Physical and mechanical properties of flakeboard produced from recycled CCA-treated wood

Forest Products Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 89-94

  Li, W ^a   Shupe, T F ^a   Hse, C Y ^b  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AGRICULTURAL CENTER   (United States)

^b USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROWN-ROT FUNGI; DECAY TESTS; DISPOSAL PROBLEMS; UTILITY POLES;

COPPER COMPOUNDS; DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LIFE CYCLE; RECYCLING; WOOD PRESERVATION;

WOOD PRODUCTS;

COPPER COMPOUNDS; DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTS; LIFE CYCLE; PARTICLE BOARDS; PINUS; RECYCLING; WOOD PRESERVATION;

FUNGI; PINUS ECHINATA;

EID: 2042473504     PISSN: 00157473     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. APA-The Engineered Wood Association (APA). 1997. Performance standards and policies for structural-use panels. APA test method P-l: linear expansion and thickness swell measured from oven dry to vacuum-pressure-soak. Standard PRP-108. APA. Washington, DC.
2. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 1998. Standard test methods for evaluating properties of wood-based fiber and particle panel materials. D 1037-93. In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards. Vol. 4.10. ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA. pp. 150-179.
3. American Wood-Preservers' Association (AWPA). 2000. Standard method of testing wood preservatives by laboratory soil-block culture. Standard E10-91. In: Book of Standards. AWPA, Woodstock, MD.
4. Boggio, K. and R. Gertjejansen. 1982. Influence of ACA and CCA waterborne preservatives on the properties of aspen waferboard. Forest Prod. J. 32(3):22-26
5. Clausen, C.A., S.N. Kartal, and J. Muehl, 2001. Particleboard made from remediated CCA-treated wood: Evaluation of panel properties. Forest Prod. J. 51(7/8):61-64.
6. Cooper, P.A. 1993a. Disposal of treated wood removed from service: The issues. In: Environmental Considerations in the Manufacture, Use, and Disposal of Preservative-Treated Wood. Proc. 7323. Forest Prod. Soc., Madison, WI. pp. 85-90.
7. _. 1993b. Leaching of CCA: is it a problem? In: Environmental Considerations in the Manufacture, Use, and Disposal of Preservative-Treated Wood. Proc. 7323. Forest Prod. Soc., Madison, WI. pp. 45-57.
8. _. 1996. Management of used poles removed from service. Second Southeast Pole Conference. Proc. 7287. Forest Prod. Lab., Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS. pp. 102-112.
9. _. 1999. Future of wood preservation in Canada - disposal issues. 20th Annual Canadian Wood Preservation Assoc. Conference, Vancouver, BC. CWPA, Toronto, ON, Canada.
10. _, T. Ung, J.P. Aucoin, and C. Timusk. 1996. The potential for reuse of preservative treated utility poles removed from service. Waste Management & Research 14:263-279.
11. Felton, C.C. and R.C. DeGroot. 1996. The recycling potential of preservative-treated wood. Forest Prod. J. 46(7/8):37-46.
12. Hall, H., R. Gertejansen, E. Schmidt, C. Carll, and R. DeGroot. 1982. Preservative treatment effects on mechanical and thickness swelling properties of aspen waferboard. Forest Prod. J.32(11/12):19-26.
13. Huang, C. and P.A. Cooper. 2000. Cement-bonded particleboards using CCA-treated wood removed from service. Forest Prod. J. 50(6):49-56.
14. Jeihooni, A., R.L. Krahmer, and J.J. Morrell. 1994. Properties and decay resistance of preservative-treated Douglas-fir flakeboard. Wood and Fiber Sci. 26(2): 178-184.
15. Lebow, S. and L. Gjovik. 2000. Properties and durability of CCA treated flakeboard. In: Proc. American Wood-Preservers' Assoc. 96th Annual Meeting. AWPA, Granbury, TX. 96:50.
16. Maloney, T.M. 1986. Modern Particleboard and Dry-Process Fiberboard Manufacturing. 2nd printing. Miller Freeman Publications, San Francisco, CA. 672 pp.
17. Micklewright, J. 1998. Wood preservation statistics 1997. American Wood-Preservers' Assoc., Granbury, TX.
18. Munson, J. and D.P. Kamdem. 1998. Reconstitute particleboard from CCA-treated red pine utility poles. Forest Prod. J. 48(3):55-62.
19. Prasad, T., P. Humphrey, and J. Morrell. 1994. The effects of chromated copper arsenate and ammoniacal copper zinc arsenate on shear strength development of phenolic resin to Sitka spruce bonds. Wood and Fiber Sci. 26(2):223-228.
20. Schmidt, E.L., D.W. French, R.O. Gertjejansen, J. Hermann, and H.J. Hall. 1978. Strength reductions in particleboard caused by fungi. Forest Prod. J. 28(2):26-31.
21. _, H.J. Hall, R.O. Gertjejansen, C.G. Carll, and R.C. DeGroot. 1983. Biodeterioration and strength reductions in preservative treated aspen waferboard. Forest Prod. J. 33(11/12):45-53.
22. Schmidt, R., R. Marsh, J. Balantinecz, and P. Cooper. 1994. Increased wood-cement compatibility of chromate-treated wood. Forest Prod. J. 44(7/8):44-46.
23. Smith, R.L. and R. Shiau. 1998. An industry evaluation of the reuse, recycling, and reduction of spent CCA wood products. Forest Prod. J. 48(2):44-48.
24. Vick, C.B. 1997. Enhanced adhesion of melamine-urea and melamine adhesives to CCA-treated southern pine lumber. Forest Prod. J. 47(7/8):83-87.
25. _ and A.W. Christiansen. 1993. Cure of phenol-formaldehyde adhesive in the presence of CCA-treated wood by differential scanning calorimetry. Wood and Fiber Sci. 25(1):77-86.
26. _ and T.A. Kuster. 1992. Mechanical interlocking of adhesive bonds to CCA-treated southern pine - a scanning electron microscopic study. Wood and Fiber Sci. 24(1): 36-46.
27. _, R.C. DeGroot, and J. Youngquist. 1990. Compatibility of nonacidic waterborne preservatives with phenol-formaldehyde adhesive. Forest Prod. J. 40(2):16-22.
28. _, R.L. Geimer, and J.E. Wood, Jr. 1996. Flakeboards from recycled CCA-treated southern pine lumber, Forest Prod. J. 46(11/12):89-91.