Prostate biopsy - Practical examination of the adequacy of Chen's virtual strategy;Prostatabiopsie - Chens virtuelles schema in der praxis

Aktuelle Urologie

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 149-153

  Schostak, M ^a   Christoph, F ^a   Schrader, M ^a   Panick, M ^a   Lingnau, A ^a   Miller, K ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Detection rate; Prostate carcinoma; Sextant biopsy; Ten core biopsy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; ECHOGRAPHY; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; STANDARD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; URETHRA;

AGED; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENDOSONOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 20344404736     PISSN: 00017868     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-830219     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Lee F, Torp-Pedersen ST, Carroll JT et al. Use of transrectal ultrasound and prostate-specific antigen in diagnosis of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Urology 1989; 34: 4-8
2. Wolff JM, Borchers H, Jakse G. Determination of local tumour extension in cases of carcinoma of the prostate. Arch Esp Urol 1997; 50: 546-553
3. Hammerer P, Henke RP, Hubner D et al. Preoperative assessment of tumor aggressiveness in localized prostatic carcinoma. Urologe A 1995; 34: 413-418
4. Ogawa O, Shichiri Y, Ohnishi H et al. Usefulness of ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of localized prostate cancer. Hinyokika Kiyo 1996; 42: 805-810
5. Imai K, Ogura H, Ichinose Y et al. The significance of six sextant biopsy for prostate cancer. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1994; 85: 460-465
6. Eskew LA, Bare RL, McCullough DL. Systematic 5 region prostate biopsy is superior to sextant method for diagnosing carcinoma of the prostate. J Urol 1997; 157: 199-202
7. Fink KG, Hutarew G, Pytel A et al. One 10-core prostate biopsy is superior to two sets of sextant prostate biopsies. BJU Int 2003; 92: 385-388
8. Gore JL, Shariat SF, Miles BJ et al. Optimal combinations of systematic sextant and laterally directed biopsies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 2001; 165: 1554-1559
9. O'Connell MJ, Smith CS, Fitzpatrick PE et al. Transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate gland: value of 12 versus 6 cores. Abdom Imaging 2004; 29: 132-136
10. Parravicini M, Del Boca C. [Our experience about utility of the prostate mapping (8 + 8 biopsy) in the diagnosis of prostate tumour]. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2003; 75: 102-104
11. Makhlouf AA, Krupski TL, Kunkle D et al. The effect of sampling more cores on the predictive accuracy of pathological grade and tumour distribution in the prostate biopsy. BJU Int 2004; 93: 271-274
12. Loch T, Chen M. Computer simulation of Prostate Biopsies. European Urology 2002; 1: 47-51
13. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston DA et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis. J Urol 1997; 158: 2168-2175
14. McNeal JE. Cancer volume and site of origin of adenocarcinoma in the prostate: relationship to local and distant spread. Hum Pathol 1992; 23: 258-266
15. Schostak M, Christoph F, Muller M et al. Optimizing local anesthesia during 10-core biopsy of the prostate. Urology 2002; 60: 253-257
16. Babaian RJ, Toi A, Kamoi K et al. A comparative analysis of sextant and an extended 11-core multisite directed biopsy strategy. J Urol 2000; 163: 152-157
17. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston D et al. Prostate cancer detection: relationship to prostate size. Urology 1999; 53: 764-768
18. Norberg M, Egevad L, Holmberg L et al. The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer. Urology 1997; 50: 562-566
19. Reissigl A, Pointner J, Strasser H et al. Frequency and clinical significance of transition zone cancer in prostate cancer screening. Prostate 1997; 30: 130-135
20. Fujimoto H, Tobisu K, Niwakawa M et al. Significance of transrectal ultrasound and sextant systematic core biopsy for performing radical prostatectomy. Nippon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi 1997; 88: 479-487
21. Ravery V, Goldblatt L, Royer B et al. Extensive biopsy protocol improves the detection rate of prostate cancer. J Urol 2000; 164: 393-396
22. Presti Jr JC, Chang JJ, Bhargava V et al. The optimal systematic prostate biopsy scheme should include 8 rather than 6 biopsies: results of a prospective clinical trial. J Urol 2000; 163: 163-166
23. Naughton CK, Miller DC, Mager DE et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing 6 versus 12 prostate biopsy cores: impact on cancer detection. J Urol 2000; 164: 388-392
24. Chen ME, Johnston DA, Tang K et al. Detailed mapping of prostate carcinoma foci: biopsy strategy implications. Cancer 2000; 89: 1800-1809
25. McNeal JE, Bostwick DG, Kindrachuk RA et al. Patterns of progression in prostate cancer. Lancet 1986; 1: 60-63
26. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Tang K et al. Comparison of prostate biopsy schemes by computer simulation. Urology 1999; 53: 951-960
27. Eskicorapci SY, Baydar DE, Akbal C et al. An extended 10-core transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsy protocol improves the detection of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2004; 45: 444-449
28. Scattoni V, Zlotta AR, Nava L et al. Prostatic Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Guided Biopsy Schemes and TRUS Prostatic Lesion-guided Biopsies. Eur Urol 2002; 1: 28-34
29. Hammerer PG, Augustin H, Blonski J et al. [Influence of transrectal endosonography on the clinical staging of impalpable prostate cancer. A controversy over the TNM system]. Urologe A 2004; 43: 307-312
30. Schostak M, Christoph F, Panick M et al. Transrektaler Ultraschall: mehr als nur eine Punktionshilfe? Aktuelle Urologie 2002; 33: 364-367
31. Yamamoto T, Ito K, Ohi M et al. Diagnostic significance of digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasonography in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4 NG/ML or less. Urology 2001; 58: 994-998
32. Ciatto S, Bonardi R, Lombardi C et al. Predicting prostate biopsy outcome by findings at digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, PSA, PSA density and free-to- total PSA ratio in a population-based screening setting. Int J Biol Markers 2001; 16: 179-182
33. Babaian RJ, Dinney CP, Ramirez EI et al. Diagnostic testing for prostate cancer detection: less is best. Urology 1993; 41: 421-425
34. Simak R, Eisenmenger M, Hainz A et al. Is transrectal ultrasonography needed to rule out prostatic cancer with normal findings at digital rectal examination and normal serum prostate-specific antigen? Eur Urol 1993; 24: 474-478
35. Merkle W. [Colour Doppler Transrectal 3D-Sonography of the Prostate - First Experiences]. Aktuelle Urologie 2002; 33: 53-57