Assessment of medial olivocochlear system function in pre-term and full-term newborns using a rapid test of transient otoacoustic emissions

Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 183-190

  Morlet, T ^a,d   Hamburger, A ^b   Kuint, J ^b   Ari Even Roth, D ^b   Gartner M ^c   Muchnik, C ^b   Collet, L ^c   Hildesheimer, M ^b  

^a Kresge Hearing Research Laboratory of the South   (United States)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Maturation; MOCS; Newborn; Outer hair cells; TEOAEs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN STEM; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COCHLEA; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; ISRAEL; MALE; MATURITY; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PREMATURITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDIOMETRY, EVOKED RESPONSE; COCHLEA; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; FEMALE; HAIR CELLS, OUTER; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OLIVARY NUCLEUS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 2042476694     PISSN: 03077772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0307-7772.2004.00786.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. MORLET T., COLLET L., SALLE B. et al. (1993) Functional maturation of cochlear active mechanisms and of the medial olivocochlear system in humans. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 113, 271-277
2. MORLET T., GOFORTH L., HOOD L.J. et al. (1999) Development of human cochlear active mechanisms asymmetry: involvement of the medial olivocochlear system? Hear. Res. 134, 153-162
3. RYAN S. & PIRON J.P. (1994) Functional maturation of the medial efferent olivocochlear system in human neonates. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh.) 114, 485-489
4. GOFORTH L., HOOD L.J. & BERLIN C.I. (1997) Efferent suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in human infants. Abstr. Ass. Res. Otolaryngol. 166.
5. HAMBURGER A., ARI-EVEN ROTH D., MUCHNIK C. et al. (1998) Contralateral acoustic effect of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in neonates. Int. Tinnitus. J. 4, 53-57
6. ABDALA C., MA E. & SININGER Y.S. (1999) Maturation of medial efferent system function in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 2392-2402
7. WARR W.B., GUINAN J.J. & WHITE J.S. (1986) Organization of the efferent fibers: the lateral and medial olivocochlear systems. In Neurobiology of Hearing: the Cochlea, ALTSCHULER R.A., HOFFMAN D.W. & BOBBIN R.P. (eds), pp. 333-348. Raven Press, New York
8. SPANGLER K.M. & WARR W.B. (1991) The descending auditory system. In Neurobiology of Hearing: the Central Auditory System, ALTSCHULER R.A., BOBBIN R.P., CLOPTON B.M. & HOFFMAN D.W. (eds), pp. 27-45. Raven Press, New York
9. COLLET L., KEMP D.T., VEUILLET E. et al. (1990) Effect of contralateral auditory stimuli on active cochlear micro-mechanical properties in human subjects. Hear. Res. 43, 251-262
10. RYAN S., KEMP D.T. & HINCHCLIFFE R. (1991) The influence of contralateral auditory stimulation on otoacoustic emission responses in humans. Br. J. Audiol. 25, 391-397
11. VEUILLET E., COLLET L. & DUCLAUX R. (1991) Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65, 724-735
12. KHALFA S. & COLLET L. (1996) Functional asymmetry of medial olivocochlear system in humans. Towards a peripheral auditory lateralization. Neuroreport 7, 993-996
13. BERLIN C.I., HOOD L.J., WEN H. et al. (1993) Contralateral suppression of non-linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 71, 1-11
14. BERLIN C.I., HOOD L.J., HURLEY A.E. et al. (1995) Binaural noise suppresses linear click-evoked otoacoustic emissions more than ipsilateral or contralateral noise. Hear. Res. 87, 96-103
15. MICHEYL C., MORLET T., GIRAUD A.L. et al. (1995) Contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions and detection of a multi-tone complex in noise. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 115, 178-182
16. MICHEYL C. & COLLET L. (1996) Involvement of medial olivocochlear system in the detection of tones in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 1604-1610
17. GIRAUD A.L., GARNIER S., MICHEYL C. et al. (1997) Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility. Neuroreport 8, 1779-1783
18. RAJAN R. (1990) Electrical stimulation of the inferior colliculus at low rates protects the cochlea from auditory desensitization. Brain Res. 506, 192-204
19. PATUZZI R.B. & THOMPSON M.L. (1991) Cochlear efferent neurons and protection against acoustic trauma: protection of outer hair cell receptor current and interanimal variability. Hear. Res. 54, 45-58
20. ZHENG X.Y., HENDERSON D., Hu B.H. et al. (1997) The influence of the cochlear efferent system on chronic acoustic trauma. Hear. Res. 107, 147-159
21. MAISON S. & LIBERMAN M.C. (2000) Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J. Neurosci. 15, 701-707
22. KEMP D.T. (1978) Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64, 1386-1391
23. COLLET L., ROGE B., DESCOUENS D. et al. (1993) Objective auditory dysfunction in infantile autism. Lancet 342, 923-924
24. KHALFA S., BRUNEAU N., ROGE B. et al. (2001) Peripheral auditory asymmetry in infantile autism. Eur. J. Neurosci. 13, 628-632
25. BERLIN C.I., HOOD L.J., CECOLA R.P. et al. (1993) Does type I afferent neuron dysfunction reveal itself through lack of efferent suppression? Hear. Res. 65, 40-50
26. JOINT COMMITTEE ON INFANT HEARING (2000) Year 2000 Position Statement: principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs. Pediatrics. 106, 798-817.
27. VOHR B.R., WHITE K.R. & MAXON A.B. (1996) Effects of exam procedures on transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) in neonates. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 7, 77-82
28. MAXON A.B., WHITE K.R., BEHRENS T.R. et al. (1995) Referral rates and cost efficiency in a universal newborn hearing screening program using transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 6, 271-277
29. BERGMAN B.M., GORGA M.P., NEELY S.T. et al. (1995) Preliminary description of transient-evoked and distortionproduct otoacoustic emissions from graduates of an intensive care nursery. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 6, 150-162
30. WEN H., BERLIN C.I., HOOD L.J. et al. (1993) A program for the quantification and analysis of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions. Abstr. Ass. Res. Otolaryngol. 102.
31. KORRES S.G., BALATSOURAS D.G., ECONOMOU C. et al. (2000) Effect of the number of averaged responses in transient evoked otoacoustic emissions on the results of neonatal hearing screening. Audiology. 39, 293-299
32. CHAPCHAP M.J. & SEGRE C.M. (2001) Universal newborn hearing screening and transient evoked otoacoustic emission: new concepts in Brazil. Scand. Audiol. 53, 33-36
33. MAXON A.B., WHITE K.R. & VOHR B.R. (1997) Maintaining acceptably low referral rates in TEOAE - based newborn hearing screening programs. J. Commun. Disord. 30, 457-475
34. HOOD L.J., BERLIN C.I., HURLEY A. et al. (1996) Contralateral suppression of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions in humans: intensity effects. Hear. Res. 101, 113-118
35. ABDALA C. (2001) DPOAE suppression tuning: cochlear immaturity in premature neonates or auditory aging in normal-hearing adults? J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110, 3155-3162
36. LAVIGNE-REBILLARD M. & PUJOL R. (1988) Hair cell innervation in the fetal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.) 105, 98-402
37. SCHARF B., MAGNAN P. & CHAYS A. (1997) On the role of the olivocochlear bundle in hearing: 16 case studies. Hear. Res. 103, 101-122