wright State University   (United States)

^b Louisiana State University   (United States)

^c The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^d SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING   (United States)

^e LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DECISION MAKING; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; QUALITY ASSURANCE; SOCIAL ASPECTS;

COLLABORATIVE CORPORATIONS; COLLABORATIVE MANUFACTURING; CRITICAL DECISIONS; SOCIOTECHNICAL THEORY;

COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING;

EID: 20444398193     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1802_2     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Boutte, D., Jones, E., Hendricks, B., & Rodger, G. (1996, August). Group dynamics of video conferencing. Hydrocarbon Processing, 139-143.
2. Brown, D., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1989). Design problem solving: Knowledge structures and control strategies. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
3. Burleson, B. R., Levine, B. J., & Samter, W. (1984). Decision-making procedure and decision quality. Human Communication Research, 10, 557-574.
4. Carey, J. M., & Kacmar, C. J. (1997). The impact of communication mode and task complexity on small groups performance and member satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 13, 23-49.
5. Churchill, E. F., & Bly, S. (1999). It's all in the words: Supporting work activities with lightweight tools. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, 40-49.
6. Evans, N. J., & Jarvis, P. A. (1986). The group attitude scale. Small Group Behavior, 17, 213-216.
7. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., & Root, R. W. (1992). Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'96), 37-48.
8. Forsythe, C., & Ashby, M. R. (1996). Human factors in agile manufacturing. Ergonomics in Design, 4, 15-21.
9. Fussell, S. R., Kraut, R. E., & Siegel, J. (2000). Coordination of communication: Effects of shared visual context on collaborative work. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'00), 21-30.
10. Gallupe, R., DeSanctis, G., & Disckson, G. (1988, June). Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 277-295.
11. Gay, G., & Lentini, M. (1995). Use of the communication resources in a networked collaborative design environment. Retrieved September 15, 2003, from http://shum.cc.huji.ac.il/jcmc/jcmc.html
12. Goldman, S., & Preiss, K. (1992). 21st century manufacturing enterprise strategy: Vol. 2, Infrastructure. Bethlehem, PA: Lehigh University.
13. Gouran, D. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1986). Counteractive functions of communication in effective group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 81-90). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Greiner, R., & Metes, G. (1995). Going virtual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
15. Hacker, M., & Kleiner, B. (1996). Identifying critical factors impacting virtual work group performance. In IEEE International Engineering Management Conference 1996 (pp. 201-205). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
16. Hammond, J., Koubek, R. J., & Harvey, C. M. (2001). Distributed collaboration for engineering design: A review and reappraisal. International Journal of Human Factors in Manufacturing, 11, 35-52.
17. Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of a multi-dimensional workload rating scale: Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
18. Hartman, F., & Ashrafi, R. (1996). Virtual organizations: An opportunity for learning. In IEEE International Engineering Management Conference 1996 (pp. 196-200). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
19. Harvey, C. (1997). Toward a model of distributed engineering collaboration. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue University.
20. Hill, G. W. (1982). Groups versus individual performance: Are n + 1 heads better than one? Psychological Bulletin, 91, 517-539.
21. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1987). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
22. Hindus, D., Ackerman, M. S., Mainwaring, S., & Starr, B. (1996). Thunderwire: A field study of an audio-only media space. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'96), 238-247.
23. Jacob, V., Gaultney, L., & Salvendy, G. (1986). Strategies and biases in human decision-making and their implications for expert systems. Behaviour and Information Technology, 5, 119-140.
24. King, N., & Majchrzak, A. (1996). Concurrent engineering tools: Are the human issues being ignored? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 43, 189-201.
25. Kovac, F. J. (1993, June). Goodyear agility focuses on collaboration, technology and employee empowerment. Focus, 2.
26. Kraut, R. E., Miller, M. D., & Siegel, J. (1996). Collaboration in performance of physical tasks: Effects on outcomes and communication. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'96), 57-66.
27. Michaelsen, L. K., Watson, W. E., & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individuals versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 834-839.
28. NASA. (1999). Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Report (Phase I Report). Retrieved September 15, 2003, ftp://ftp.hq.nasa.gove/pub/pao/reports/1999/MCO_reports.pdf
29. Olson, G. M., & Olson, J. S. (2000). Distance matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, 139-178.
30. Olson, G. M., Olson, J. S., Carter, M. R., & Storrøsten, M. (1992). Small groups design meetings: An analysis of collaboration. Human-Computer Interaction, 7, 347-374.
31. Poole, M. S., & Doelger, J. A. (1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 35-61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Poole, M. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1986). Communication and group decision-making: A critical assessment. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 15-31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Sarkis, J., Presley, A., & Liles, D. (1995). The management of technology within an enterprise engineering framework. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 28, 497-511.
34. Sriram, D., Stephanopoulos, G., Logcher, R., Gossard, D., Groleau, N., Serrano, D., et al. (1989, Fall). Knowledge-based system applications in engineering design: Research at MIT. AI Magazine, 79-95.
35. Urban, J. M., Weaver, J. L., Bowers, C. A., & Rhodenizer, L. (1996). Effects of workload and structure on team processes and performance: Implications for complex team decision making. Human Factors, 38, 300-310.
36. Vora, P., & Helander, M. (1992). A review of design models and a proposal for a taxonomy of design. In M. Helander & M. Nagamachi (Eds.), Design for manufacturability: A systems approach to concurrent engineering and ergonomics (pp. 78-90). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.
37. Weeks, G. D., & Chapanis, A. (1976). Cooperative versus conflictive problem solving in three telecommunication modes. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42, 879-917.
38. Wickens, C. D. (1992). Engineering psychology and human performance. New York: Harper Collins.
39. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparison of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84, 963-976.
40. Zaccaro, S. J., & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
41. Zaccaro, S. J., & McCoy, M. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837-851.