Reproduction, genetics and the law

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 692-704

  Crockin, Susan L ^a  

^a Law Office of Susan L Crockin   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic discrimination; Misuse of reproductive material; PGD; Reproductive genetics; Reproductive technology law; Wrongful conception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIRTH DEFECT; CLINICAL GENETICS; COURT; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC PROCEDURES; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LAW; LAW SUIT; LAWYER; LEGAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL LIABILITY; MEDICAL PROFESSION; PARENTAGE ANALYSIS; WORKPLACE;

EID: 20444379958     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61112-1     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1990 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq.
2. Ande vs Rock 2002 647 N.W.2d 265 (Wis. Ct. App. 2002).
3. Baker and Daniels 2002 Update on Genetic Testing Decision, Indiana.
4. Bragdon vs Abbott 1998 524 US 624.
5. Chambers vs Univ. Hosp. 2003 Civ. Act No. 00-N-1794-(CBS) (D.C. Colo. 2003). Appeal pending.
6. Civil Rights Act 2000 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et. seq.
7. Del Zio vs Columbia Presbyterian Med. Ctr. 1989. No. 74-3558 (SDNY 1978).
8. Doe vs Ill. Masonic Med. Ctr. 1998 696 N.E. 2d 707 (Ill.App.Ct.), app.denied 705 N.E. 2d 436 (Ill. 1998).
9. Doolan vs IVF America, Inc. 2000 12 Mass. L. Rep. 482 (Super. Ct. 2000).
10. EEOC vs Burlington N. Santa Fe Ry. 2002 Nos C01-4012, 4013 MWB (N.D.Iowa 2001); settlement filed (E.Dis.Wis. No. 02-C-0456 May, 2002).
11. EEOC, Compliance Manual 2000 Section 902, Definition of the Term Disability (update Feb. 1, 2000), available at http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/902cm.html.
12. Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act 2003 S. 1053, 108th Cong. (2003).
13. Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance and Employment Act', 2003 See e.g. H.R. 1910, 108th Cong. (2003) introduced by Rep. Louise Slaughter on 5/1/2003).
14. Gillett-Netting vs Comm'r of Soc. Sec. 2002, 371 F. 2d 592, 2004 U.S.App. LEXIS 11320 (AZ 2004).
15. Gladu vs Boston IVF 2004 32 Mass. Lawyers Weekly 1195 (2/9/04).
16. Greenberg vs Miami Children's Hosp. Research Inst. 2002 Inc., 208 F. Supp. 2d 918 (N.D. Ill. 2002).
17. Grimes vs Kennedy Krieger Inst., Inc. 2001 782 A.2d 807 (Md. 2001).
18. Harchiner vs. Univ. of Utah Med. Ctr. 1998 962 P.2d 67 (Utah 1998).
19. Hechler, David 2002 Railroad to pay US$2.2 million over genetic testing: Landmark settlement under the ADA, National Law Journal, 2002 May 13, 2002, at A22.
20. Houston Chronicle 2000 (5/31/02) No reported decision.
21. Johnson vs Superior Court 2002 124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 650 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002).
22. Jones H, Veeck L 2002 What is an embryo? Fertility and Sterility 77, 658-659.
23. Kerns vs Schmidt 1994 641 N.E. 2d 280 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994).
24. Lamaritata vs Lucas 2002 823 So. 2d 316 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002).
25. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. 2003a Tit. 24, § 2931(1) (2003).
26. Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. 2003b Tit. 24, § 2931 (2003).
27. Mich. Comp. Laws 2004 §600.2971 (2004).
28. Molloy vs Meier, 2004 679 N.W. 2d 711 (2004).
29. Moore vs. Regents of Univ. of Cal. 1990793 P. 2d 479 (Cal. 1990).
30. National Conference of State Legislatures, State Genetic Nondiscrimination in Health Insurance Laws at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/ndiscrim.htm. See also, http://www.genome.gov/11510231.
31. Norman-Bloodsaw vs Lawrence Berkeley Lab. 1998 135 F. 3d.1260 (9th Cir. 1998).
32. Paretta vs Med. Offices for Human Reprod. 2003 760 N.Y.S. 2d 639 (N. Y. Misc. 2003).
33. Pate vs Threlkel 1995 661 So. 2d 278 (Fla. 1995).
34. Perry-Rogers vs Fasano 2001 723 N.Y.S. 2d 181 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001).
35. Perry-Rogers vs Obasaju 2001 723 N.Y.S. 2d 28 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001).
36. Prato-Morrison vs Doe 2002 126 Cal. Rptr. 2d 509 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002).
37. Press Release, EEOC 2001 a EEOC Petitions Court to Ban Genetic Testing of Railroad Workers in First EEOC Case Challenging Genetic testing Under Americans with Disabilities Act (Feb 9, 2001) (available at http://www.eeoc.gov/press/2-9-01-c.html).
38. Press Release, EEOC 2001b EEOC Settles ADA Suit Against BNSF for Genetic Bias (April 18, 2001) (available athttp://www.eeoc.gov/press/4-18-01.html).
39. Press Release, EEOC 2002 EEOC and BNSF Settle Genetic Testing Case Under Americans with Disabilities Act (May 8, 2002), available at http://www.eeoc.gov/press/5-8-02.html.
40. Robert B. vs Susan B 2003 135 Cal. Rptr. 2d 785 (Cal. Ct. App. 2003), app. denied 2003 Cal LEXIS 6671 (Cal. 2003).
41. Safer vs Estate of Pack 677 A. 2d 1188 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1996).
42. Shin vs Kong. 2000 95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 304 (Cal. Ct. App. 2000).
43. Texas Family Code Ann. 2003 §160.702 (2003).
44. Grody WW et al. 2001 Laboratory standards and guidelines for population-based cystic fibrosis carrier screening. Genetics in Medicine 3, 149-154.
45. Welch A 2000 When scientists kidnap embryos. In: Insight on the News (7/31/2000); Cal. Penal Code §367g (2003).
46. Woodward vs Comm'r of Soc. Sec. 2002 760 N.E. 2d 257 (Mass. 2002).
47. York vs Jones, 717 F. Supp. 421 (E. D. Va. 1989).