Unobserved heterogeneity and estimation of average partial effects

Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 27-55

  Wooldridge, Jeffrey M ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 20444371759     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511614491.004     Document Type: Chapter

References (31)

1. Angrist, J. D. (1991), “InstrumentalVariables Estimation ofAverageTreatment Effects in Econometrics and Epidemiology,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Technical Working Paper 115.
2. Bartle, R. G. (1966), The Elements of Integration. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Blundell, R. and J. L. Powell (2003), “Endogeneity in Nonparametric and Semiparametric Regression Models,” in Advances in Economics and Econometrics: Theory and Applications, Eighth World Congress (ed. by M. Dewatripont, L. P. Hansen and S. J. Turnovsky), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Card, D. (2001), “Estimating the Return to Schooling: Progress on Some Persistent Econometric Problems,” Econometrica, 69, 1127–60.
5. Chamberlain, G. (1984), “Panel Data,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 2 (ed. by Z. Griliches and M. Intriligator), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1247–318.
6. Garen, J. (1984), “The Returns to Schooling: A Selectivity Bias Approach with a Continuous Choice Variable,” Econometrica, 52, 1199–218.
7. Gourieroux, C., A. Monfort, and A. Trognon (1984), “Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood Methods: Theory,” Econometrica, 52, 681–700.
8. Greene, W. H. (2000), Econometric Analysis, fourth edition. New York: Macmillan
9. Hahn, J. (1998), “On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametic Estimation of Average Treatment Effects,” Econometrica, 66, 315–31.
10. Heckman, J. J. (2001), “Micro Data, Heterogeneity, and the Evaluation of Public Policy: Nobel Lecture,” Journal of Political Economy, 109, 673–748.
11. Heckman, J. J., H. Ichimura, and P. Todd (1997), “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator,” Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261–94.
12. Heckman, J., and R. Robb (1985), “Alternative Methods for Evaluating the Impact of Interventions,” in Longitudinal Analysis of Labor Market Data (ed. by J. Heckman and B. Singer), New York: Wiley, 156–245.
13. Heckman, J. J., and E. Vytlacil (1998), “Instrumental Variables Methods for the Correlated Random Coefficient Model,” Journal of Human Resources, 33, 974–87.
14. Horowitz, J. L. (1992), “ASmoothed Maximum Score Estimator for the Binary Response Model,” Econometrica, 60, 505–31.
15. Lancaster, T. (1990), The Econometric Analysis of Transition Data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Manski, C. F. (1975), “Maximum Score Estimation of the Stochastic Utility Model of Choice,” Journal of Econometrics, 3, 205–8.
17. Manski, C. F. (1985), “Semiparametric Analysis of Discrete Response: Asymptotic Properties of the Maximum Score Estimator,” Journal of Econometrics, 27, 313–33.
18. Mundlak, Y. (1978), “On the Pooling of Time Series and Cross Section Data,” Econometrica, 46, 69–85.
19. Newey, W. K., and D. McFadden (1994), “Large Sample Estimation and Hypothesis Testing,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 4 (ed. by R. F. Engle and D. McFadden), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2111–45.
20. Papke, L. E., and J. M. Wooldridge (1996), “Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(k) Plan Participation Rates,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11, 619–32.
21. Rivers, D., and Q. H. Vuong (1988), “Limited Information Estimators and Exogeneity Tests for Simultaneous Probit Models,” Journal of Econometrics, 39, 347–66.
22. Robinson, P. M. (1988), “Root-N-Consistent Semiparametric Regression,” Econometrica, 56, 931–54.
23. Rosenbaum, P. R., and D. B. Rubin (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects,” Biometrika, 70, 41–55.
24. Smith, R., and R. Blundell (1986), “An Exogeneity Test for a Simultaneous Equation Tobit Model with an Application to Labor Supply,” Econometrica, 54, 679–85.
25. Van den Berg, G. J. (2001), “Duration Models: Specification, Identification, and Multiple Durations,” in Handbook of Econometrics, Vol. 5 (ed. by J. J. Heckman and E. Leamer), Amsterdam: North-Holland, 3381–460.
26. Wooldridge, J. M. (1997a), “On Two Stage Least Squares Estimation of the Average Treatment Effect in a Random Coefficient Model,” Economics Letters, 56, 129–133.
27. Wooldridge, J. M. (1997b), “Quasi-Likelihood Methods for Count Data,” in Handbook of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 2 (ed. by M. H. Pesaran and P. Schmidt), Oxford: Blackwell, 352–406.
28. Wooldridge, J. M. (2000), Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
29. Wooldridge, J. M. (2000b), “The Initial Conditions Problem for Dynamic, Nonlinear Panel Data Models with Unobserved heterogeneity,” Working Paper 00/496, Department of Economics, University of Bristol.
30. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press.
31. Yatchew, A., and Z. Griliches (1985), “Specification Error in Probit Models” Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 134–39.