Prediction of disease persistence after conization for microinvasive cervical carcinoma and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 311-316

  Lin, H ^a   Chang, H Y ^a   Huang, C C ^a   Changchien, Chan Chao ^a  

^a CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3; Conization; Microinvasive cervical carcinoma

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CANCER GRADING; CHINA; CURETTAGE; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYSTERECTOMY; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTMENOPAUSE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK FACTOR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CONIZATION; UTERINE CERVIX DYSPLASIA;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; CHINA; CONIZATION; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS; MENOPAUSE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 2042520120     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1048-891x.2004.14215.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Way S, Hennigan M, Wright VC. Some experience of preinvasive and microinvasive cancer of the cervical. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonwealth 1968;75:593-602.
2. Tabor A, Berget A. Cold knife and laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76:633-5.
3. Bigrigg A, Haffenden DK, Sheehan AL, Codling BW, Read MD. Efficacy and safety of large-loop excision of the transformation zone. Lancet 1994;343:32-4.
4. Mohamed-Noor K, Quinn MA, Tan J. Outcomes after cervical cold knife conization with complete and incomplete excision of abnormal epithelium: a review of 699 cases. Gynecol Oncol 1997;67:34-8.
5. Moore BC, Higgins RV, Laurent SL, Marroum MC, Bellitt P. Predictive factors from cold knife conization for residual cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in subsequent hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995;173:361-8.
6. Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Duggan BD, Roman LD. The significant of positive margins in loop electrosurgical cone biopsies. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:996-1000.
7. Lapaquette TK, Dihn TV, Hannigan EV, Doherty MG, Yandell RB, Buchanan VS. Management of patients with positive margins after cervical conization. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:440-2.
8. Husseinzadeh N, Shbaro I, Wesseler T. Predictive value of cone margins and post-cone endocervical curettage with residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 1989;33:198-200.
9. Jones HW, Buller RE. The treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by cone biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980;137:882-6.
10. Peterson-Brown S, Chappatte OA, Clark SK et al. The significance of cone biopsy resection margins. Gynecol Oncol 1992;46:182-5.
11. Phelps JY, Ward JA, Szigeti J, Bowland CH, Mayer AR. Cervical cone margins as a predictor for residual dysplasia in post-cone hysterectomy specimens. Obstet Gynecol 1994;841:128-30.
12. Kobak WH, Roman LD, Felix JC, Muderspach LI, Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP. The role of endocervical curettage at cervical conization for high-grade dysplasia. Obstet Gynecol 1995;85:197-201.
13. Vierhout M, De Planque P. Concomitant endocervical curettage and cervical conization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1991;70:359-61.
14. Anderson DJ, Strachan F, Parkin DE. Cone biopsy: has endocervical sampling a role? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:668-70.
15. Mitchell MF, Hittleman WN, Hong WK, Lotan R, Schottenfeld D. The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: an argument for intermediate endpoint biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1994;3:619-26.
16. Jansen FW, Trimbos JB, Hermans J, Fleuren GJ. Persistent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia after incomplete conization: predictive value of clinical and histological parameters. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994;37:270-4.