An analytical study towards the development of a standardized IM application

Computer Standards and Interfaces

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 343-355

  McClea, Michael ^a   Yen, David C ^a   Huang, Albert ^b  

^a MIAMI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Extensible messaging and presence protocol (XMPP); Instant messaging and presence protocol (IMPP); Session initiation protocol for instant messaging and presence leveraging extensions (SIMPLE)

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION CHANNELS (INFORMATION THEORY); ELECTRONIC MAIL; INTERNET; INTEROPERABILITY; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; STANDARDIZATION; STANDARDS;

EXTENSIBLE MESSAGING AND PRESENCE PROTOCOL (XMPP); INSTANT MESSAGING AND PRESENCE PROTOCOL (IMPP); SESSION INITIATION PROTOCOL FOR INSTANT MESSAGING; SESSION INITIATION PROTOCOLS (SIP);

TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES;

EID: 2042443080     PISSN: 09205489     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.csi.2003.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anonymous, "Definition: Instant Messaging", http://netconference.about.com/library/glossary/bldef-im.htm, Accessed March 1, 2003.
2. Anonymous, "Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol", http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/xmpp-charter.html, Accessed March 1, 2003.
3. Anonymous, "Jabber Technology Overview", http://www.jabber.org/ about/techover.html, Accessed on March 1, 2003.
4. Anonymous, "SIP for Instant Messaging and Presence Leveraging Extensions (SIMPLE)", http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/simple-charter. html, Accessed on March 1, 2003.
5. Anonymous, "What is Jabber", http://www.jabber.org/about/ overview.html?PHPSESSID=f5caa90d1531afbe8311e29259909268, Accessed March 1, 2003.
6. M. Day, S. Aggarwal, G. Mohr, J. Vincent, "Instant Messaging/Presence Protocol Requirements", RFC 2779, 2000, http://www.imppwg.org/, Accessed January 23, 2003.
7. Rivera K., Cooke N.J., Rowe A.L., Bauhs J.A. Conveying emotion in remote computer-mediated communication. CHI'94, (Conference Companion), April 24-28, Boston, Massachusetts. 1994;95-96.
8. Blakeley K. Instant headache. Forbes. 170(11):2002 (November 25);118.
9. Bradbury D. Pigeon post for the 21st century. Computer Weekly. 2001 (October 18);1-6.
10. Cushing K. Instant benefits. Computer Weekly. 2002 (July 18);1-3.
11. Dianda J.R., Gurbani V.K., Jones M.H. Session initiation protocol services architecture. Bell Labs Technical Journal. 7(1):2002;3-23.
12. Faulhaber G. Network effects and merger analysis: instant messaging and the AOL-Time Warner case. Telecommunications Policy. 26(6):2002;311-333.
13. Fong A.C.M., Lau C.T., Hui S.C. Towards an open protocol for secure online presence notification. Computer Standards and Interfaces. 23(4):2001;311-324.
14. Greenfield, D., "IM's Buddy Brawl", http://www.networkmagazine. com/article/NMG20021203S0010, December 3, 2002. pp. 17-18.
15. Greenfield D. Lesson 175: IM and IETF. Network Magazine. 2003 (February);17-18.
16. Hamblen M. Session initiation protocol. Computerworld. 37(5):2003 (February 3);29.
17. Kontzer T. Instant messaging gets down to business. IM Tools. 2003 (March 3);32.
18. Loshin P. Instant messaging made simple. Boardwatch Magazine. 15(9):2001 (July);72.
19. McFadden M. Failure to communicate. ENT. 1999 (September 8);1-3.
20. R. Marshall, "On Helicopters and Submarines", www.jabber.com/download.php?dl=Helicopters_Submarines.pdf, accessed on March 1, 2003, pp. 1-5.
21. J. Tyson, "How Instant Messaging Works", http://www. howstuffworks.com/instant-messaging.htm/printable, accessed January 21, 2003, pp. 1-7.
22. Woods B. FTC may look into AOL/Microsoft instant messaging war. Newsbytes. 1999 (July 28);1-3