A new method of visual exploration analysis;Nouvelle méthode d'analyse de l'exploration visuelle

Revue Neurologique

Volumn 161, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 513-517

  Muri R M ^a,b   Pflugshaupt, T ^a   Nyffeler, T ^a   Von Wartburg, R ^a   Wurtz, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Neurological rehabilitation; Saccades; Visual exploration; Visual field deficit

Indexed keywords

BRAIN INJURY; BRAIN TUMOR; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; EYE FIXATION; EYE TRACKING; FUNCTIONAL VISUAL FIELD; HUMAN; OCULOMOTOR SYSTEM; PERIMETRY; REHABILITATION; RETINA FOVEA; SACCADIC EYE MOVEMENT; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STROKE; VISUAL EXPLORATION ANALYSIS; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL FIELD DEFECT; VISUAL SYSTEM EXAMINATION;

EID: 20444385123     PISSN: 00353787     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0035-3787(05)85085-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (5)

1. ARDITI A. (1988). The volume visual field: a basis for functional perimetry. Clin Vision Sci, 3: 173-183.
2. BALL K, OWSLEY C, BEARD B. (1990). Clinical visual perimetry underestimates peripheral field problems in older adults. Clin Vision Sci, 5: 113-125.
3. BUSWELL GT. (1935). How people look at pictures. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
4. ESTERMAN B. (1980) Functional scoring of the binocular field. Ophthalmology, 89: 1226-1234.
5. IRWIN DE, ZELINSKY GJ. (2002). Eye movements and scene perception: memory for things observed. Percept Psychophys, 64: 882-895.