Laboratory hybridization between the introduced and the indigenous green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla) in Japan

Environmental Entomology

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 727-731

  Naka, Hideshi ^a   Mitsunaga, Takayuki ^b   Mochizuki, Atsushi ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR AGRO ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biological control agent; Chrysoperla; Ecological risk; Interspecific hybridization; Nontarget effect

Indexed keywords

BIOCONTROL AGENT; HYBRIDIZATION; INTRODUCED SPECIES; NATIVE SPECIES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ASIA; EASTERN HEMISPHERE; EURASIA; FAR EAST; JAPAN; WORLD;

CHRYSOPERLA; CHRYSOPERLA CARNEA; CHRYSOPERLA NIPPONENSIS; CHRYSOPIDAE; NEUROPTERA;

EID: 20344403325     PISSN: 0046225X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-34.3.727     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Albuquerque, G. S., C. A. Tauber, and M. J. Tauber. 1996. Postmating reproductive isolation between Chrysopa quadripunctata and Chrysopa slossonae: mechanisms and geographic variation. Evolution, 50: 1598-1606.
2. Brooks, S. J. 1994. A taxonomic review of the common green lacewing genus Chrysoperla. (Neuroptera: Chrysapidae). Bull Br. Nat. Hist. Entomol. 63: 137-210.
3. dos Santos, P., K. Uramoto, and S. R. Matioli. 2001. Experimental hybridization among Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae): production and morphological characterization of F1 hybrids. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94: 717-725.
4. Follett, P. A., and J. J. Duan (eds.). 2000. Nontarget effects of biological control. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA.
5. Henry, C. S. 1979. Acoustical communication during courtship and mating in the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 72: 68-79.
6. Henry, C. S. 1993. Chrysoperla johnsoni Henry (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): acoustic evidence for full species status. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 14-25.
7. Henry, C. S., and M.L.M. Wells. 2004. Adaptation or random change? The evolutionary response of songs to substrate properties in lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla). Anim. Behav. 68: 879-895.
8. Henry, C. S., M. M. Wells, and R J. Pupedis. 1993. Hidden taxonomic diversity within Chrysoperla plorabunda (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae): two new species based on courtship songs. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 86: 1-13.
9. Henry, C. S., S. J. Brooks, D. Thierry, P. Duelli and J. B. Johnson. 2001. The common green lacewing (Chrysoperla carnea s. lat.) and the sibling species problem, pp. 29-42. In P. McEween and T. R. New (eds.), Lacewings in the crop environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
10. Henry, C. S., S. J. Brooks, P. Duelli, and J. B. Johnson. 2002. Discovering the true Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Insecta: Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) using song analysis, morphology, and ecology. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 95: 172-191.
11. Howard, D. J. 1986. A zone of overlap and hybridization between two ground cricket species. Evolution. 40: 34-43.
12. Jansson, A. 1979. Postglacial distributional history of the water boatman Arctocorisa carinata Heteroptera Corixidae. Entomol. Gen. 6: 235-245.
13. Louda, S. M., R. W. Pemberton, M. T. Johnson, and P. A. Follett. 2003. Nontarget effects - the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48: 365-396.
14. Mochizuki, A., and T. Mitsunaga. 2004. Non-target impact assessment of the introduced green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) on the indigenous sibling species, C nipponensis (Okamoto) through interspecific predation. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39: 217-220.
15. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. W. H. Freeman and Company. New York.
16. Taki, H., S. Kuroki, and M. Nomura. 2005. Taxonomic diversity within the Japanese green lacewing, Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), identified by courtship song analyses and crossing tests. J. Ethol. 23: 57-61.
17. Tauber, C. A., and M. J. Tauber. 1977. A genetic model for sympatric speciation through habitat diversification and seasonal isolation. Nature (Lond.). 268: 702-705.
18. Tjeder, B. 1960. Neuroptera from Newfoundland, Miqulon, and Labrador. Opuscula Entomol. 25: 146-149.
19. Tsukaguchi, S. 1985. A check list of published species of Japanese Chrysopidae (Neuroptera). Kontyû. 53: 503-506.
20. Wajnberg, E., J. K. Scott, and P. C. Quimby (eds.). 2001. Evaluating indirect ecological effects of biological control. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
21. Walker, T. J. 1964. Cryptic species among sound-producing Ensiferan Orthoptera (Gryllidae and Tettigoniidae). Q. Rev. Biol. 39: 345-355.
22. Wells, M. M. 1993. Laboratory hybridization in green lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae: Chrysoperla): evidence for genetic incompatibility. Can. J. Zool. 71: 233-237.
23. Wells, M. M., and C. S. Henry. 1992. The role of courtship songs in reproductive isolation among populations of green lacewings of the genus Chrysoperla (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Evolution. 46: 31-42.
24. Wells, M. M., and C. S. Henry. 1994. Behavioral responses of hybrid lacewings (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) to courtship songs. J. Insect Behav. 7: 649-662.